Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $456M | $3.09B | $1.10B | $730M | $2.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.20B | $1.04B | $114.70B | $275M | $1.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-98M | $84M | $9.32B | $46M | $262M |
| Gross Margin | 11.5% | 33.0% | 62.9% | 36.9% | 56.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2.8% | 13.6% | 0.0% | 26.0% | 28.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.0x | 14.9x | 12.6x | 4.8x |
| Total Debt | $714M | $1.07B | $200M | $537M | $1.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $500M | $56M | $84M | $270M |
CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Costamare Bulkers H… (CMDB) | 100 | 200.5 | +100.5% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 162.4 | +62.4% |
| Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK) | 100 | 190.4 | +90.4% |
| Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) | 100 | 182.5 | +82.5% |
| Navios Maritime Par… (NMM) | 100 | 182.7 | +82.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMDB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 80.3% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs SB's 7.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Among these 5 stocks, GNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
- Beta 0.98, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.91x
- 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (4.8x vs 12.6x)
- 19.9% margin vs CMDB's -8.2%
- Beta 0.72 vs CMDB's 1.04, lower leverage
- 4.4% ROA vs CMDB's -8.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs -2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 80.3% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs CMDB's -8.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs CMDB's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.5% vs CMDB's +60.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs CMDB's -8.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs -2.3% |
CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NMM leads in 3 of 6 categories
GNK leads 1 • SB leads 1 • CMDB leads 0 • SBLK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 417.6x SB's $275M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMDB's -8.2%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1.0B | $114.7B | $275M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $311M | $112M | $131M | $693M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $84M | $9.3B | $46M | $262M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $209M | $15.2B | $55M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +33.0% | +62.9% | +36.9% | +56.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +13.6% | +0.0% | +26.0% | +28.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +8.1% | +8.1% | +16.8% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | +20.0% | +13.3% | +19.9% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.7% | +1604.6% | -3.7% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +58.3% | +175.0% | -31.8% | -40.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 84% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMDB's 299.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $456M | $3.1B | $1.1B | $730M | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $3.7B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.63x | 36.73x | -252.10x | 8.36x | 5.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.00x | 14.93x | 12.61x | 4.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.75x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 299.81x | 11.87x | 14.38x | 6.96x | 4.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.38x | 2.97x | 3.21x | 2.37x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.26x | 1.22x | 0.90x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.73x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NMM delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-22 for CMDB. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMDB's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.9% | +3.4% | +4.2% | +5.6% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.1% | +2.2% | +3.0% | +3.4% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | +3.2% | +0.7% | +6.6% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.0% | +4.0% | +0.9% | +8.6% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 0.44x | 0.22x | 0.65x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $664M | $572M | $145M | $453M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $500M | $56M | $84M | $270M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $714M | $1.1B | $200M | $537M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.23x | 2.08x | 0.00x | 2.34x | 2.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $22,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,904 for CMDB. Over the past 12 months, SB leads with a +110.5% total return vs CMDB's +60.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMM at 46.9% vs CMDB's 11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.6% | +40.3% | +39.4% | +44.6% | +39.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.2% | +83.1% | +94.4% | +110.5% | +99.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +60.6% | +103.0% | +105.9% | +216.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +79.1% | +95.4% | +94.6% | +120.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +977.3% | +401.1% | +765.0% | +267.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.6% | +17.1% | +26.6% | +27.2% | +46.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SBLK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMDB's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs NMM's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.73x | 1.00x | 0.98x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.93 | $27.20 | $26.09 | $7.20 | $77.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.46 | $14.79 | $12.66 | $3.33 | $35.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +98.6% | +96.6% | +96.3% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.6 | 72.8 | 63.0 | 61.0 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 46K | 1.4M | 415K | 576K | 166K |
Analyst Outlook
SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SBLK as "Buy", GNK as "Buy", SB as "Buy", NMM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for NMM (target: $85) vs -39.4% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, SB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs NMM's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 | $20.50 | $4.20 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 22 | 22 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | +3.0% | +4.0% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.30 | $0.76 | $0.27 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +1.2% |
NMM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GNK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd (CMDB) is the stronger pick with 80.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?
On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?
Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to +39. 0% for Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd (CMDB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus CMDB's +39. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd's 1. 04β — meaning CMDB is approximately 44% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 169% for Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd (CMDB) is pulling ahead at 80.
3% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus -8. 2% for Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus -2. 8% for CMDB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 18. 8% to $85. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?
In this comparison, SB (4.
0% yield), GNK (3. 0% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield), NMM (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CMDB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, CMDB: +39. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMDB and SBLK and GNK and SB and NMM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMDB is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock. SBLK, GNK, SB pay a dividend while CMDB, NMM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.