Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CNMD vs MMSI vs HOLX vs ATRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
CNMD vs MMSI vs HOLX vs ATRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $1.17B | $3.72B | $16.97B | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $1.54B | $4.13B | $552M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $139M | $544M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 53.6% | 48.7% | 52.8% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 12.2% | 17.5% | -0.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.7x | 15.5x | 17.2x | 370.7x |
| Total Debt | $835M | $898M | $2.63B | $88M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $449M | $1.96B | $167M |
CNMD vs MMSI vs HOLX vs ATRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONMED Corporation (CNMD) | 100 | 51.9 | -48.1% |
| Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI) | 100 | 138.5 | +38.5% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 58.1 | -41.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNMD vs MMSI vs HOLX vs ATRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 370.7x)
- 2.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
MMSI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 214.6% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 4.34x
HOLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.41
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 52.0%, current ratio 3.75x
- 13.2% margin vs ATRC's -0.8%
- Beta 0.41 vs CNMD's 1.34, lower leverage
ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 74.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 14.9% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 370.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs ATRC's -0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs CNMD's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.1% vs MMSI's -33.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs ATRC's -0.7%, ROIC 9.4% vs -0.6% |
CNMD vs MMSI vs HOLX vs ATRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNMD vs MMSI vs HOLX vs ATRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOLX leads in 4 of 6 categories
CNMD leads 1 • MMSI leads 0 • ATRC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 7.5x ATRC's $552M. HOLX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATRC's -0.8%. On growth, ATRC holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.5B | $4.1B | $552M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $219M | $290M | $974M | $13M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $139M | $544M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | $274M | $1000M | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.6% | +48.7% | +52.8% | +75.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +12.2% | +17.5% | -0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +9.0% | +13.2% | -0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +17.8% | +24.2% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | +7.8% | +2.5% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +136.8% | +38.8% | -9.2% | +101.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CNMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.2x trailing earnings, CNMD trades at a 17% valuation discount to HOLX's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNMD's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $3.7B | $17.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $4.2B | $17.6B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.22x | 29.26x | 30.53x | -115.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.71x | 15.46x | 17.21x | 370.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.69x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.17x | 13.06x | 17.39x | 77.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 2.45x | 4.14x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 2.38x | 3.43x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.78x | 17.24x | 18.44x | 29.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOLX delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-1 for ATRC. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNMD's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs ATRC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.4% | +8.9% | +11.0% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +5.2% | +6.1% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +7.2% | +9.4% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +7.9% | +8.8% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.57x | 0.52x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $794M | $450M | $667M | -$79M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $449M | $2.0B | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $835M | $898M | $2.6B | $88M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.20x | 10.74x | 8.00x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOLX five years ago would be worth $11,582 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,902 for CNMD. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +37.1% total return vs MMSI's -33.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOLX at -2.9% vs CNMD's -31.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.0% | -27.9% | +1.9% | -29.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.3% | -33.8% | +37.1% | -8.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.3% | -26.5% | -8.5% | -41.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | -3.6% | +15.8% | -64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.6% | +214.6% | +124.3% | +95.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.1% | -9.8% | -2.9% | -16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNMD's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs MMSI's 62.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.71x | 0.41x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.08 | $100.19 | $76.04 | $43.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.21 | $59.74 | $52.81 | $26.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.4% | +62.2% | +100.0% | +64.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 34.9 | 69.1 | 45.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 406K | 769K | 10.0M | 669K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNMD as "Hold", MMSI as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold", ATRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.8% upside for CNMD (target: $78) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). CNMD is the only dividend payer here at 2.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.00 | $95.00 | $79.00 | $50.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 13 | 42 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% | +0.8% |
HOLX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CNMD vs MMSI vs HOLX vs ATRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNMD or MMSI or HOLX or ATRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). CONMED Corporation (CNMD) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNMD or MMSI or HOLX or ATRC?
On trailing P/E, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) is the cheapest at 25.
2x versus Hologic, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, CONMED Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNMD or MMSI or HOLX or ATRC?
Over the past 5 years, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) delivered a total return of +15. 8%, compared to -71. 0% for CONMED Corporation (CNMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +214. 6% versus CNMD's +6. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNMD or MMSI or HOLX or ATRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus CONMED Corporation's 1. 34β — meaning CNMD is approximately 225% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 81% for CONMED Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNMD or MMSI or HOLX or ATRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to -64. 6% for CONMED Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATRC leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNMD or MMSI or HOLX or ATRC?
Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 8% net margin versus -2. 1% for AtriCure, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOLX leads at 17. 4% versus -0. 6% for ATRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATRC leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNMD or MMSI or HOLX or ATRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 362. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNMD: 104. 8% to $78. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNMD or MMSI or HOLX or ATRC?
In this comparison, CNMD (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MMSI, HOLX, ATRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNMD or MMSI or HOLX or ATRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +124. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOLX: +124. 3%, ATRC: +95. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNMD and MMSI and HOLX and ATRC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CNMD pays a dividend while MMSI, HOLX, ATRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.