CNL
Collective Mining Ltd.
Gold
Market Cap$1.63B
5Y Perf.+563.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CNL vs MUX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
Other Precious Metals
Market Cap$1.39B
5Y Perf.+147.6%
CNL vs MUX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CNL | MUX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Other Precious Metals |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $1.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $162M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $74M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 22.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $156K | $926K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $51M |
CNL vs MUX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CNL
MUX
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collective Mining L… (CNL) | 100 | 663.7 | +563.7% |
| McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNL vs MUX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MUX leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Collective Mining Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CNL
Collective Mining Ltd.
The Income Pick
CNL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.07
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs MUX's -0.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 7.23x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
The Growth Play
MUX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.2%, EPS growth 168.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.4%
- 13.2% revenue growth vs CNL's -102.3%
- 45.7% margin vs CNL's 2.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MUX | 13.2% revenue growth vs CNL's -102.3% |
| Quality / Margins | MUX | 45.7% margin vs CNL's 2.0% |
| Stability / Safety | CNL | Beta 1.07 vs MUX's 1.27 |
| Dividends | MUX | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MUX | +198.5% vs CNL's +79.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MUX | 9.0% ROA vs CNL's -58.5% |
CNL vs MUX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2014
FY 2025
CNL vs MUX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCNLLAGGINGMUX
MUXMcEwen Mining Inc.
2leads
CNLCollective Mining Ltd.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MUXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MUX1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MUX7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CNL5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CNL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MUX and CNL operate at a comparable scale, with $162M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | CNLCollective Mining… | MUXMcEwen Mining Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $162M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $74M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$30M | -$24M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +32.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +45.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.8% | +4.9% |
MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNL and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CNLCollective Mining… | MUXMcEwen Mining Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -46.63x | 39.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 74.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 32.75x | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — CNL and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MUX leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MUX delivers a 13.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-75 for CNL. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNL's 0.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MUX scores 5/9 vs CNL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CNLCollective Mining… | MUXMcEwen Mining Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -75.3% | +13.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -58.5% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -91.0% | -1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155,527 | $926,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -140.67x | -1.52x |
MUX leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNL five years ago would be worth $63,971 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,977 for MUX. Over the past 12 months, MUX leads with a +198.5% total return vs CNL's +79.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNL at 85.6% vs MUX's 38.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CNLCollective Mining… | MUXMcEwen Mining Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.4% | +25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.5% | +198.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +539.7% | +163.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +539.7% | +79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +539.7% | -0.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +85.6% | +38.1% |
CNL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNL is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MUX's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | CNLCollective Mining… | MUXMcEwen Mining Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.97 | $29.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.30 | $6.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.7% | +78.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 992K |
CNL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNL as "Buy" and MUX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.1% upside for CNL (target: $25) vs 28.4% for MUX (target: $30). MUX is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CNLCollective Mining… | MUXMcEwen Mining Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
MUX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallCollective Mining Ltd. (CNL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CNL vs MUX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNL or MUX a better buy right now?
McEwen Mining Inc.
(MUX) offers the better valuation at 39. 6x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Collective Mining Ltd. (CNL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CNL or MUX?
Over the past 5 years, Collective Mining Ltd.
(CNL) delivered a total return of +539. 7%, compared to +79. 8% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNL returned +539. 7% versus MUX's -0. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CNL or MUX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Collective Mining Ltd.
(CNL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus McEwen Mining Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning MUX is approximately 19% more volatile than CNL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 0% for Collective Mining Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CNL or MUX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McEwen Mining Inc.
grew EPS 168. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 2% for Collective Mining Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CNL or MUX?
McEwen Mining Inc.
(MUX) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Collective Mining Ltd. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNL leads at 0. 0% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MUX leads at 11. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CNL or MUX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNL: 41.
1% to $25. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CNL or MUX?
In this comparison, MUX (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CNL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CNL or MUX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Collective Mining Ltd.
(CNL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), +539. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNL: +539. 7%, MUX: -0. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CNL and MUX?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.