Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CPOP vs MOMO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
CPOP vs MOMO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $901K | $2.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $10.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $800M |
| Gross Margin | 3.4% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | -26.5% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.1x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $129M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $231K | $5.44B |
CPOP vs MOMO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pop Culture Group C… (CPOP) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPOP vs MOMO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 155.5%, EPS growth -327.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
- 155.5% revenue growth vs MOMO's -5.9%
MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 4.6%
- -9.4% 10Y total return vs CPOP's -99.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 155.5% revenue growth vs MOMO's -5.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs CPOP's -30.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs CPOP's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.2% vs CPOP's -42.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs CPOP's -30.0%, ROIC 10.9% vs -40.9% |
CPOP vs MOMO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPOP vs MOMO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.3B annually — 106.6x CPOP's $96M. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPOP's -30.6%. On growth, CPOP holds the edge at +74.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $10.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | $800M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $685M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.5% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.6% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +6.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +74.2% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +121.6% | +32.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CPOP leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $901,212 | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.07x | 9.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-102 for CPOP. MOMO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPOP's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOMO scores 7/9 vs CPOP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -102.2% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.0% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.9% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.3% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $230,563 | $5.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $129M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -77.74x | 18.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOMO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $6,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10 for CPOP. Over the past 12 months, MOMO leads with a +16.2% total return vs CPOP's -42.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOMO at -1.9% vs CPOP's -64.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.4% | +1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.5% | +16.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.5% | -5.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -36.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -9.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -64.3% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MOMO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPOP's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs CPOP's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.61 | $9.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $5.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.0% | +68.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 648K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
MOMO is the only dividend payer here at 4.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.1% |
MOMO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CPOP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CPOP vs MOMO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPOP or MOMO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pop Culture Group Co.
, Ltd (CPOP) is the stronger pick with 155. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO). Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CPOP or MOMO?
Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) delivered a total return of -36. 7%, compared to -99. 9% for Pop Culture Group Co. , Ltd (CPOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOMO returned -9. 4% versus CPOP's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CPOP or MOMO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Pop Culture Group Co. , Ltd's 1. 05β — meaning CPOP is approximately 34% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 41% for Pop Culture Group Co. , Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CPOP or MOMO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pop Culture Group Co.
, Ltd (CPOP) is pulling ahead at 155. 5% versus -5. 9% for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hello Group Inc. grew EPS -17. 2% year-over-year, compared to -327. 7% for Pop Culture Group Co. , Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPOP leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CPOP or MOMO?
Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -26. 2% for Pop Culture Group Co. , Ltd — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus -28. 8% for CPOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOMO leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CPOP or MOMO?
In this comparison, MOMO (4.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CPOP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CPOP or MOMO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9. 4%, CPOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CPOP and MOMO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPOP is a small-cap high-growth stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock. MOMO pays a dividend while CPOP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.