CON
Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.
Medical - Equipment & Services
Market Cap$2.92B
5Y Perf.-2.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CON vs AMSF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
Insurance - Specialty
Market Cap$559M
5Y Perf.-37.4%
CON vs AMSF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CON | AMSF |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Equipment & Services | Insurance - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $2.92B | $559M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.09B | $325M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $153M | $46M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $491K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $62M |
CON vs AMSF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CON
AMSF
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentra Group Hol… (CON) | 100 | 97.9 | -2.1% |
| AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CON vs AMSF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AMSF leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CON
Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.
The Income Pick
CON is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 52.8%
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth -8.5%
- Beta 0.69, yield 52.8%, current ratio 1.42x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
The Insurance Pick
AMSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 34.7% 10Y total return vs CON's 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 15.6x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CON | 3.4% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6% |
| Value | AMSF | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 15.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMSF | 14.3% margin vs CON's 7.3% |
| Stability / Safety | AMSF | Beta 0.23 vs CON's 0.69, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CON | 52.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AMSF's 8.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CON | +6.9% vs AMSF's -30.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMSF | 5.6% ROA vs CON's 5.4%, ROIC 21.9% vs 11.1% |
CON vs AMSF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCONLAGGINGAMSF
AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
2leads
CONConcentra Group Holdi…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AMSFMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
AMSF4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMSF7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CON5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CON2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CON and AMSF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CON is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 6.4x AMSF's $325M. AMSF is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CON's 7.3%. On growth, CON holds the edge at +17.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CONConcentra Group H… | AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $325M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $395M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $153M | $46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $176M | $8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +47.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.0% | +10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | -8.5% |
Evenly matched — CON and AMSF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
AMSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, AMSF trades at a 31% valuation discount to CON's 17.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMSF's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CON's 12.6x.
| Metric | CONConcentra Group H… | AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $559M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $497M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.55x | 12.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.63x | 14.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.62x | 8.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.54x | 1.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.79x | 2.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.90x | 62.63x |
AMSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSF leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CON delivers a 37.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $10 for AMSF. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CON's 6.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSF scores 7/9 vs CON's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CONConcentra Group H… | AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +37.4% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.1% | +21.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.53x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | -$61M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $62M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $491,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.09x | — |
AMSF leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CON five years ago would be worth $10,318 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,055 for AMSF. Over the past 12 months, CON leads with a +6.9% total return vs AMSF's -30.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CON at 1.0% vs AMSF's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CONConcentra Group H… | AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.9% | -30.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | -26.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | -19.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | +34.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.0% | -9.6% |
CON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CON and AMSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CON's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CON currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs AMSF's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CONConcentra Group H… | AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.68 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.55 | $29.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +61.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 36.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 638K | 210K |
Evenly matched — CON and AMSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CON as "Buy" and AMSF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.7% upside for AMSF (target: $45) vs 35.8% for CON (target: $31). For income investors, CON offers the higher dividend yield at 52.80% vs AMSF's 8.57%.
| Metric | CONConcentra Group H… | AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.00 | $44.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +52.8% | +8.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $12.05 | $2.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +2.2% |
CON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AMSF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CON leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallConcentra Group Holdings Pa… (CON)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CON vs AMSF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CON or AMSF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.
(CON) is the stronger pick with 3. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CON or AMSF?
On trailing P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. at 17. 6x. On forward P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CON or AMSF?
Over the past 5 years, Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.
(CON) delivered a total return of +3. 2%, compared to -19. 4% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMSF returned +34. 7% versus CON's +3. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CON or AMSF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. 's 0. 69β — meaning CON is approximately 199% more volatile than AMSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 7% for Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CON or AMSF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.
(CON) is pulling ahead at 3. 4% versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. grew EPS -8. 5% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CON or AMSF?
AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 9% net margin versus 8. 8% for Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMSF leads at 18. 6% versus 16. 0% for CON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSF leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CON or AMSF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 15. 6x for Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSF: 49. 7% to $44. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CON or AMSF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON) offers the highest yield at 52. 8%, versus 8. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF).
09Is CON or AMSF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +34. 7%, CON: +3. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CON and AMSF?
These companies operate in different sectors (CON (Healthcare) and AMSF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CON: 17.0% · AMSF: 10.3%)Net Margin>
%
(CON: 7.3% · AMSF: 14.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CON: 17.6x · AMSF: 12.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.