CPK vs RGCO

For growth investors, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is the stronger pick with 18.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 6% for RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO). RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, RGC Resources, Inc.

(RGCO) is the cheapest at 18. 3x versus Chesapeake Utilities Corporation at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, RGC Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Chesapeake Utilities Corporation wins at 2. 78x versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 12. 54x.

Over the past 5 years, RGC Resources, Inc.

(RGCO) delivered a total return of +28. 2%, compared to +15. 8% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPK returned +133. 1% versus RGCO's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning RGCO is approximately 1398% more volatile than CPK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 131% for RGC Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is pulling ahead at 18.

1% versus 12. 6% for RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chesapeake Utilities Corporation grew EPS 13. 5% year-over-year, compared to 11. 2% for RGC Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPK leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

1% net margin versus 13. 9% for RGC Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPK leads at 27. 7% versus 19. 4% for RGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RGCO leads at 34. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 78x versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 12. 54x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

04), 2. 0% yield, +133. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPK: +133. 1%, RGCO: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CPK is a small-cap high-growth stock; RGCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.