CPHI
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CPHI vs CHNR vs CNET vs SGBX vs SIGA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
Waste Management
Market Cap$42M
5Y Perf.-86.7%
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-96.1%
SGBX
Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Market Cap$33K
5Y Perf.-99.9%
SIGA
SIGA Technologies, Inc.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$339M
5Y Perf.-21.0%
CPHI vs CHNR vs CNET vs SGBX vs SIGA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CPHI | CHNR | CNET | SGBX | SIGA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Waste Management | Advertising Agencies | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $9M | $42M | $2M | $33K | $339M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 | $6M | $3M | $94M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-14M | $-2M | $-19M | $-4.04T |
| Gross Margin | -8.4% | — | 4.8% | -87.3% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | -79.8% | — | -31.7% | -375.8% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 2.8x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $0.00 | $122K | $7M | $595K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $627K | $3M | $812K | $376K | $155M |
CPHI vs CHNR vs CNET vs SGBX vs SIGA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CPHI
CHNR
CNET
SGBX
SIGA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Pharma Holdin… (CPHI) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| Safe & Green Holdin… (SGBX) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| SIGA Technologies, … (SIGA) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPHI vs CHNR vs CNET vs SGBX vs SIGA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CHNR and SGBX are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. SIGA also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CPHI
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick
CPHI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: healthcare exposure
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
The Quality Compounder
CHNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and efficiency.
- 0.0% margin vs SIGA's -43K%
- -5.3% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC -0.0% vs -625.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
The Communication Services Pick
Among these 5 stocks, CNET doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: communication services exposure
SGBX
Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
The Income Pick
SGBX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 100.0%
- Beta 0.45, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.08x
- Beta 0.45 vs CPHI's 1.18
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SIGA's 12.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
SIGA
SIGA Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play
SIGA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -31.8%, EPS growth -60.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.1%
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs CHNR's -93.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 11.83x
- -31.8% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SIGA | -31.8% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | CHNR | 0.0% margin vs SIGA's -43K% |
| Stability / Safety | SGBX | Beta 0.45 vs CPHI's 1.18 |
| Dividends | SGBX | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SIGA's 12.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | SIGA | +1.5% vs SGBX's -96.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHNR | -5.3% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC -0.0% vs -625.7% |
CPHI vs CHNR vs CNET vs SGBX vs SIGA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FY 2024
FY 2025
CPHI vs CHNR vs CNET vs SGBX vs SIGA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSIGALAGGINGSGBX
Who Leads Where
SIGA leads in 3 of 6 categories
CPHI leads 0 • CHNR leads 0 • CNET leads 0 • SGBX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓SGBXSafe & Green Holdings…
0leads
CNETZW Data Action Techno…
0leads
CHNRChina Natural Resourc…
0leads
CPHIChina Pharma Holdings…
0leads
SIGASIGA Technologies, In…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CPHIvs CHNRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SIGA4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SIGA6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SIGA5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIGA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIGA and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $94M and $0 in trailing revenue. CNET is the more profitable business, keeping -33.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIGA's -43117.4%. On growth, SIGA holds the edge at -11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CPHIChina Pharma Hold… | CHNRChina Natural Res… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | SGBXSafe & Green Hold… | SIGASIGA Technologies… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 | $6M | $3M | $94M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$12M | -$2M | -$12M | $26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$14M | -$2M | -$19M | -$4.04T |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$129,606 | -$6M | -$2M | -$5M | $33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | — | +4.8% | -87.3% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.8% | — | -31.7% | -3.8% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -78.7% | — | -33.4% | -5.7% | -43117.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | — | -27.3% | -155.0% | +35.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.3% | — | -47.0% | -40.0% | -11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +91.3% | +95.7% | +88.9% | — |
SIGA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CHNR and CNET and SGBX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CPHIChina Pharma Hold… | CHNRChina Natural Res… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | SGBXSafe & Green Hold… | SIGASIGA Technologies… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $42M | $2M | $32,963 | $339M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $41M | $1M | $7M | $185M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.95x | -88.68x | -0.38x | -0.00x | 14.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 2.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 7.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | — | 0.12x | 0.01x | 3.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 3.21x | 0.38x | — | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 6.96x |
