Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

COOT vs MGPI vs ADM vs BG vs INGR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-60.8%
MGPI
MGP Ingredients, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$408M
5Y Perf.-77.8%
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company

Agricultural Farm Products

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$37.36B
5Y Perf.+23.4%
BG
Bunge Global S.A.

Agricultural Farm Products

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.02B
5Y Perf.+20.8%
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.77B
5Y Perf.-8.1%

COOT vs MGPI vs ADM vs BG vs INGR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
COOT logoCOOT
MGPI logoMGPI
ADM logoADM
BG logoBG
INGR logoINGR
IndustryPackaged FoodsBeverages - Wineries & DistilleriesAgricultural Farm ProductsAgricultural Farm ProductsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$18M$408M$37.36B$24.02B$6.77B
Revenue (TTM)$38M$521M$80.61B$80.54B$7.22B
Net Income (TTM)$-25M$-240M$1.08B$686M$729M
Gross Margin9.5%36.4%5.8%5.2%25.3%
Operating Margin-2.3%-51.2%1.5%2.4%14.1%
Forward P/E12.1x18.6x14.4x9.6x
Total Debt$18M$267M$8.41B$16.95B$1.79B
Cash & Equiv.$514K$18M$1.01B$1.14B$1.03B

COOT vs MGPI vs ADM vs BG vs INGRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

COOT
MGPI
ADM
BG
INGR
StockMar 24May 26Return
Australian Oilseeds… (COOT)10039.2-60.8%
MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI)10022.2-77.8%
Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM)100123.4+23.4%
Bunge Global S.A. (BG)100120.8+20.8%
Ingredion Incorpora… (INGR)10091.9-8.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: COOT vs MGPI vs ADM vs BG vs INGR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INGR leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Bunge Global S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. ADM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
The Consumer Defensive Pick

COOT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
MGPI
MGP Ingredients, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, MGPI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
The Income Pick

ADM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
  • 147.4% 10Y total return vs BG's 140.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
  • Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 11.20x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
The Growth Play

BG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
  • 32.4% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
  • +66.8% vs MGPI's -38.0%
Best for: growth exposure
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
The Value Play

INGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (9.6x vs 14.4x)
  • 10.1% margin vs COOT's -66.0%
  • 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
  • 9.4% ROA vs COOT's -80.4%, ROIC 15.5% vs 10.0%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBG logoBG32.4% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
ValueINGR logoINGRLower P/E (9.6x vs 14.4x)
Quality / MarginsINGR logoINGR10.1% margin vs COOT's -66.0%
Stability / SafetyADM logoADMBeta 0.12 vs COOT's 0.80, lower leverage
DividendsINGR logoINGR3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BG logoBG+66.8% vs MGPI's -38.0%
Efficiency (ROA)INGR logoINGR9.4% ROA vs COOT's -80.4%, ROIC 15.5% vs 10.0%

COOT vs MGPI vs ADM vs BG vs INGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

MGPIMGP Ingredients, Inc.
FY 2025
Branded Spirits
43.4%$233M
Distilling Solutions
33.8%$181M
Ingredient Solutions
22.8%$122M
ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Company
FY 2025
Ag Services and Oilseeds
77.1%$61.6B
Carbohydrate Solutions
13.5%$10.7B
Nutrition
9.4%$7.5B
BGBunge Global S.A.
FY 2025
Milling Products
99.8%$1.5B
Other Products
0.2%$3M
INGRIngredion Incorporated
FY 2020
E M E A Segment
100.0%$593M

COOT vs MGPI vs ADM vs BG vs INGR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINGRLAGGINGCOOT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 2126.6x COOT's $38M. INGR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COOT's -66.0%. On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …ADM logoADMArcher-Daniels-Mi…BG logoBGBunge Global S.A.INGR logoINGRIngredion Incorpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$38M$521M$80.6B$80.5B$7.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$492,185-$249M$3.0B$2.8B$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$25M-$240M$1.1B$686M$729M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M$54M$4.8B$112M$809M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+9.5%+36.4%+5.8%+5.2%+25.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.3%-51.2%+1.5%+2.4%+14.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-66.0%-46.0%+1.3%+0.9%+10.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-27.0%+10.4%+6.0%+0.1%+11.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-12.5%+1.6%+87.8%-2.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.0%+1.6%-76.4%+79.0%
INGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MGPI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.6x trailing earnings, INGR trades at a 72% valuation discount to ADM's 34.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INGR's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BG's 22.6x.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …ADM logoADMArcher-Daniels-Mi…BG logoBGBunge Global S.A.INGR logoINGRIngredion Incorpo…
Market CapShares × price$18M$408M$37.4B$24.0B$6.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$31M$656M$44.8B$39.8B$7.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.23x-3.83x34.77x25.16x9.61x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.10x18.63x14.38x9.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.83x17.18x22.60x5.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.11x0.76x0.47x0.34x0.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share19.66x0.57x1.63x1.18x1.60x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.37x8.89x13.25x
MGPI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INGR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

