Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CNR vs ARLP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CNR
Core Natural Resources, Inc.

Coal

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.49B
5Y Perf.+1200.4%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.

Coal

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.29B
5Y Perf.+706.0%

CNR vs ARLP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CNR logoCNR
ARLP logoARLP
IndustryCoalCoal
Market Cap$4.49B$3.29B
Revenue (TTM)$4.16B$2.17B
Net Income (TTM)$-153M$246M
Gross Margin-0.0%23.9%
Operating Margin-5.1%14.4%
Forward P/E24.3x11.2x
Total Debt$354M$480M
Cash & Equiv.$432M$71M

CNR vs ARLPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CNR
ARLP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Core Natural Resour… (CNR)1001300.4+1200.4%
Alliance Resource P… (ARLP)100806.0+706.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CNR vs ARLP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ARLP leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Core Natural Resources, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CNR
Core Natural Resources, Inc.
The Growth Play

CNR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 93.8%, EPS growth -130.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.2%
  • 321.6% 10Y total return vs ARLP's 195.5%
  • 93.8% revenue growth vs ARLP's -10.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
The Income Pick

ARLP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 10.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 2.10x
  • Beta 0.07, yield 10.3%, current ratio 2.10x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCNR logoCNR93.8% revenue growth vs ARLP's -10.4%
ValueARLP logoARLPLower P/E (11.2x vs 24.3x)
Quality / MarginsARLP logoARLP11.3% margin vs CNR's -3.7%
Stability / SafetyARLP logoARLPBeta 0.07 vs CNR's 0.20
DividendsARLP logoARLP10.3% yield, vs CNR's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)CNR logoCNR+18.2% vs ARLP's +3.9%
Efficiency (ROA)ARLP logoARLP8.6% ROA vs CNR's -2.5%, ROIC 12.9% vs -6.5%

CNR vs ARLP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CNRCore Natural Resources, Inc.
FY 2021
Windows Segment
41.6%$7.0B
Commercial Segment
34.0%$5.7B
Siding Segment
24.4%$4.1B
ARLPAlliance Resource Partners, L.P.
FY 2025
Coal Products and Services Revenue
91.4%$1.9B
Royalty
6.5%$138M
Product and Service, Other
4.2%$88M
Shipping and Handling
1.7%$37M
Coal Royalties
-3.8%$-80,471,000

CNR vs ARLP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARLPLAGGINGCNR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ARLP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CNR is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 1.9x ARLP's $2.2B. ARLP is the more profitable business, keeping 11.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNR's -3.7%. On growth, CNR holds the edge at +83.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCNR logoCNRCore Natural Reso…ARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.2B$2.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$410M$626M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$153M$246M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$21M$339M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-0.0%+23.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-5.1%+14.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.7%+11.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.5%+15.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+83.0%-4.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.5%-87.7%
ARLP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CNR and ARLP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ARLP's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNR's 10.9x.

MetricCNR logoCNRCore Natural Reso…ARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…
Market CapShares × price$4.5B$3.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.4B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-29.72x10.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.33x11.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.87x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.90x5.40x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.08x1.50x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.24x1.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF212.29x8.48x
Evenly matched — CNR and ARLP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ARLP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

ARLP delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CNR. CNR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARLP's 0.26x.

MetricCNR logoCNRCore Natural Reso…ARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.1%+13.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.5%+8.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.5%+12.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.6%+14.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.26x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$78M$409M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$432M$71M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$354M$480M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.57x7.19x
ARLP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CNR and ARLP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CNR five years ago would be worth $70,375 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $61,901 for ARLP. Over the past 12 months, CNR leads with a +18.2% total return vs ARLP's +3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARLP at 19.9% vs CNR's 13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCNR logoCNRCore Natural Reso…ARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.4%+12.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.2%+3.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.0%+72.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+603.8%+519.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+321.6%+195.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.2%+19.9%
Evenly matched — CNR and ARLP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ARLP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ARLP is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNR's 0.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARLP currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs CNR's 77.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCNR logoCNRCore Natural Reso…ARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.20x0.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$114.80$29.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$63.36$22.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+77.1%+86.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.744.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.0M380K
ARLP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ARLP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates CNR as "Buy" and ARLP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for CNR (target: $115) vs 17.4% for ARLP (target: $30). For income investors, ARLP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.28% vs CNR's 0.58%.

MetricCNR logoCNRCore Natural Reso…ARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$115.25$30.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1718
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+10.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.51$2.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.0%0.0%
ARLP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ARLP leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallAlliance Resource Partners,… (ARLP)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CNR vs ARLP: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CNR or ARLP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Core Natural Resources, Inc.

(CNR) is the stronger pick with 93. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP). Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CNR or ARLP?

On forward P/E, Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CNR or ARLP?

Over the past 5 years, Core Natural Resources, Inc.

(CNR) delivered a total return of +603. 8%, compared to +519. 0% for Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNR returned +321. 6% versus ARLP's +195. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CNR or ARLP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Core Natural Resources, Inc. 's 0. 20β — meaning CNR is approximately 179% more volatile than ARLP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 26% for Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CNR or ARLP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Core Natural Resources, Inc.

(CNR) is pulling ahead at 93. 8% versus -10. 4% for Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. grew EPS -12. 6% year-over-year, compared to -130. 9% for Core Natural Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNR leads at 22. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CNR or ARLP?

Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 2% net margin versus -3. 7% for Core Natural Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARLP leads at 17. 6% versus -5. 2% for CNR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARLP leads at 21. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CNR or ARLP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Core Natural Resources, Inc. — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNR: 30. 1% to $115. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CNR or ARLP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP) offers the highest yield at 10. 3%, versus 0. 6% for Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR).

09

Is CNR or ARLP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 10. 3% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARLP: +195. 5%, CNR: +321. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CNR and ARLP?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CNR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARLP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CNR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 41%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARLP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CNR and ARLP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CNR: 83.0% · ARLP: -4.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.