CMCO vs SPXC vs GNRC vs ITT vs AME

For growth investors, SPX Technologies, Inc.

(SPXC) is the stronger pick with 14. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). ITT Inc. (ITT) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (27. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the cheapest at 34. 0x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, Columbus McKinnon Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ITT Inc. wins at 0. 55x versus AMETEK, Inc. 's 2. 56x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, SPX Technologies, Inc.

(SPXC) delivered a total return of +222. 6%, compared to -67. 2% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPXC returned +1183% versus CMCO's +23. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMETEK, Inc.

(AME) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Columbus McKinnon Corporation's 2. 32β — meaning CMCO is approximately 147% more volatile than AME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMETEK, Inc. (AME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 61% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SPX Technologies, Inc.

(SPXC) is pulling ahead at 14. 2% versus -5. 0% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SPX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 9% year-over-year, compared to -111. 2% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPXC leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AMETEK, Inc.

(AME) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 0% net margin versus -0. 5% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AME leads at 26. 2% versus 5. 7% for CMCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ITT Inc. (ITT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus AMETEK, Inc. 's 2. 56x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 23. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMCO: 26. 6% to $20. 00.

In this comparison, CMCO (1.

8% yield), ITT (0. 7% yield), AME (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SPXC, GNRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMETEK, Inc.

(AME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 0. 5% yield, +418. 8% 10Y return). Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AME: +418. 8%, CMCO: +23. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

CMCO, ITT, AME pay a dividend while SPXC, GNRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.