REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CMCT vs CLPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
CMCT vs CLPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $5M | $50M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117M | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $-20M |
| Gross Margin | -10.3% | 80.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 2.7% |
| Total Debt | $510M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $31M |
CMCT vs CLPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Media & Co… (CMCT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 42.1 | -57.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMCT vs CLPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMCT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.20, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, vs CLPR's 14.0%
CLPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth -88.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
- -51.0% 10Y total return vs CMCT's -59.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CMCT's -6.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.0% margin vs CMCT's -33.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs CMCT's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs CLPR's 14.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -13.0% vs CMCT's -99.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.6% ROA vs CMCT's -4.5%, ROIC 0.6% vs 0.8% |
CMCT vs CLPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMCT vs CLPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CMCT and CLPR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPR and CMCT operate at a comparable scale, with $153M and $117M in trailing revenue. CLPR is the more profitable business, keeping -13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMCT's -33.4%. On growth, CMCT holds the edge at +3.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $117M | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | -$20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +80.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.4% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.5% | -5.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLPR's 0.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMCT's 14.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $50M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $500M | $19M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | -6.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.13x | 0.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLPR scores 4/9 vs CMCT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.5% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.91x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $494M | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $510M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.03x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLPR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLPR five years ago would be worth $5,832 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $409 for CMCT. Over the past 12 months, CLPR leads with a -13.0% total return vs CMCT's -99.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPR at -8.4% vs CMCT's -65.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.4% | -10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.1% | -13.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | -23.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | -41.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.4% | -51.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -65.5% | -8.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CLPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPR is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMCT's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPR currently trades 67.5% from its 52-week high vs CMCT's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1441.00 | $4.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.60 | $2.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.4% | +67.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 20.2 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 70K |
Analyst Outlook
CMCT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CMCT offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs CLPR's 13.97%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +14.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $23.89 | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | 0.0% |
CLPR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CMCT vs CLPR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCT or CLPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 3% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CMCT or CLPR?
Over the past 5 years, Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) delivered a total return of -41. 7%, compared to -95. 9% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLPR returned -51. 0% versus CMCT's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CMCT or CLPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation's 1. 20β — meaning CMCT is approximately 27% more volatile than CLPR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CMCT or CLPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus -6. 3% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to -88. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPR leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CMCT or CLPR?
Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is the more profitable company, earning -13. 0% net margin versus -33. 4% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps -13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMCT leads at 7. 1% versus 2. 7% for CLPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPR leads at 80. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CMCT or CLPR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 14. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR).
07Is CMCT or CLPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 14. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPR: -51. 0%, CMCT: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CMCT and CLPR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.