CPAC vs VMC

For growth investors, Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the stronger pick with 6.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC). Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Vulcan Materials Company at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. wins at 1. 00x versus Vulcan Materials Company's 2. 40x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) delivered a total return of +95. 2%, compared to +55. 3% for Vulcan Materials Company (VMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VMC returned +162. 5% versus CPAC's +89. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Vulcan Materials Company's 0. 80β — meaning VMC is approximately 530% more volatile than CPAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 124% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is pulling ahead at 6.

9% versus 1. 4% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vulcan Materials Company grew EPS 18. 5% year-over-year, compared to 17. 9% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VMC leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

6% net margin versus 10. 1% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VMC leads at 20. 1% versus 19. 8% for CPAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPAC leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus Vulcan Materials Company's 2. 40x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Vulcan Materials Company — 23. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPAC: 20. 1% to $12. 80.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 0. 7% for Vulcan Materials Company (VMC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPAC: +89. 0%, VMC: +162. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CPAC is a small-cap deep-value stock; VMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.