CODX vs FLGT

For growth investors, Fulgent Genetics, Inc.

(FLGT) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -84. 1% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX). Analysts rate Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Co-Diagnostics, Inc.

(CODX) delivered a total return of -66. 8%, compared to -76. 7% for Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLGT returned +73. 9% versus CODX's -56. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fulgent Genetics, Inc.

(FLGT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Co-Diagnostics, Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning CODX is approximately 52% more volatile than FLGT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 6% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fulgent Genetics, Inc.

(FLGT) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -84. 1% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Co-Diagnostics, Inc. grew EPS 5. 2% year-over-year, compared to -39. 7% for Fulgent Genetics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLGT leads at -19. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fulgent Genetics, Inc.

(FLGT) is the more profitable company, earning -18. 8% net margin versus -75. 3% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -18. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLGT leads at -28. 2% versus -50. 3% for CODX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODX leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fulgent Genetics, Inc.

(FLGT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLGT: +73. 9%, CODX: -56. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.