Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MUX vs EXK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.36B
5Y Perf.+152.5%
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.74B
5Y Perf.+384.9%

MUX vs EXK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MUX logoMUX
EXK logoEXK
IndustryOther Precious MetalsOther Precious Metals
Market Cap$1.36B$2.74B
Revenue (TTM)$162M$330M
Net Income (TTM)$74M$-94M
Gross Margin32.9%9.3%
Operating Margin22.2%-1.7%
Forward P/E21.7x13.2x
Total Debt$926K$120M
Cash & Equiv.$51M$106M

MUX vs EXKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MUX
EXK
StockMay 20May 26Return
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX)100252.5+152.5%
Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK)100484.9+384.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MUX vs EXK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MUX leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Endeavour Silver Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
The Income Pick

MUX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 0.2%
  • Rev growth 13.2%, EPS growth 168.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 1.69x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 138.7% 10Y total return vs MUX's -9.0%
  • Lower P/E (13.2x vs 21.7x)
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMUX logoMUX13.2% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9%
ValueEXK logoEXKLower P/E (13.2x vs 21.7x)
Quality / MarginsMUX logoMUX45.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
Stability / SafetyMUX logoMUXBeta 1.27 vs EXK's 1.71, lower leverage
DividendsMUX logoMUX0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MUX logoMUX+181.0% vs EXK's +155.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MUX logoMUX9.0% ROA vs EXK's -9.2%, ROIC -1.9% vs 1.5%

MUX vs EXK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MUXMcEwen Mining Inc.
FY 2025
United States Reportable Segment
59.1%$117M
Canada Reportable Segment
38.5%$76M
Mexico Reportable Segment
2.4%$5M
EXKEndeavour Silver Corp.
FY 2024
Concentrate Sales
101.1%$71M
Provisional Pricing Adjustments
-1.1%$-776,000

MUX vs EXK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMUXLAGGINGEXK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MUX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

EXK is the larger business by revenue, generating $330M annually — 2.0x MUX's $162M. MUX is the more profitable business, keeping 45.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$162M$330M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$61M$49M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$74M-$94M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$24M-$129M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.9%+9.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.2%-1.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+45.7%-28.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.7%-39.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+154.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.9%-97.5%
MUX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EXK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, EXK's 69.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MUX's 72.8x.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$2.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS38.68x-71.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.68x13.15x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple72.83x69.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.87x12.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.26x4.65x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
EXK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MUX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MUX delivers a 13.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-18 for EXK. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MUX scores 5/9 vs EXK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.6%-18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.0%-9.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.9%+1.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.9%+1.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$50M$14M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$51M$106M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$926,000$120M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.52x-39.17x
MUX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MUX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MUX five years ago would be worth $18,256 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,848 for EXK. Over the past 12 months, MUX leads with a +181.0% total return vs EXK's +155.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MUX at 37.0% vs EXK's 30.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.2%+3.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+181.0%+155.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+157.3%+123.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.6%+48.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.0%+138.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+37.0%+30.8%
MUX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MUX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MUX is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUX currently trades 76.8% from its 52-week high vs EXK's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x1.71x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$29.70$15.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.88$3.14
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.8%+61.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.737.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.0M9.2M
MUX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates MUX as "Buy" and EXK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.9% upside for EXK (target: $13) vs 31.5% for MUX (target: $30). MUX is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00$12.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts714
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MUX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallMcEwen Mining Inc. (MUX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MUX vs EXK: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MUX or EXK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) is the stronger pick with 13. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MUX or EXK?

On forward P/E, Endeavour Silver Corp.

is actually cheaper at 13. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MUX or EXK?

Over the past 5 years, McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) delivered a total return of +82. 6%, compared to +48. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXK returned +138. 7% versus MUX's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MUX or EXK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 34% more volatile than MUX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MUX or EXK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) is pulling ahead at 13. 2% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McEwen Mining Inc. grew EPS 168. 6% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MUX leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MUX or EXK?

McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXK leads at 3. 8% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXK leads at 19. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MUX or EXK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Endeavour Silver Corp.

(EXK) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for McEwen Mining Inc. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXK: 36. 9% to $12. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MUX or EXK?

In this comparison, MUX (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. EXK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MUX or EXK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27)). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MUX: -9. 0%, EXK: +138. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MUX and EXK?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MUX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 77%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MUX and EXK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MUX: -100.0% · EXK: 154.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.