Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SGBX vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
SGBX vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Construction |
| Market Cap | $33K | $8.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | -87.3% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | -375.8% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $376K | $182M |
SGBX vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe & Green Holdin… (SGBX) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 501.2 | +401.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGBX vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGBX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, current ratio 0.08x
- Beta 0.45, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.08x
BLDR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -7.4%, EPS growth -57.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.6%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs SGBX's -100.0%
- -7.4% revenue growth vs SGBX's -69.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.4% revenue growth vs SGBX's -69.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.0% margin vs SGBX's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs BLDR's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -25.3% vs SGBX's -96.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC 6.4% vs -625.7% |
SGBX vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SGBX vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 4381.0x SGBX's $3M. BLDR is the more profitable business, keeping 2.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGBX's -5.7%. On growth, BLDR holds the edge at -10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -87.3% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -155.0% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.9% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SGBX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32,963 | $8.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 20.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLDR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLDR delivers a 6.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-77 for SGBX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLDR scores 5/9 vs SGBX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -77.2% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.6% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -625.7% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $375,873 | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.81x | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLDR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLDR five years ago would be worth $15,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SGBX. Over the past 12 months, BLDR leads with a -25.3% total return vs SGBX's -96.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLDR at -11.0% vs SGBX's -87.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.9% | -23.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.4% | -25.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -29.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +53.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +636.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -87.5% | -11.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SGBX and BLDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGBX is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLDR currently trades 53.0% from its 52-week high vs SGBX's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.00 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.79 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.0% | +53.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.2 | 31.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 440K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
BLDR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
SGBX is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $109.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $13.85 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.7% |
BLDR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SGBX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SGBX vs BLDR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGBX or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the stronger pick with -7. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 6x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SGBX or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) delivered a total return of +53. 9%, compared to -99. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLDR returned +636. 9% versus SGBX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SGBX or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 271% more volatile than SGBX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SGBX or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is pulling ahead at -7. 4% versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe & Green Holdings Corp. grew EPS 69. 1% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLDR leads at -12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SGBX or BLDR?
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -341. 2% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLDR leads at 5. 2% versus -195. 0% for SGBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLDR leads at 29. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SGBX or BLDR?
In this comparison, SGBX (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. BLDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SGBX or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 100. 0% yield). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGBX: -100. 0%, BLDR: +636. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SGBX and BLDR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SGBX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SGBX pays a dividend while BLDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.