Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNP vs PNW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
CNP vs PNW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $27.58B | $12.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.41B | $5.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.07B | $654M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 22.1x | 21.1x |
| Total Debt | $23.66B | $17.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $7M |
CNP vs PNW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint Energy,… (CNP) | 100 | 237.6 | +137.6% |
| Pinnacle West Capit… (PNW) | 100 | 127.8 | +27.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNP vs PNW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 1.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- 135.8% 10Y total return vs PNW's 78.9%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.03, current ratio 0.91x
PNW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.03, yield 3.5%
- Lower P/E (21.1x vs 22.1x)
- 12.0% margin vs CNP's 11.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% revenue growth vs PNW's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.1x vs 22.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.0% margin vs CNP's 11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (212.2% vs 251.8%) | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PNW's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.4% vs PNW's +10.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs PNW's 2.2%, ROIC 4.8% vs 3.9% |
CNP vs PNW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNP vs PNW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNP is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.4B annually — 1.7x PNW's $5.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.0% (PNW) to 11.4% (CNP). On growth, PNW holds the edge at +11.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.4B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.7B | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $654M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.7B | -$992M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +40.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.4% | -18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +7.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PNW leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, PNW trades at a 25% valuation discount to CNP's 26.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNP's 14.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PNW's 14.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.6B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51.2B | $29.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.40x | 19.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.12x | 21.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 28.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.06x | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.95x | 2.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.48x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CNP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNP delivers a 9.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for PNW. CNP carries lower financial leverage with a 2.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PNW's 2.52x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.12x | 2.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23.6B | $17.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23.7B | $17.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.38x | 2.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNP five years ago would be worth $18,832 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,591 for PNW. Over the past 12 months, CNP leads with a +10.4% total return vs PNW's +10.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNP at 13.9% vs PNW's 11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.7% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.4% | +10.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +38.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.3% | +35.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.8% | +78.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CNP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNP is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNW's -0.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | -0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.47 | $104.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.46 | $85.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 43.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CNP and PNW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNP as "Hold" and PNW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.6% upside for PNW (target: $103) vs 3.0% for CNP (target: $44). For income investors, PNW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.48% vs CNP's 2.07%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.50 | $103.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $3.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CNP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PNW leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CNP vs PNW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNP or PNW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
(CNP) is the stronger pick with 8. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW). Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) a "Hold" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNP or PNW?
On trailing P/E, Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW) is the cheapest at 19.
7x versus CenterPoint Energy, Inc. at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, Pinnacle West Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNP or PNW?
Over the past 5 years, CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
(CNP) delivered a total return of +88. 3%, compared to +35. 9% for Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNP returned +135. 8% versus PNW's +78. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNP or PNW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
(CNP) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Pinnacle West Capital Corporation's -0. 03β — meaning PNW is approximately -19% more volatile than CNP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Pinnacle West Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNP or PNW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
(CNP) is pulling ahead at 8. 3% versus 4. 2% for Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CenterPoint Energy, Inc. grew EPS 1. 3% year-over-year, compared to -3. 6% for Pinnacle West Capital Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PNW leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNP or PNW?
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
5% net margin versus 11. 2% for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNP leads at 22. 6% versus 20. 9% for PNW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNP leads at 28. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNP or PNW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW) trades at 21.
1x forward P/E versus 22. 1x for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNW: 3. 6% to $103. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNP or PNW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 1% for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP).
09Is CNP or PNW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
(CNP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 2. 1% yield, +135. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNP: +135. 8%, PNW: +78. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNP and PNW?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PNW is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.