Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
COPL vs NHIC vs BN vs ACIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Insurance - Property & Casualty
COPL vs NHIC vs BN vs ACIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management | Asset Management | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $52K | $220M | $104.40B | $525M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $77.66B | $335M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-825.00 | $3M | $1.31B | $107M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 40.0% | 63.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 39.9% | 42.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 524.4x | 16.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $73.00 | $0.00 | $263.42B | $152M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $986K | $16.24B | $199M |
COPL vs NHIC vs BN vs ACIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copley Acquisition … (COPL) | 100 | 103.0 | +3.0% |
| NewHold Investment … (NHIC) | 100 | 102.3 | +2.3% |
| Brookfield Corporat… (BN) | 100 | 106.3 | +6.3% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COPL vs NHIC vs BN vs ACIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COPL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NHIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, current ratio 9.74x
- Beta 0.03, current ratio 9.74x
- Beta 0.03 vs BN's 1.57
BN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.57
- 308.9% 10Y total return vs NHIC's 6.1%
- +25.5% vs ACIC's -0.3%
ACIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.1%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- 13.1% revenue growth vs BN's -9.7%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 524.4x)
- 31.9% margin vs NHIC's 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.1% revenue growth vs BN's -9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 524.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs NHIC's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs BN's 1.57 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.5% vs ACIC's -0.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs COPL's -189.2% |
COPL vs NHIC vs BN vs ACIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACIC leads in 3 of 6 categories
COPL leads 0 • NHIC leads 0 • BN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BN and NHIC operate at a comparable scale, with $77.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACIC is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BN's 1.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $77.7B | $335M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $833,081 | $32.1B | $154M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $3M | $1.3B | $107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M | -$2.8B | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +40.0% | +63.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +39.9% | +42.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +1.7% | +31.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +73.1% | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BN and ACIC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.0x trailing earnings, ACIC trades at a 100% valuation discount to BN's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACIC's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BN's 8.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $51,850 | $220M | $104.4B | $525M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51,923 | $219M | $351.6B | $478M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -61.00x | 524.38x | 9999.00x | 5.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.78x | 7.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.53x | 2.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 1.34x | 1.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.07x | 0.66x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 7.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $1 for BN. ACIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BN's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACIC scores 6/9 vs COPL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +1.6% | +0.8% | +35.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -189.2% | +1.5% | +0.3% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.7% | +5.6% | +41.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -0.9% | +7.2% | +26.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.59x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $73 | -$986,000 | $247.2B | -$46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $986,000 | $16.2B | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73 | $0 | $263.4B | $152M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 1.64x | 14.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $20,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,349 for COPL. Over the past 12 months, BN leads with a +25.5% total return vs ACIC's -0.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACIC at 37.3% vs COPL's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +1.7% | -0.1% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.5% | +5.2% | +25.5% | -0.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +6.1% | +122.1% | +159.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +6.1% | +89.3% | +107.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +6.1% | +308.9% | -22.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | +2.0% | +30.5% | +37.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — COPL and NHIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COPL is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BN's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NHIC currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs ACIC's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 0.03x | 1.55x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.69 | $10.87 | $49.57 | $13.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.01 | $9.99 | $36.47 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +97.0% | +93.8% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.1 | 69.1 | 62.5 | 31.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 20K | 5.9M | 188K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BN as "Buy", ACIC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.0% upside for BN (target: $54) vs -82.5% for ACIC (target: $2).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $54.40 | $1.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACIC leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
COPL vs NHIC vs BN vs ACIC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COPL or NHIC or BN or ACIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the stronger pick with 13.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Brookfield Corporation (BN). American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) offers the better valuation at 5. 0x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Corporation (BN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COPL or NHIC or BN or ACIC?
On trailing P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the cheapest at 5.
0x versus Brookfield Corporation at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COPL or NHIC or BN or ACIC?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +107.
0%, compared to +3. 5% for Copley Acquisition Corp (COPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BN returned +313. 6% versus ACIC's -24. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COPL or NHIC or BN or ACIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copley Acquisition Corp (COPL) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Brookfield Corporation's 1. 55β — meaning BN is approximately -6538% more volatile than COPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 159% for Brookfield Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COPL or NHIC or BN or ACIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is pulling ahead at 13.
1% versus -9. 7% for Brookfield Corporation (BN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NewHold Investment Corp III grew EPS 131. 2% year-over-year, compared to -99. 8% for Brookfield Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COPL or NHIC or BN or ACIC?
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
8% net margin versus 0. 0% for NewHold Investment Corp III — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACIC leads at 42. 6% versus 0. 0% for NHIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COPL or NHIC or BN or ACIC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) trades at 7.
5x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Brookfield Corporation — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BN: 17. 0% to $54. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — COPL or NHIC or BN or ACIC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is COPL or NHIC or BN or ACIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Copley Acquisition Corp (COPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02)). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COPL: +3. 5%, BN: +313. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COPL and NHIC and BN and ACIC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: COPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NHIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.