Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CMSC vs NI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
CMSC vs NI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $7.04B | $22.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.54B | $6.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.07B | $962M |
| Gross Margin | 26.2% | 62.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 27.8% |
| Forward P/E | 5.9x | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $18.90B | $16.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $615M | $136M |
CMSC vs NI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMS Energy Corporat… (CMSC) | 100 | 85.0 | -15.0% |
| NiSource Inc. (NI) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMSC vs NI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMSC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 9.6%
- Beta 0.69, yield 9.6%, current ratio 1.23x
- Lower P/E (5.9x vs 22.9x)
NI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.8%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 137.6% 10Y total return vs CMSC's 36.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, current ratio 0.69x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.8% revenue growth vs CMSC's 13.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 22.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.1% margin vs CMSC's 12.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs CMSC's 0.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.6% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs NI's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.0% vs CMSC's +10.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs NI's 2.7%, ROIC 4.9% vs 5.3% |
CMSC vs NI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMSC vs NI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CMSC and NI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMSC and NI operate at a comparable scale, with $8.5B and $6.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.1% (NI) to 12.5% (CMSC). On growth, CMSC holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.5B | $6.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.8B | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $962M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +62.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +27.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | -15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.3% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +6.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CMSC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, CMSC trades at a 73% valuation discount to NI's 24.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMSC's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NI's 12.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.0B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.3B | $38.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.51x | 24.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.93x | 22.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.94x | 12.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 3.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMSC delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for NI. NI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMSC's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NI scores 7/9 vs CMSC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.6% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.9% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.95x | 1.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18.3B | $16.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $615M | $136M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18.9B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.42x | 2.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NI five years ago would be worth $20,085 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,011 for CMSC. Over the past 12 months, NI leads with a +19.0% total return vs CMSC's +10.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NI at 20.9% vs CMSC's 3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.3% | +19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | +76.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.1% | +100.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.7% | +137.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.8% | +20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
NI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NI is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMSC's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.53 | $48.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.15 | $37.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.8 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
CMSC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CMSC offers the higher dividend yield at 9.59% vs NI's 2.38%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $49.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.6% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.20 | $1.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CMSC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CMSC vs NI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMSC or NI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NiSource Inc.
(NI) is the stronger pick with 21. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 6% for CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J (CMSC). CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J (CMSC) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NiSource Inc. (NI) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMSC or NI?
On trailing P/E, CMS Energy Corporation 5.
875% J (CMSC) is the cheapest at 6. 5x versus NiSource Inc. at 24. 1x. On forward P/E, CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J is actually cheaper at 5. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMSC or NI?
Over the past 5 years, NiSource Inc.
(NI) delivered a total return of +100. 8%, compared to +10. 1% for CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J (CMSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NI returned +137. 6% versus CMSC's +36. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMSC or NI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NiSource Inc.
(NI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J's 0. 69β — meaning CMSC is approximately 216% more volatile than NI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NiSource Inc. (NI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 139% versus 195% for CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMSC or NI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NiSource Inc.
(NI) is pulling ahead at 21. 8% versus 13. 6% for CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J (CMSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NiSource Inc. grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to 6. 0% for CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J. Over a 3-year CAGR, NI leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMSC or NI?
NiSource Inc.
(NI) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 0% net margin versus 12. 5% for CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NI leads at 27. 6% versus 20. 2% for CMSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NI leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMSC or NI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CMS Energy Corporation 5.
875% J (CMSC) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for NiSource Inc. — 16. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMSC or NI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CMS Energy Corporation 5. 875% J (CMSC) offers the highest yield at 9. 6%, versus 2. 4% for NiSource Inc. (NI).
09Is CMSC or NI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NiSource Inc.
(NI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 2. 4% yield, +137. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NI: +137. 6%, CMSC: +36. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMSC and NI?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.