Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMLS vs IHRT vs SBGI vs GTN vs NXST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMLS
Cumulus Media Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$87K
5Y Perf.-99.9%
IHRT
iHeartMedia, Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$880M
5Y Perf.-62.4%
SBGI
Sinclair, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$991M
5Y Perf.-12.6%
GTN
Gray Media, Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$412M
5Y Perf.-62.8%
NXST
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.89B
5Y Perf.+201.3%

CMLS vs IHRT vs SBGI vs GTN vs NXST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMLS logoCMLS
IHRT logoIHRT
SBGI logoSBGI
GTN logoGTN
NXST logoNXST
IndustryBroadcastingBroadcastingEntertainmentBroadcastingEntertainment
Market Cap$87K$880M$991M$412M$5.89B
Revenue (TTM)$772M$3.86B$3.17B$3.08B$5.11B
Net Income (TTM)$-297M$-473M$-112M$-76M$165M
Gross Margin62.7%78.5%44.8%115.0%32.3%
Operating Margin-31.3%-0.5%5.5%12.4%17.8%
Forward P/E12.3x1.8x7.9x
Total Debt$795M$5.79B$4.52B$5.81B$6.86B
Cash & Equiv.$64M$271K$866M$368M$280M

CMLS vs IHRT vs SBGI vs GTN vs NXSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMLS
IHRT
SBGI
GTN
NXST
StockMay 20Mar 26Return
Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS)1000.1-99.9%
iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT)10037.6-62.4%
Sinclair, Inc. (SBGI)10087.4-12.6%
Gray Media, Inc. (GTN)10037.2-62.8%
Nexstar Media Group… (NXST)100301.3+201.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMLS vs IHRT vs SBGI vs GTN vs NXST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NXST leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. iHeartMedia, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. GTN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CMLS
Cumulus Media Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

CMLS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
IHRT
iHeartMedia, Inc.
The Growth Play

IHRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 0.3%, EPS growth 54.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
  • 0.3% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1%
  • +415.5% vs CMLS's -96.2%
Best for: growth exposure
SBGI
Sinclair, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

SBGI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.75, yield 7.0%, current ratio 2.42x
Best for: defensive
GTN
Gray Media, Inc.
The Income Pick

GTN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.54, yield 7.7%
  • Lower P/E (1.8x vs 7.9x)
  • 7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NXST's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
NXST
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NXST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 331.4% 10Y total return vs SBGI's -28.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 2.07x
  • 3.2% margin vs CMLS's -38.4%
  • Beta 0.73 vs CMLS's 1.87, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIHRT logoIHRT0.3% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1%
ValueGTN logoGTNLower P/E (1.8x vs 7.9x)
Quality / MarginsNXST logoNXST3.2% margin vs CMLS's -38.4%
Stability / SafetyNXST logoNXSTBeta 0.73 vs CMLS's 1.87, lower leverage
DividendsGTN logoGTN7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NXST's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)IHRT logoIHRT+415.5% vs CMLS's -96.2%
Efficiency (ROA)NXST logoNXST1.9% ROA vs CMLS's -27.1%, ROIC 7.4% vs -20.5%

CMLS vs IHRT vs SBGI vs GTN vs NXST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMLSCumulus Media Inc.
FY 2024
Broadcast Radio Revenue
40.5%$564M
Spot Revenue
27.9%$389M
Network Revenue
12.6%$175M
Digital Revenue
11.1%$154M
Other Revenue
7.8%$109M
IHRTiHeartMedia, Inc.
FY 2024
Broadcast Radio
44.8%$1.7B
Digital Non-podcast
18.5%$711M
Digital Podcast
11.6%$449M
Networks
11.3%$437M
Audio And Media Services
8.3%$322M
Sponsorship And Events
4.9%$187M
Other
0.5%$21M
SBGISinclair, Inc.
FY 2025
Local Media Segment
94.4%$2.8B
Other Operating Segment
5.6%$166M
GTNGray Media, Inc.
FY 2025
Advertising
32.6%$1.5B
Core Advertising
31.6%$1.5B
Retransmission Consent
31.1%$1.4B
Production Companies
2.3%$107M
Service, Other
1.4%$65M
Political Advertising
0.9%$42M
NXSTNexstar Media Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Distribution Service
59.1%$2.9B
Advertising
39.6%$2.0B
Other
1.3%$66M

CMLS vs IHRT vs SBGI vs GTN vs NXST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNXSTLAGGINGSBGI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NXST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NXST is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 6.6x CMLS's $772M. NXST is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMLS's -38.4%. On growth, NXST holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMLS logoCMLSCumulus Media Inc.IHRT logoIHRTiHeartMedia, Inc.SBGI logoSBGISinclair, Inc.GTN logoGTNGray Media, Inc.NXST logoNXSTNexstar Media Gro…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$772M$3.9B$3.2B$3.1B$5.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$185M$339M$475M$932M$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$297M-$473M-$112M-$76M$165M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M$11M$115M-$74M$708M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.7%+78.5%+44.8%+115.0%+32.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-31.3%-0.5%+5.5%+12.4%+17.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-38.4%-12.2%-3.5%-2.5%+3.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.3%+0.3%+3.6%-2.4%+13.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.5%+0.8%-16.7%-1.8%+13.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-91.8%-20.8%-40.8%+98.5%+51.0%
NXST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CMLS and GTN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, NXST's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IHRT's 19.6x.

