Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
COO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs BLCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
COO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs BLCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $11.97B | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $5.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.15B | $0.00 | $1.56B | $5.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $401M | $-168M | $153M | $-219M |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | — | 65.4% | 55.9% |
| Operating Margin | 17.2% | — | 12.3% | 5.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.2x | — | 24.8x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.78B | $22M | $70M | $5.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $194M | $1.12B | $383M |
COO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs BLCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Cooper Companie… (COO) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 132.4 | +32.4% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 118.6 | +18.6% |
| Bausch + Lomb Corpo… (BLCO) | 100 | 93.5 | -6.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs BLCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.93
- Beta 0.93, current ratio 1.89x
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 20.1x)
- Beta 0.93 vs BLCO's 1.39, lower leverage
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs COO's -24.8%
ALKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- -11.0% 10Y total return vs COO's 57.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs BLCO's -4.2%
- 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
BLCO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.5%, EPS growth -13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- 6.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs BLCO's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs BLCO's 1.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs COO's -24.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
COO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs BLCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
COO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs BLCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
DBVT leads 1 • COO leads 0 • BLCO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLCO and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $5.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLCO's -4.2%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $0 | $1.6B | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | -$112M | $212M | $724M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $401M | -$168M | $153M | -$219M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $333M | -$151M | $392M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | — | +65.4% | +55.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | — | +12.3% | +5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | — | +9.8% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | — | +25.1% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.2% | — | +28.2% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.9% | +91.5% | -4.1% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — COO and BLCO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.8x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 24% valuation discount to COO's 32.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COO's 13.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BLCO's 17.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.0B | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.6B | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $10.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.68x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -15.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.24x | — | — | 20.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.24x | — | 17.25x | 17.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.93x | — | 4.00x | 1.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 0.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.60x | — | 12.28x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLCO's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs BLCO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.8% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | — | +18.9% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | -145.7% | +14.2% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | -$172M | -$1.0B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $194M | $1.1B | $383M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $22M | $70M | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.40x | -189.82x | 32.30x | 0.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs COO's -24.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs COO's -14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.7% | +4.9% | +25.3% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.8% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +39.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.7% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -13.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.5% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -20.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.9% | -87.0% | -11.0% | -20.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.1% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — COO and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COO is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLCO's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs COO's 68.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $89.83 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $18.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $60.00 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $10.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.0% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.7 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 252K | 2.3M | 412K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COO as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", BLCO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 19.5% for BLCO (target: $19).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $93.86 | $46.33 | $44.00 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 15 | 28 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DBVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
COO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs BLCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COO or DBVT or ALKS or BLCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bausch + Lomb Corporation (BLCO) is the stronger pick with 6.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COO or DBVT or ALKS or BLCO?
On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 24.
8x versus The Cooper Companies, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, The Cooper Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COO or DBVT or ALKS or BLCO?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COO returned +57. 9% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COO or DBVT or ALKS or BLCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cooper Companies, Inc.
(COO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Bausch + Lomb Corporation's 1. 39β — meaning BLCO is approximately 50% more volatile than COO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 82% for Bausch + Lomb Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COO or DBVT or ALKS or BLCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bausch + Lomb Corporation (BLCO) is pulling ahead at 6.
5% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Cooper Companies, Inc. grew EPS -4. 6% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLCO leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COO or DBVT or ALKS or BLCO?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -7. 1% for Bausch + Lomb Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COO or DBVT or ALKS or BLCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Cooper Companies, Inc.
(COO) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Bausch + Lomb Corporation — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — COO or DBVT or ALKS or BLCO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is COO or DBVT or ALKS or BLCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cooper Companies, Inc.
(COO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COO: +57. 9%, BLCO: -20. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COO and DBVT and ALKS and BLCO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.