COMP
Compass, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.-61.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
COMP vs ZG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$10.55B
5Y Perf.-67.1%
COMP vs ZG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | COMP | ZG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $4.08B | $10.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.31B | $2.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 74.1% |
| Operating Margin | -4.2% | -1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 44.4x | 19.7x |
| Total Debt | $454M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $199M | $768M |
COMP vs ZG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
COMP
ZG
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG) | 100 | 32.9 | -67.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COMP vs ZG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: COMP and ZG are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Zillow Group, Inc. Class A is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
COMP
Compass, Inc.
The Growth Play
COMP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 23.7% revenue growth vs ZG's 15.5%
- -8.2% vs ZG's -34.5%
Best for: growth exposure
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A
The Income Pick
ZG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.32
- 59.6% 10Y total return vs COMP's -64.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 3.13x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | COMP | 23.7% revenue growth vs ZG's 15.5% |
| Value | ZG | Lower P/E (19.7x vs 44.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | ZG | 0.9% margin vs COMP's 0.2% |
| Stability / Safety | ZG | Beta 1.32 vs COMP's 1.79, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | COMP | -8.2% vs ZG's -34.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | COMP | 0.4% ROA vs ZG's 0.4%, ROIC -2.5% vs -0.6% |
COMP vs ZG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
COMP vs ZG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCOMPLAGGINGZG
ZGZillow Group, Inc. Cl…
2leads
COMPCompass, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ZGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ZG4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
COMP3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ZG6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
COMP5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 3.2x ZG's $2.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.9% (ZG) to 0.2% (COMP). On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | COMPCompass, Inc. | ZGZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.3B | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$100M | -$34M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $235M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +74.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | -1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +99.4% | +18.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +133.3% | +104.5% |
ZG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COMPCompass, Inc. | ZGZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -72.60x | 487.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.40x | 19.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 51.99x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 4.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.27x | 2.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.07x | 44.90x |
COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZG leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COMP delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $0 for ZG. ZG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COMP's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZG scores 7/9 vs COMP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | COMPCompass, Inc. | ZGZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | -0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $255M | -$675M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $199M | $768M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $454M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.12x | — |
ZG leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COMP five years ago would be worth $4,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,807 for ZG. Over the past 12 months, COMP leads with a -8.2% total return vs ZG's -34.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 42.9% vs ZG's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | COMPCompass, Inc. | ZGZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.9% | -33.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.2% | -34.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.6% | -8.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.5% | -61.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.0% | +59.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.9% | -2.9% |
COMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — COMP and ZG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZG is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COMP's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COMP currently trades 52.0% from its 52-week high vs ZG's 48.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | COMPCompass, Inc. | ZGZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.96 | $90.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.66 | $39.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.0% | +48.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.1M | 987K |
Evenly matched — COMP and ZG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates COMP as "Buy" and ZG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.8% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 61.1% for ZG (target: $71).
| Metric | COMPCompass, Inc. | ZGZillow Group, Inc… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.29 | $70.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.4% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ZG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COMP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallCompass, Inc. (COMP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
COMP vs ZG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COMP or ZG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 5% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG). Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) offers the better valuation at 487. 6x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COMP or ZG?
On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A is actually cheaper at 19. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COMP or ZG?
Over the past 5 years, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) delivered a total return of -57. 5%, compared to -61. 9% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZG returned +59. 6% versus COMP's -64. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COMP or ZG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Compass, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning COMP is approximately 36% more volatile than ZG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 58% for Compass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COMP or ZG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus 15. 5% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class A grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to 67. 7% for Compass, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZG leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COMP or ZG?
Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -0. 8% for Compass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COMP leads at -0. 4% versus -1. 3% for ZG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZG leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COMP or ZG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 4x for Compass, Inc. — 24. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 96. 8% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — COMP or ZG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is COMP or ZG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Compass, Inc. (COMP) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZG: +59. 6%, COMP: -64. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COMP and ZG?
These companies operate in different sectors (COMP (Technology) and ZG (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
Revenue Growth>
%
(COMP: 99.4% · ZG: 18.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.