MetricCMLS logoCMLSCumulus Media Inc.IHRT logoIHRTiHeartMedia, Inc.SBGI logoSBGISinclair, Inc.GTN logoGTNGray Media, Inc.NXST logoNXSTNexstar Media Gro…
Market CapShares × price$87,200$880M$991M$412M$5.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$731M$6.7B$4.6B$5.9B$12.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x-1.86x-8.81x-5.03x64.75x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.28x1.81x7.88x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.65x9.74x9.31x7.57x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.00x0.23x0.31x0.13x1.19x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.01x2.65x0.15x2.89x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF80.64x8.62x2.27x7.93x
Evenly matched — CMLS and GTN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NXST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NXST delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-193 for CMLS. GTN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMLS's 114.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NXST scores 5/9 vs SBGI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCMLS logoCMLSCumulus Media Inc.IHRT logoIHRTiHeartMedia, Inc.SBGI logoSBGISinclair, Inc.GTN logoGTNGray Media, Inc.NXST logoNXSTNexstar Media Gro…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-193.0%-34.3%-2.9%+10.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-27.1%-12.0%-2.0%-0.7%+1.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-20.5%-0.4%+2.8%+3.5%+7.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-21.0%-0.5%+2.9%+3.9%+8.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944245
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage114.33x12.21x2.07x3.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$731M$5.8B$3.7B$5.4B$6.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$64M$270,900$866M$368M$280M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$795M$5.8B$4.5B$5.8B$6.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.03x-0.17x0.76x1.12x1.81x
NXST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IHRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NXST five years ago would be worth $15,010 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for CMLS. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs CMLS's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IHRT at 23.0% vs CMLS's -87.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMLS logoCMLSCumulus Media Inc.IHRT logoIHRTiHeartMedia, Inc.SBGI logoSBGISinclair, Inc.GTN logoGTNGray Media, Inc.NXST logoNXSTNexstar Media Gro…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-93.2%+36.6%-5.2%-6.0%-6.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-96.2%+415.5%-3.3%+27.7%+29.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+85.9%+5.3%-26.1%+29.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-75.0%-43.1%-72.7%+50.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-68.5%-28.9%-50.5%+331.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-87.6%+23.0%+1.7%-9.6%+8.9%
IHRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IHRT and NXST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NXST is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMLS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IHRT currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs CMLS's 2.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCMLS logoCMLSCumulus Media Inc.IHRT logoIHRTiHeartMedia, Inc.SBGI logoSBGISinclair, Inc.GTN logoGTNGray Media, Inc.NXST logoNXSTNexstar Media Gro…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.87x1.82x0.75x1.54x0.73x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.20$6.56$17.88$6.43$254.30
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$1.08$11.89$3.50$154.64
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.5%+86.4%+79.3%+68.9%+76.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10025.568.646.352.843.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M986K491K1.3M402K
Evenly matched — IHRT and NXST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: IHRT as "Buy", SBGI as "Buy", GTN as "Buy", NXST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.6% upside for GTN (target: $8) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, GTN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.68% vs IHRT's 0.19%.

MetricCMLS logoCMLSCumulus Media Inc.IHRT logoIHRTiHeartMedia, Inc.SBGI logoSBGISinclair, Inc.GTN logoGTNGray Media, Inc.NXST logoNXSTNexstar Media Gro…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50$17.00$8.00$250.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1020924
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+7.0%+7.7%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00030
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$1.00$0.34$5.50
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.0%
GTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NXST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IHRT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallNexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMLS vs IHRT vs SBGI vs GTN vs NXST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMLS or IHRT or SBGI or GTN or NXST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, iHeartMedia, Inc.

(IHRT) is the stronger pick with 0. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) offers the better valuation at 64. 8x trailing P/E (7. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMLS or IHRT or SBGI or GTN or NXST?

On forward P/E, Gray Media, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMLS or IHRT or SBGI or GTN or NXST?

Over the past 5 years, Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

(NXST) delivered a total return of +50. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXST returned +331. 4% versus CMLS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMLS or IHRT or SBGI or GTN or NXST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

(NXST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Cumulus Media Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning CMLS is approximately 157% more volatile than NXST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 114% for Cumulus Media Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMLS or IHRT or SBGI or GTN or NXST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), iHeartMedia, Inc.

(IHRT) is pulling ahead at 0. 3% versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: iHeartMedia, Inc. grew EPS 54. 3% year-over-year, compared to -145. 8% for Cumulus Media Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IHRT leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMLS or IHRT or SBGI or GTN or NXST?

Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

(NXST) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 2% net margin versus -34. 2% for Cumulus Media Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXST leads at 17. 4% versus -29. 0% for CMLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTN leads at 96. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMLS or IHRT or SBGI or GTN or NXST more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Gray Media, Inc.

(GTN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Sinclair, Inc. — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTN: 80. 6% to $8. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMLS or IHRT or SBGI or GTN or NXST?

In this comparison, GTN (7.

7% yield), SBGI (7. 0% yield), NXST (2. 8% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CMLS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CMLS or IHRT or SBGI or GTN or NXST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

(NXST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 2. 8% yield, +331. 4% 10Y return). Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXST: +331. 4%, CMLS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMLS and IHRT and SBGI and GTN and NXST?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CMLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SBGI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXST is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SBGI, GTN, NXST pay a dividend while CMLS, IHRT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CMLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $2B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IHRT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBGI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GTN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 68%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NXST

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CMLS and IHRT and SBGI and GTN and NXST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CMLS: -11.5% · IHRT: 0.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.