REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CMCT vs GOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
CMCT vs GOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $3M | $622M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114M | $166M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-68M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | -22.4% | -11.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 71.3x |
| Total Debt | $510M | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $11M |
CMCT vs GOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Media & Co… (CMCT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 71.7 | -28.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMCT vs GOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMCT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth -6.3%, EPS growth 98.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.6%
- 100.0% yield, vs GOOD's 11.2%
GOOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 51.7% 10Y total return vs CMCT's -59.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.51, yield 11.2%, current ratio 1.63x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CMCT's -6.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs CMCT's -59.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs CMCT's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs GOOD's 11.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.9% vs CMCT's -99.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs CMCT's -7.9%, ROIC 4.4% vs 0.8% |
CMCT vs GOOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CMCT vs GOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD and CMCT operate at a comparable scale, with $166M and $114M in trailing revenue. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMCT's -59.4%. On growth, GOOD holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114M | $166M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $23M | $106M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$68M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | $90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -22.4% | -11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -59.4% | +12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -35.0% | +54.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.9% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GOOD's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMCT's 14.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $622M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $497M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.09x | 31.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 71.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.07x | 12.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 3.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-24 for CMCT. CMCT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOD scores 4/9 vs CMCT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.4% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.9% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.91x | 2.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $494M | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $510M | $856M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.03x | 1.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOD five years ago would be worth $9,130 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $410 for CMCT. Over the past 12 months, GOOD leads with a +1.9% total return vs CMCT's -99.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 13.1% vs CMCT's -65.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.3% | +22.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.1% | +1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | +44.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | -8.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.4% | +51.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -65.5% | +13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
GOOD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMCT's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOD currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs CMCT's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1441.00 | $15.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.60 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.4% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 23.8 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 390K |
Analyst Outlook
CMCT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CMCT offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs GOOD's 11.24%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +11.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $23.89 | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +0.7% |
GOOD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
CMCT vs GOOD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCT or GOOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger pick with 8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 3% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the better valuation at 31. 3x trailing P/E (71. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CMCT or GOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) delivered a total return of -8.
7%, compared to -95. 9% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOD returned +51. 7% versus CMCT's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CMCT or GOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation's 0. 89β — meaning CMCT is approximately 73% more volatile than GOOD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 191% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CMCT or GOOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is pulling ahead at 8.
0% versus -6. 3% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to 57. 7% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMCT leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CMCT or GOOD?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -33. 4% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOD leads at 37. 2% versus 7. 1% for CMCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOD leads at 5. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CMCT or GOOD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 11. 2% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD).
07Is CMCT or GOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 11. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOD: +51. 7%, CMCT: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CMCT and GOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.