Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CORT vs INVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CORT vs INVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5.60B | $1.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $769M | $424M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $48M | $504M |
| Gross Margin | 98.3% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.1% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 138.9x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $120M | $551M |
CORT vs INVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corcept Therapeutic… (CORT) | 100 | 344.5 | +244.5% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 161.2 | +61.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CORT vs INVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CORT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.9% 10Y total return vs INVA's 90.5%
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.13
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs CORT's 12.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 138.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs CORT's 6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs CORT's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.4% vs CORT's -26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs CORT's 5.8%, ROIC 14.2% vs 6.2% |
CORT vs INVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CORT vs INVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CORT is the larger business by revenue, generating $769M annually — 1.8x INVA's $424M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CORT's 6.2%. On growth, INVA holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $769M | $424M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $48M | $504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $120M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.3% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +118.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +42.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
INVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.8x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 89% valuation discount to CORT's 63.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INVA's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CORT's 117.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.6B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 63.60x | 6.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 138.92x | 11.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 117.47x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.35x | 4.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.66x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.49x | 9.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $8 for CORT. CORT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INVA's 0.23x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.5% | +46.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +32.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$114M | -$282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $120M | $551M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $269M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 57.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CORT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CORT five years ago would be worth $24,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,549 for INVA. Over the past 12 months, INVA leads with a +20.4% total return vs CORT's -26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CORT at 30.0% vs INVA's 24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.5% | +13.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.3% | +20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.5% | +92.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.2% | +95.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +991.0% | +90.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.0% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CORT's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs CORT's 57.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.00 | $25.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.66 | $16.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.3% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.5 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 615K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CORT as "Buy" and INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.3% upside for INVA (target: $38) vs 37.4% for CORT (target: $72).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $71.67 | $37.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +0.2% |
INVA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CORT leads in 1 (Total Returns).
CORT vs INVA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CORT or INVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 8% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 8x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CORT or INVA?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 8x versus Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated at 63. 6x. On forward P/E, Innoviva, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CORT or INVA?
Over the past 5 years, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) delivered a total return of +140.
2%, compared to +95. 5% for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CORT returned +991. 0% versus INVA's +90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CORT or INVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated's 1. 78β — meaning CORT is approximately 1311% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for Innoviva, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CORT or INVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 12. 8% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CORT leads at 23. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CORT or INVA?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus 13. 1% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus 5. 9% for CORT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CORT leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CORT or INVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 138. 9x for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated — 127. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVA: 67. 3% to $37. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CORT or INVA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CORT or INVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13)). Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +90. 5%, CORT: +991. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CORT and INVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CORT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.