INGR delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-5 for COOT. ADM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COOT's 19.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INGR scores 8/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …ADM logoADMArcher-Daniels-Mi…BG logoBGBunge Global S.A.INGR logoINGRIngredion Incorpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.8%-32.1%+4.7%+4.3%+17.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-80.4%-19.1%+2.2%+1.6%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.0%-6.7%+3.3%+3.3%+15.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+19.3%-8.1%+4.2%+4.5%+16.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–924628
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage19.90x0.37x0.37x0.97x0.41x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$18M$248M$7.4B$15.8B$760M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$514,140$18M$1.0B$1.1B$1.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$18M$267M$8.4B$17.0B$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-16.29x-40.23x3.03x3.10x27.32x
INGR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BG five years ago would be worth $14,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $839 for COOT. Over the past 12 months, BG leads with a +66.8% total return vs MGPI's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BG at 13.5% vs COOT's -56.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …ADM logoADMArcher-Daniels-Mi…BG logoBGBunge Global S.A.INGR logoINGRIngredion Incorpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.0%-20.3%+32.2%+34.4%-0.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-16.6%-38.0%+66.2%+66.8%-18.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.6%-79.8%+10.7%+46.3%+7.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.6%-66.0%+29.2%+49.4%+28.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.6%-17.3%+147.4%+140.3%+13.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-56.2%-41.3%+3.4%+13.5%+2.6%
BG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ADM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ADM is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COOT's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADM currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs COOT's 14.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …ADM logoADMArcher-Daniels-Mi…BG logoBGBunge Global S.A.INGR logoINGRIngredion Incorpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.80x0.63x0.12x0.25x0.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.50$34.99$81.75$133.93$141.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.41$16.45$46.81$71.60$100.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+14.4%+54.6%+94.8%+92.4%+75.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.147.668.451.827.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded324K279K3.8M1.7M585K
ADM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ADM and INGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MGPI as "Buy", ADM as "Hold", BG as "Buy", INGR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.9% upside for MGPI (target: $29) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, INGR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.01% vs BG's 2.23%.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…MGPI logoMGPIMGP Ingredients, …ADM logoADMArcher-Daniels-Mi…BG logoBGBunge Global S.A.INGR logoINGRIngredion Incorpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$60.00$133.67$124.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts14362521
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+2.6%+2.2%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises23153
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.48$2.04$2.76$3.24
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%0.0%+2.3%+3.3%
Evenly matched — ADM and INGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

INGR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MGPI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallIngredion Incorporated (INGR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

COOT vs MGPI vs ADM vs BG vs INGR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is COOT or MGPI or ADM or BG or INGR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bunge Global S.

A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — COOT or MGPI or ADM or BG or INGR?

On trailing P/E, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the cheapest at 9.

6x versus Archer-Daniels-Midland Company at 34. 8x. On forward P/E, Ingredion Incorporated is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — COOT or MGPI or ADM or BG or INGR?

Over the past 5 years, Bunge Global S.

A. (BG) delivered a total return of +49. 4%, compared to -91. 6% for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (COOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADM returned +147. 4% versus COOT's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — COOT or MGPI or ADM or BG or INGR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

12β versus Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares's 0. 80β — meaning COOT is approximately 596% more volatile than ADM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 20% for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — COOT or MGPI or ADM or BG or INGR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.

A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ingredion Incorporated grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1525. 8% for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, COOT leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — COOT or MGPI or ADM or BG or INGR?

Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

1% net margin versus -64. 2% for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INGR leads at 14. 4% versus -17. 6% for MGPI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGPI leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is COOT or MGPI or ADM or BG or INGR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) trades at 9.

6x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGPI: 51. 9% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — COOT or MGPI or ADM or BG or INGR?

In this comparison, INGR (3.

0% yield), ADM (2. 6% yield), MGPI (2. 5% yield), BG (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. COOT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is COOT or MGPI or ADM or BG or INGR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

12), 2. 6% yield, +147. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADM: +147. 4%, COOT: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between COOT and MGPI and ADM and BG and INGR?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: COOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; INGR is a small-cap deep-value stock. MGPI, ADM, BG, INGR pay a dividend while COOT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

COOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGPI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ADM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 43%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INGR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform COOT and MGPI and ADM and BG and INGR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(COOT: 16.3% · MGPI: -12.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.