Evenly matched — CHNR and CNET and SGBX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SIGA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SIGA delivers a -10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-11 in annual profit, vs $-77 for SGBX. SIGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPHI's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNET scores 5/9 vs SGBX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CPHIChina Pharma Hold… | CHNRChina Natural Res… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | SGBXSafe & Green Hold… | SIGASIGA Technologies… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.6% | -15.7% | -60.3% | -77.2% | -10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.0% | -5.3% | -21.3% | -35.6% | -7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.2% | -0.0% | -64.7% | -625.7% | +33.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.0% | -0.0% | -73.5% | — | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | — | 0.03x | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$3M | -$690,000 | $7M | -$154M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $626,879 | $3M | $812,000 | $375,873 | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $0 | $122,000 | $7M | $595,169 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -28.22x | -263.29x | — | -13.81x | — |
SIGA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIGA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SIGA five years ago would be worth $10,136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SGBX. Over the past 12 months, SIGA leads with a +1.5% total return vs SGBX's -96.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SIGA at 6.9% vs SGBX's -87.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CPHIChina Pharma Hold… | CHNRChina Natural Res… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | SGBXSafe & Green Hold… | SIGASIGA Technologies… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.5% | +22.2% | -44.4% | -52.9% | -15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.9% | -2.3% | -55.1% | -96.3% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -79.7% | -89.0% | -99.8% | +22.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -92.8% | -97.9% | -100.0% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -93.5% | -97.8% | -100.0% | +764.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.5% | -41.2% | -52.1% | -87.5% | +6.9% |
SIGA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHNR and SGBX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGBX is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPHI's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs SGBX's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CPHIChina Pharma Hold… | CHNRChina Natural Res… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | SGBXSafe & Green Hold… | SIGASIGA Technologies… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 1.12x | 1.18x | 0.45x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $8.20 | $2.78 | $96.00 | $9.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $3.16 | $0.57 | $0.79 | $4.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.2% | +52.4% | +25.2% | +1.0% | +49.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.1 | 55.2 | 50.7 | 35.2 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 893K | 11K | 503K | 688K |
Evenly matched — CHNR and SGBX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SGBX and SIGA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SGBX offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs SIGA's 12.73%.
| Metric | CPHIChina Pharma Hold… | CHNRChina Natural Res… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | SGBXSafe & Green Hold… | SIGASIGA Technologies… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +100.0% | +12.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $13.85 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — SGBX and SIGA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SIGA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallSIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CPHI vs CHNR vs CNET vs SGBX vs SIGA: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPHI or CHNR or CNET or SGBX or SIGA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the stronger pick with -31. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (2. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CPHI or CHNR or CNET or SGBX or SIGA?
Over the past 5 years, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIGA returned +764. 0% versus SGBX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CPHI or CHNR or CNET or SGBX or SIGA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus China Pharma Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning CPHI is approximately 164% more volatile than SGBX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 46% for China Pharma Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CPHI or CHNR or CNET or SGBX or SIGA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is pulling ahead at -31. 8% versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Natural Resources, Inc. grew EPS 95. 9% year-over-year, compared to -124. 1% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SIGA leads at -5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CPHI or CHNR or CNET or SGBX or SIGA?
SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 6% net margin versus -341. 2% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 24. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIGA leads at 25. 1% versus -195. 0% for SGBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SIGA leads at 68. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CPHI or CHNR or CNET or SGBX or SIGA?
In this comparison, SGBX (100.
0% yield), SIGA (12. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CPHI, CHNR, CNET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CPHI or CHNR or CNET or SGBX or SIGA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGBX: -100. 0%, CPHI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CPHI and CHNR and CNET and SGBX and SIGA?
These companies operate in different sectors (CPHI (Healthcare) and CHNR (Industrials) and CNET (Communication Services) and SGBX (Industrials) and SIGA (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CPHI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHNR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SGBX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SIGA is a small-cap deep-value stock. SGBX, SIGA pay a dividend while CPHI, CHNR, CNET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.