Railroads
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNI vs WAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Railroads
CNI vs WAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Railroads | Railroads |
| Market Cap | $67.77B | $45.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.29B | $11.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.71B | $1.21B |
| Gross Margin | 44.2% | 33.8% |
| Operating Margin | 37.8% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $21.82B | $5.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $363M | $789M |
CNI vs WAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian National R… (CNI) | 100 | 128.8 | +28.8% |
| Westinghouse Air Br… (WAB) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNI vs WAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.67x
WAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 247.1% 10Y total return vs CNI's 121.9%
- PEG 0.97 vs CNI's 1.60
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% revenue growth vs CNI's 1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.2% margin vs WAB's 10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs WAB's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.6% vs CNI's +13.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs WAB's 5.6%, ROIC 11.6% vs 9.6% |
CNI vs WAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CNI vs WAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNI is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.3B annually — 1.5x WAB's $11.5B. CNI is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAB's 10.5%. On growth, WAB holds the edge at +13.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.3B | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.5B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.7B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.6B | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +33.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.3% | +13.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +12.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CNI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.0x trailing earnings, CNI trades at a 49% valuation discount to WAB's 38.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WAB offers better value at 1.51x vs CNI's 2.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67.8B | $45.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83.5B | $49.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.00x | 38.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.83x | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.32x | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.37x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.35x | 4.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.38x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.29x | 30.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CNI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNI delivers a 21.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $11 for WAB. WAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNI's 1.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNI scores 8/9 vs WAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.9% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.2% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21.5B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $363M | $789M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21.8B | $5.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.85x | 7.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAB five years ago would be worth $32,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,909 for CNI. Over the past 12 months, WAB leads with a +40.6% total return vs CNI's +13.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAB at 39.3% vs CNI's -0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.2% | +23.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.7% | +40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.2% | +170.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | +229.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.9% | +247.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.7% | +39.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNI and WAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNI is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $115.80 | $275.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $90.74 | $184.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 58.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 905K |
Analyst Outlook
CNI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNI as "Hold" and WAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for WAB (target: $291) vs -9.2% for CNI (target: $101). For income investors, CNI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.34% vs WAB's 0.38%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $100.67 | $291.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.54 | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +0.5% |
CNI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WAB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CNI vs WAB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNI or WAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the stronger pick with 7.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Canadian National Railway Company (CNI). Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNI or WAB?
On trailing P/E, Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) is the cheapest at 20.
0x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation at 38. 9x. On forward P/E, Canadian National Railway Company is actually cheaper at 13. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation wins at 0. 97x versus Canadian National Railway Company's 1. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNI or WAB?
Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +229.
0%, compared to +9. 1% for Canadian National Railway Company (CNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAB returned +247. 1% versus CNI's +121. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNI or WAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning WAB is approximately 66% more volatile than CNI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 101% for Canadian National Railway Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNI or WAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is pulling ahead at 7.
5% versus 1. 4% for Canadian National Railway Company (CNI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation grew EPS 13. 1% year-over-year, compared to 7. 8% for Canadian National Railway Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAB leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNI or WAB?
Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 10. 5% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNI leads at 38. 1% versus 16. 7% for WAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNI leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNI or WAB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Canadian National Railway Company's 1. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WAB: 9. 5% to $291. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNI or WAB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 0. 4% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB).
09Is CNI or WAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 2. 3% yield, +121. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNI: +121. 9%, WAB: +247. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNI and WAB?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CNI pays a dividend while WAB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.