Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

COFS vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
COFS
ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$471M
5Y Perf.+7.2%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$699M
5Y Perf.+149.8%
MBWM
Mercantile Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.+127.2%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.+191.2%

COFS vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
COFS logoCOFS
IBCP logoIBCP
MBWM logoMBWM
CZWI logoCZWI
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$471M$699M$898M$203M
Revenue (TTM)$193M$315M$372M$90M
Net Income (TTM)$28M$69M$89M$14M
Gross Margin58.2%69.6%64.0%54.7%
Operating Margin17.7%25.8%27.5%7.0%
Forward P/E8.7x9.7x9.6x11.8x
Total Debt$316M$117M$826M$52M
Cash & Equiv.$88M$52M$473M$119M

COFS vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

COFS
IBCP
MBWM
CZWI
StockMay 20May 26Return
ChoiceOne Financial… (COFS)100107.2+7.2%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100249.8+149.8%
Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM)100227.2+127.2%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100291.2+191.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: COFS vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: COFS leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Mercantile Bank Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CZWI also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
COFS
ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

COFS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.

  • 38.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
  • Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.8x)
  • 3.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0%
Best for: growth and value
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
  • NIM 3.3% vs CZWI's 2.9%
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
MBWM
Mercantile Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

MBWM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 10.8%
  • 178.2% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 184.6%
  • PEG 0.64 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.46 vs COFS's 0.95, lower leverage
  • +45.6% vs IBCP's +12.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOFS logoCOFS38.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueCOFS logoCOFSLower P/E (8.7x vs 11.8x)
Quality / MarginsMBWM logoMBWMEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCZWI logoCZWIBeta 0.46 vs COFS's 0.95, lower leverage
DividendsCOFS logoCOFS3.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+45.6% vs IBCP's +12.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MBWM logoMBWMEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5%

COFS vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

COFSChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Interchange Income
70.5%$8M
Trust Fee Income
22.8%$3M
Other Charges and Fees for Customer Services
6.8%$751,000
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
MBWMMercantile Bank Corporation
FY 2025
Credit and Debit Card
42.4%$9M
Service Charges on Deposit and Sweep Accounts
37.5%$8M
Payroll Processing
16.0%$3M
Customer Service
4.0%$876,000
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M

COFS vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBCPLAGGINGMBWM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — IBCP and MBWM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

MBWM is the larger business by revenue, generating $372M annually — 4.1x CZWI's $90M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COFS's 14.6%.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$193M$315M$372M$90M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$49M$89M$107M$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$28M$69M$89M$14M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$12M$70M$11M$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.2%+69.6%+64.0%+54.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.7%+25.8%+27.5%+7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.6%+21.7%+23.9%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.4%+22.2%+3.0%+11.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.5%+2.3%+14.8%+63.0%
Evenly matched — IBCP and MBWM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 39% valuation discount to COFS's 15.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Market CapShares × price$471M$699M$898M$203M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$699M$764M$1.3B$136M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.67x10.38x9.53x14.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.73x9.72x9.56x11.76x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.97x0.63x2.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.45x9.39x11.75x15.28x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.44x2.22x2.42x2.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.95x1.41x1.17x1.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.73x9.96x80.15x19.55x
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for COFS. IBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.4%+14.2%+13.5%+7.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+1.3%+1.4%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.1%+10.2%+5.5%+2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.5%+2.6%+8.0%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94846
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.68x0.23x1.14x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$228M$65M$353M-$67M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$88M$52M$473M$119M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$316M$117M$826M$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.52x0.91x0.79x0.16x
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MBWM five years ago would be worth $17,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,704 for COFS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs IBCP's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs COFS's 17.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.7%+7.2%+10.1%+21.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+15.0%+12.6%+23.6%+45.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.3%+130.6%+127.3%+160.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+47.0%+63.7%+78.4%+71.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+102.0%+184.6%+178.2%+157.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.3%+32.1%+31.5%+37.5%
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MBWM and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COFS's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MBWM currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs COFS's 89.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.94x0.81x0.86x0.45x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.40$37.39$55.77$22.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.10$29.63$42.17$12.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.0%+90.8%+93.3%+93.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.450.653.163.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded75K176K112K40K
Evenly matched — MBWM and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — COFS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: COFS as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", MBWM as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 7.9% for COFS (target: $34). For income investors, COFS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs CZWI's 1.76%.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.00$38.00$57.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3772
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%+3.0%+2.8%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises51167
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.21$1.03$1.47$0.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+1.8%0.0%+3.1%
Evenly matched — COFS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallIndependent Bank Corporation (IBCP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

COFS vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is COFS or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.

(COFS) is the stronger pick with 38. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. (COFS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — COFS or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?

On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.

5x versus ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. at 15. 7x. On forward P/E, ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mercantile Bank Corporation wins at 0. 64x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — COFS or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?

Over the past 5 years, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) delivered a total return of +78.

4%, compared to +47. 0% for ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. (COFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +188. 6% versus COFS's +101. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — COFS or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning COFS is approximately 107% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — COFS or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.

(COFS) is pulling ahead at 38. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercantile Bank Corporation grew EPS 10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — COFS or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?

Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

9% net margin versus 14. 6% for ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is COFS or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 64x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. (COFS) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 11. 9% to $38. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — COFS or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. (COFS) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).

09

Is COFS or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 8% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, COFS: +101. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between COFS and IBCP and MBWM and CZWI?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: COFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

COFS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBCP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MBWM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CZWI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform COFS and IBCP and MBWM and CZWI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(COFS: 38.7% · IBCP: -0.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(COFS: 14.6% · IBCP: 21.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(COFS: 15.7x · IBCP: 10.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.