Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
COGT vs ALGS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
COGT vs ALGS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5.94B | $37M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-354M | $-90M |
| Gross Margin | — | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -51.0% |
| Total Debt | $253M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $312M | $18M |
COGT vs ALGS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cogent Biosciences,… (COGT) | 100 | 282.4 | +182.4% |
| Aligos Therapeutics… (ALGS) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COGT vs ALGS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COGT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.61
- -21.7% 10Y total return vs ALGS's -98.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.61, Low D/E 39.8%, current ratio 14.23x
ALGS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -44.6%, EPS growth 88.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -46.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -33.7% revenue growth vs ALGS's -44.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs ALGS's -48.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.61 vs ALGS's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.4% vs ALGS's +38.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -55.8% ROA vs ALGS's -90.6%, ROIC -66.4% vs -163.0% |
COGT vs ALGS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
COGT vs ALGS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALGS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALGS and COGT operate at a comparable scale, with $2M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$362M | -$94M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$354M | -$90M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$286M | -$85M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +72.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -51.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -48.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -45.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.4% | -4.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — COGT and ALGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.9B | $37M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $24M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.64x | -2.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 17.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.70x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
COGT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COGT delivers a -83.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-83 in annual profit, vs $-139 for ALGS. ALGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COGT's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COGT scores 4/9 vs ALGS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -83.3% | -139.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -55.8% | -90.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -66.4% | -163.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.2% | -152.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $312M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $253M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -84.69x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COGT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COGT five years ago would be worth $41,865 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $89 for ALGS. Over the past 12 months, COGT leads with a +637.1% total return vs ALGS's +38.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COGT at 43.2% vs ALGS's -41.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.1% | -34.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +637.1% | +38.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.8% | -80.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +318.7% | -99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.7% | -98.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.2% | -41.9% |
Risk & Volatility
COGT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COGT is the less volatile stock with a 1.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALGS's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COGT currently trades 79.6% from its 52-week high vs ALGS's 44.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.73 | $13.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.55 | $4.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.6% | +44.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 204K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.13 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
COGT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ALGS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
COGT vs ALGS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COGT or ALGS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
(COGT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — COGT or ALGS?
Over the past 5 years, Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
(COGT) delivered a total return of +318. 7%, compared to -99. 1% for Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COGT returned -21. 7% versus ALGS's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — COGT or ALGS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
(COGT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 61β versus Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning ALGS is approximately 31% more volatile than COGT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 40% for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — COGT or ALGS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aligos Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for Cogent Biosciences, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — COGT or ALGS?
Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
(COGT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1106. 7% for Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COGT leads at 0. 0% versus -40. 2% for ALGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALGS leads at 57. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — COGT or ALGS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is COGT or ALGS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
(COGT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COGT: -21. 7%, ALGS: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between COGT and ALGS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.