Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CMCSA vs VZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
CMCSA vs VZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $96.42B | $199.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $125.28B | $138.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18.60B | $17.17B |
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $110.44B | $200.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.48B | $19.05B |
CMCSA vs VZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.5 | -17.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMCSA vs VZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -0.0%, EPS growth 30.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 9.6x)
VZ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 5.7%
- 42.8% 10Y total return vs CMCSA's 16.8%
- Beta -0.11, yield 5.7%, current ratio 0.91x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 9.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs VZ's 12.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (113.4% vs 189.7%) | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs VZ's 5.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs CMCSA's -19.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs VZ's 4.4%, ROIC 8.2% vs 8.0% |
CMCSA vs VZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMCSA vs VZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ and CMCSA operate at a comparable scale, with $138.2B and $125.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.8% (CMCSA) to 12.4% (VZ). On growth, CMCSA holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $125.3B | $138.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35.4B | $47.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18.6B | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18.1B | $19.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.7% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.3% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.6% | -53.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 58% valuation discount to VZ's 11.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMCSA's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VZ's 8.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $96.4B | $199.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $197.4B | $381.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.91x | 11.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.50x | 9.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.35x | 8.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.40x | 9.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $16 for VZ. CMCSA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VZ's 1.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMCSA scores 7/9 vs VZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.5% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.13x | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $101.0B | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.5B | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $110.4B | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.84x | 4.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VZ five years ago would be worth $10,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,686 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, VZ leads with a +15.1% total return vs CMCSA's -19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VZ at 13.6% vs CMCSA's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.2% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.4% | +15.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.6% | +46.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | +3.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | +42.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.4% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMCSA's 0.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VZ currently trades 91.6% from its 52-week high vs CMCSA's 72.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.66 | $51.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.75 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.2% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28.4M | 24.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMCSA and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CMCSA as "Buy" and VZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for CMCSA (target: $32) vs 8.9% for VZ (target: $52). For income investors, VZ offers the higher dividend yield at 5.73% vs CMCSA's 5.09%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.87 | $51.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 60 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 18 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.35 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.4% | 0.0% |
CMCSA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VZ leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CMCSA vs VZ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCSA or VZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMCSA or VZ?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Verizon Communications Inc. at 11. 7x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMCSA or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) delivered a total return of +3. 2%, compared to -43. 1% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VZ returned +42. 8% versus CMCSA's +16. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMCSA or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus Comcast Corporation's 0. 21β — meaning CMCSA is approximately -297% more volatile than VZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 113% versus 190% for Verizon Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMCSA or VZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Comcast Corporation grew EPS 30. 2% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Verizon Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMCSA leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMCSA or VZ?
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
0% net margin versus 12. 4% for Verizon Communications Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VZ leads at 21. 2% versus 16. 7% for CMCSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMCSA or VZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7.
5x forward P/E versus 9. 6x for Verizon Communications Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMCSA: 20. 4% to $31. 87.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMCSA or VZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 5. 1% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA).
09Is CMCSA or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZ: +42. 8%, CMCSA: +16. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMCSA and VZ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.