Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMDB
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$456M
5Y Perf.+100.5%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+62.4%
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+90.4%
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+82.5%
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$2.07B
5Y Perf.+82.7%

CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMDB logoCMDB
SBLK logoSBLK
GNK logoGNK
SB logoSB
NMM logoNMM
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$456M$3.09B$1.10B$730M$2.07B
Revenue (TTM)$1.20B$1.04B$114.70B$275M$1.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-98M$84M$9.32B$46M$262M
Gross Margin11.5%33.0%62.9%36.9%56.7%
Operating Margin-2.8%13.6%0.0%26.0%28.2%
Forward P/E8.0x14.9x12.6x4.8x
Total Debt$714M$1.07B$200M$537M$1.42B
Cash & Equiv.$50M$500M$56M$84M$270M

CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMDB
SBLK
GNK
SB
NMM
StockMay 25May 26Return
Costamare Bulkers H… (CMDB)100200.5+100.5%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100162.4+62.4%
Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK)100190.4+90.4%
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB)100182.5+82.5%
Navios Maritime Par… (NMM)100182.7+82.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NMM leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Safe Bulkers, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. CMDB also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CMDB
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd
The Growth Leader

CMDB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 80.3% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
Best for: growth
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs SB's 7.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
The Income Pick

SB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.0%
  • Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
  • Beta 0.98, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.91x
  • 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
The Value Play

NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (4.8x vs 12.6x)
  • 19.9% margin vs CMDB's -8.2%
  • Beta 0.72 vs CMDB's 1.04, lower leverage
  • 4.4% ROA vs CMDB's -8.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs -2.3%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCMDB logoCMDB80.3% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
ValueNMM logoNMMLower P/E (4.8x vs 12.6x)
Quality / MarginsNMM logoNMM19.9% margin vs CMDB's -8.2%
Stability / SafetyNMM logoNMMBeta 0.72 vs CMDB's 1.04, lower leverage
DividendsSB logoSB4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SB logoSB+110.5% vs CMDB's +60.2%
Efficiency (ROA)NMM logoNMM4.4% ROA vs CMDB's -8.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs -2.3%

CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMDBCostamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited
FY 2025
Cargo and Freight
100.0%$342M
SBSafe Bulkers, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P.

Segment breakdown not available.

CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNMMLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 417.6x SB's $275M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMDB's -8.2%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMDB logoCMDBCostamare Bulkers…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.2B$1.0B$114.7B$275M$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$311M$112M$131M$693M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$84M$9.3B$46M$262M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$209M$15.2B$55M$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.5%+33.0%+62.9%+36.9%+56.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.8%+13.6%+0.0%+26.0%+28.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.2%+8.1%+8.1%+16.8%+19.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-19.1%+20.0%+13.3%+19.9%+2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.7%+1604.6%-3.7%+1.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.3%+175.0%-31.8%-40.6%
GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 6.0x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 84% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMDB's 299.8x.

MetricCMDB logoCMDBCostamare Bulkers…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Market CapShares × price$456M$3.1B$1.1B$730M$2.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$3.7B$1.2B$1.2B$3.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.63x36.73x-252.10x8.36x5.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.00x14.93x12.61x4.81x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple299.81x11.87x14.38x6.96x4.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.38x2.97x3.21x2.37x1.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.08x1.26x1.22x0.90x0.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.73x
NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NMM delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-22 for CMDB. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMDB's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCMDB logoCMDBCostamare Bulkers…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-21.9%+3.4%+4.2%+5.6%+8.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-8.1%+2.2%+3.0%+3.4%+4.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.3%+3.2%+0.7%+6.6%+8.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.0%+4.0%+0.9%+8.6%+9.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955377
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.69x0.44x0.22x0.65x0.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$664M$572M$145M$453M$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$50M$500M$56M$84M$270M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$714M$1.1B$200M$537M$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.23x2.08x0.00x2.34x2.78x
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $22,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,904 for CMDB. Over the past 12 months, SB leads with a +110.5% total return vs CMDB's +60.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMM at 46.9% vs CMDB's 11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMDB logoCMDBCostamare Bulkers…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.6%+40.3%+39.4%+44.6%+39.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+60.2%+83.1%+94.4%+110.5%+99.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.0%+60.6%+103.0%+105.9%+216.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.0%+79.1%+95.4%+94.6%+120.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.0%+977.3%+401.1%+765.0%+267.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+11.6%+17.1%+26.6%+27.2%+46.9%
NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SBLK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMDB's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs NMM's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCMDB logoCMDBCostamare Bulkers…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.04x0.73x1.00x0.98x0.72x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.93$27.20$26.09$7.20$77.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.46$14.79$12.66$3.33$35.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.2%+98.6%+96.6%+96.3%+91.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.672.863.061.057.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded46K1.4M415K576K166K
Evenly matched — SBLK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SBLK as "Buy", GNK as "Buy", SB as "Buy", NMM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for NMM (target: $85) vs -39.4% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, SB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs NMM's 0.29%.

MetricCMDB logoCMDBCostamare Bulkers…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$20.50$4.20$85.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts24222214
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+3.0%+4.0%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0033
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.30$0.76$0.27$0.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.2%0.0%+4.0%+1.2%
SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NMM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GNK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallNavios Maritime Partners L.… (NMM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMDB vs SBLK vs GNK vs SB vs NMM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd (CMDB) is the stronger pick with 80.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?

On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?

Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to +39. 0% for Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd (CMDB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus CMDB's +39. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd's 1. 04β — meaning CMDB is approximately 44% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 169% for Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd (CMDB) is pulling ahead at 80.

3% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?

Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus -8. 2% for Costamare Bulkers Holdings Ltd — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus -2. 8% for CMDB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 18. 8% to $85. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM?

In this comparison, SB (4.

0% yield), GNK (3. 0% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield), NMM (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CMDB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CMDB or SBLK or GNK or SB or NMM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, CMDB: +39. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMDB and SBLK and GNK and SB and NMM?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CMDB is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock. SBLK, GNK, SB pay a dividend while CMDB, NMM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CMDB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 80229%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NMM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CMDB and SBLK and GNK and SB and NMM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CMDB: 80.3% · SBLK: -2.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.