Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNET vs MKTW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
CNET vs MKTW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2M | $41M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $326M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $64M |
| Gross Margin | 4.8% | 86.4% |
| Operating Margin | -31.7% | 19.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $122K | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $812K | $70M |
CNET vs MKTW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNET vs MKTW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, CNET is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
MKTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 11.7%
- Rev growth -20.3%, EPS growth -35.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.0%
- -88.1% 10Y total return vs CNET's -97.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -20.3% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs CNET's -33.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs CNET's 1.18 | |
| Dividends | 11.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.0% vs CNET's -53.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.4% ROA vs CNET's -21.3% |
CNET vs MKTW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNET vs MKTW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKTW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKTW is the larger business by revenue, generating $326M annually — 52.8x CNET's $6M. MKTW is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNET's -33.4%. On growth, MKTW holds the edge at -16.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $326M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $65M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +86.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.7% | +19.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.4% | +19.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.3% | +14.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.0% | -16.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.7% | +98.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNET and MKTW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $41M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | -$23M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.40x | 7.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -0.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CNET and MKTW each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNET scores 5/9 vs MKTW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.3% | +29.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -64.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -73.5% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$690,000 | -$64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $812,000 | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $122,000 | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKTW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MKTW five years ago would be worth $1,182 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $219 for CNET. Over the past 12 months, MKTW leads with a +33.0% total return vs CNET's -53.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKTW at -9.9% vs CNET's -51.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.7% | +14.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.6% | +33.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.2% | -27.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -88.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -88.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.0% | -9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MKTW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKTW is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNET's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKTW currently trades 77.1% from its 52-week high vs CNET's 26.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.78 | $21.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $13.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.9% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 26K |
Analyst Outlook
MKTW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
MKTW is the only dividend payer here at 11.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +11.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MKTW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
CNET vs MKTW: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNET or MKTW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the stronger pick with -20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CNET or MKTW?
Over the past 5 years, MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) delivered a total return of -88. 2%, compared to -97. 8% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MKTW returned -88. 1% versus CNET's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CNET or MKTW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning CNET is approximately 218% more volatile than MKTW relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CNET or MKTW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is pulling ahead at -20. 3% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MarketWise, Inc. grew EPS -35. 3% year-over-year, compared to -124. 1% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MKTW leads at -14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CNET or MKTW?
MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 7% net margin versus -24. 4% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKTW leads at 19. 2% versus -24. 3% for CNET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKTW leads at 86. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CNET or MKTW?
In this comparison, MKTW (11.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CNET does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CNET or MKTW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 37), 11. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTW: -88. 1%, CNET: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CNET and MKTW?
These companies operate in different sectors (CNET (Communication Services) and MKTW (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKTW is a small-cap deep-value stock. MKTW pays a dividend while CNET does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.