COLM vs VFC vs UAA vs DECK vs WWW

For growth investors, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the stronger pick with 16.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.

(WWW) is the cheapest at 0. 2x versus Columbia Sportswear Company at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deckers Outdoor Corporation wins at 0. 47x versus Columbia Sportswear Company's 1. 23x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) delivered a total return of +80.

6%, compared to -73. 9% for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DECK returned +986. 8% versus UAA's -83. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

17β versus V. F. Corporation's 2. 36β — meaning VFC is approximately 102% more volatile than COLM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 4% for V. F. Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is pulling ahead at 16.

3% versus -9. 4% for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wolverine World Wide, Inc. grew EPS 159. 5% year-over-year, compared to -190. 4% for Under Armour, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DECK leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

4% net margin versus -3. 9% for Under Armour, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DECK leads at 23. 6% versus -3. 6% for UAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DECK leads at 57. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus Columbia Sportswear Company's 1. 23x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 55. 0x for Under Armour, Inc. — 42. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WWW: 25. 4% to $21. 33.

In this comparison, WWW (2.

4% yield), COLM (1. 9% yield), VFC (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. UAA, DECK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

17), 1. 9% yield). V. F. Corporation (VFC) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COLM: +25. 9%, VFC: -45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: COLM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VFC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WWW is a small-cap deep-value stock. COLM, VFC, WWW pay a dividend while UAA, DECK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.