CNDT vs ACN

For growth investors, Accenture plc (ACN) is the stronger pick with 7.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). Accenture plc (ACN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Accenture plc (ACN) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Accenture plc (ACN) delivered a total return of -29.

5%, compared to -75. 7% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACN returned +89. 9% versus CNDT's -88. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Accenture plc (ACN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

85β versus Conduent Incorporated's 1. 72β — meaning CNDT is approximately 102% more volatile than ACN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Accenture plc (ACN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 95% for Conduent Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Accenture plc (ACN) is pulling ahead at 7.

4% versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Accenture plc grew EPS 6. 2% year-over-year, compared to -151. 1% for Conduent Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACN leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Accenture plc (ACN) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

0% net margin versus -5. 6% for Conduent Incorporated — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACN leads at 14. 7% versus 4. 5% for CNDT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACN leads at 31. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 3. 2% for Accenture plc (ACN).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Accenture plc (ACN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

85), 3. 2% yield). Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACN: +89. 9%, CNDT: -88. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CNDT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ACN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.