Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CNTA logo
CNTA
VERA logo
VERA
JPM logo
JPM
IMVT logo
IMVT
PRAX logo
PRAX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CNTA vs VERA vs JPM vs IMVT vs PRAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$6.15B
5Y Perf.+82.6%
VERA
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.46B
5Y Perf.+98.6%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+95.3%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-9.3%

CNTA vs VERA vs JPM vs IMVT vs PRAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CNTA logoCNTA
VERA logoVERA
JPM logoJPM
IMVT logoIMVT
PRAX logoPRAX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$6.15B$2.46B$896.00B$6.90B$7.70B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$280.33B$0.00$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-251M$-369M$57.05B$-506M$-327M
Gross Margin100.0%60.0%
Operating Margin-13.8%25.9%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$8M$77M$942.38B$72K$110K
Cash & Equiv.$61M$355M$343.34B$902M$357M

CNTA vs VERA vs JPM vs IMVT vs PRAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CNTA
VERA
JPM
IMVT
PRAX
StockMay 21Jun 26Return
Centessa Pharmaceut… (CNTA)100182.6+82.6%
Vera Therapeutics, … (VERA)100198.6+98.6%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100195.3+95.3%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100221.8+121.8%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10090.7-9.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CNTA vs VERA vs JPM vs IMVT vs PRAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Vera Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. PRAX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc
The Defensive Pick

CNTA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 8.57x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
VERA
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

VERA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 1.42, current ratio 13.64x
  • 35.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 20.4% margin vs CNTA's -13.2%
  • Beta 0.94 vs IMVT's 1.66
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +491.9% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVERA logoVERA35.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs CNTA's -13.2%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs IMVT's 1.66
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

CNTA vs VERA vs JPM vs IMVT vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CNTACentessa Pharmaceuticals plc
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$15M
VERAVera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M

CNTA vs VERA vs JPM vs IMVT vs PRAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNTA's -13.2%.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$280.3B$0$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$257M-$383M$81.4B-$532M-$357M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$251M-$369M$57.0B-$506M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$209M-$187M$100.9B-$407M-$283M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.2%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.9%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-160.0%-108.6%+16.0%-14.1%+2.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Market CapShares × price$6.1B$2.5B$896.0B$6.9B$7.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.1B$2.2B$1.50T$6.0B$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-27.21x-7.35x16.00x-12.14x-19.77x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue409.72x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.23x3.64x2.47x7.19x6.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VERA. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNTA scores 5/9 vs VERA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-60.4%-74.9%+15.9%-68.2%-43.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-44.2%-60.2%+1.3%-62.2%-40.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-51.2%-54.6%+4.5%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-35.7%-48.1%+8.9%-68.3%-49.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–951523
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.13x2.60x0.00x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$54M-$277M$599.0B-$902M-$357M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$61M$355M$343.3B$902M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$77M$942.4B$72,000$110,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-23.48x-31.22x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,580 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs IMVT's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+67.7%-29.5%-0.5%+29.8%-6.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+229.9%+52.1%+21.8%+110.9%+491.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+756.0%+280.7%+138.2%+55.0%+1757.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+58.9%+122.0%+118.2%+213.0%-14.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.6%+197.9%+465.8%+237.9%-36.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+104.6%+56.1%+33.6%+15.7%+164.8%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CNTA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNTA currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs VERA's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x1.42x0.94x1.66x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.25$56.05$337.25$36.27$366.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.77$19.07$262.71$14.32$37.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.7%+61.1%+95.1%+92.7%+72.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.146.959.157.931.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M1.1M7.0M1.9M396K
Evenly matched — CNTA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CNTA as "Buy", VERA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.5% upside for VERA (target: $80) vs -0.6% for CNTA (target: $40). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.50$80.33$339.75$43.67$607.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts1414612316
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CNTA vs VERA vs JPM vs IMVT vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CNTA or VERA or JPM or IMVT or PRAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc (CNTA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CNTA or VERA or JPM or IMVT or PRAX?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -14. 2% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PRAX's -36. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CNTA or VERA or JPM or IMVT or PRAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately 76% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CNTA or VERA or JPM or IMVT or PRAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc grew EPS 29. 1% year-over-year, compared to -69. 5% for Vera Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CNTA or VERA or JPM or IMVT or PRAX?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -1316. 9% for Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -1384. 6% for CNTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNTA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CNTA or VERA or JPM or IMVT or PRAX more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VERA: 134.

5% to $80. 33.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CNTA or VERA or JPM or IMVT or PRAX?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. CNTA, VERA, IMVT, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is CNTA or VERA or JPM or IMVT or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CNTA and VERA and JPM and IMVT and PRAX?

These companies operate in different sectors (CNTA (Healthcare) and VERA (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and IMVT (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CNTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VERA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while CNTA, VERA, IMVT, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.