Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RGCO vs MSEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
RGCO vs MSEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $246M | $955M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $107M | $199M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 18.1x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $149M | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $3M |
RGCO vs MSEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RGCO vs MSEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RGCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 11.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- 108.5% 10Y total return vs MSEX's 62.9%
MSEX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and stability.
- 22.1% margin vs RGCO's 13.0%
- Lower D/E ratio (84.9% vs 131.2%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.6% revenue growth vs MSEX's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 20.1x), PEG 12.54 vs 12.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs RGCO's 13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (84.9% vs 131.2%) | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs MSEX's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.3% vs MSEX's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs MSEX's 3.2%, ROIC 5.4% vs 4.7% |
RGCO vs MSEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RGCO vs MSEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RGCO and MSEX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSEX is the larger business by revenue, generating $199M annually — 1.9x RGCO's $107M. MSEX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RGCO's 13.0%. On growth, RGCO holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $107M | $199M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $30M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.6% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | -9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.7% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RGCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, RGCO trades at a 16% valuation discount to MSEX's 21.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RGCO offers better value at 12.54x vs MSEX's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $246M | $955M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $392M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.33x | 21.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.05x | 20.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 12.54x | 13.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.12x | 15.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.58x | 4.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.15x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.91x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RGCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RGCO delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for MSEX. MSEX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RGCO's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RGCO scores 7/9 vs MSEX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $147M | $416M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $149M | $419M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.65x | 4.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RGCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RGCO five years ago would be worth $12,815 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,158 for MSEX. Over the past 12 months, RGCO leads with a +16.3% total return vs MSEX's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RGCO at 11.7% vs MSEX's -9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.5% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.3% | -12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.4% | -25.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.2% | -28.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.5% | +62.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.7% | -9.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RGCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RGCO's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RGCO currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs MSEX's 82.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | -0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.50 | $62.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.68 | $44.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +82.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 160K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RGCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RGCO as "Buy" and MSEX as "Buy". For income investors, RGCO offers the higher dividend yield at 3.47% vs MSEX's 2.67%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $53.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $1.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RGCO leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
RGCO vs MSEX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RGCO or MSEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RGC Resources, Inc.
(RGCO) is the stronger pick with 12. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RGCO or MSEX?
On trailing P/E, RGC Resources, Inc.
(RGCO) is the cheapest at 18. 3x versus Middlesex Water Company at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, RGC Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RGC Resources, Inc. wins at 12. 54x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RGCO or MSEX?
Over the past 5 years, RGC Resources, Inc.
(RGCO) delivered a total return of +28. 2%, compared to -28. 4% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RGCO returned +108. 5% versus MSEX's +62. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RGCO or MSEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning RGCO is approximately -620% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 131% for RGC Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RGCO or MSEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RGC Resources, Inc.
(RGCO) is pulling ahead at 12. 6% versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RGC Resources, Inc. grew EPS 11. 2% year-over-year, compared to -4. 5% for Middlesex Water Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSEX leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RGCO or MSEX?
Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 13. 9% for RGC Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSEX leads at 27. 9% versus 19. 4% for RGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSEX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RGCO or MSEX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 12. 54x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Middlesex Water Company — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RGCO or MSEX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 7% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX).
09Is RGCO or MSEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +62. 9%, RGCO: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RGCO and MSEX?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RGCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.