CMPO vs ENTG

For growth investors, CompoSecure, Inc.

(CMPO) is the stronger pick with 7. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) offers the better valuation at 95. 3x trailing P/E (41. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, CompoSecure, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, CompoSecure, Inc.

(CMPO) delivered a total return of +100. 3%, compared to +30. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENTG returned +1040% versus CMPO's +104. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CompoSecure, Inc.

(CMPO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 47β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 82% more volatile than CMPO relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CompoSecure, Inc.

(CMPO) is pulling ahead at 7. 7% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Entegris, Inc. grew EPS -19. 7% year-over-year, compared to -325. 9% for CompoSecure, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMPO leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Entegris, Inc.

(ENTG) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -12. 8% for CompoSecure, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus 25. 6% for CMPO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMPO leads at 52. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, CompoSecure, Inc.

(CMPO) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for Entegris, Inc. — 26. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMPO: 51. 4% to $25. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPO) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 3% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, CompoSecure, Inc.

(CMPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +104. 7% 10Y return). Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMPO: +104. 7%, ENTG: +1040%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CMPO (Industrials) and ENTG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

CMPO pays a dividend while ENTG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.