Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CPRT vs LQDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
CPRT vs LQDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $32.77B | $1.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.61B | $480M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.56B | $30M |
| Gross Margin | 45.3% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 36.5% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $104M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.78B | $175M |
CPRT vs LQDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copart, Inc. (CPRT) | 100 | 151.5 | +51.5% |
| Liquidity Services,… (LQDT) | 100 | 634.9 | +534.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPRT vs LQDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.52
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs LQDT's 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 8.25x
LQDT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.2%, EPS growth 38.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.4%
- 31.2% revenue growth vs CPRT's 9.7%
- +15.0% vs CPRT's -44.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.2% revenue growth vs CPRT's 9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.5x vs 24.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.8% margin vs LQDT's 6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs LQDT's 0.76, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.0% vs CPRT's -44.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs LQDT's 8.0%, ROIC 20.1% vs 60.8% |
CPRT vs LQDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPRT vs LQDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 9.6x LQDT's $480M. CPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LQDT's 6.3%. On growth, LQDT holds the edge at +3.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $480M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.6B | $30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $78M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.3% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.3x trailing earnings, CPRT trades at a 49% valuation discount to LQDT's 41.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CPRT's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LQDT's 21.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32.8B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.1B | $964M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.30x | 41.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.49x | 24.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.73x | 21.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.05x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.60x | 5.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.62x | 19.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRT delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $14 for LQDT. CPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LQDT's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LQDT scores 7/9 vs CPRT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.7% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.1% | +60.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.7% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.7B | -$160M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $175M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LQDT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LQDT five years ago would be worth $14,784 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,876 for CPRT. Over the past 12 months, LQDT leads with a +15.0% total return vs CPRT's -44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LQDT at 37.0% vs CPRT's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.3% | +22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.7% | +15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.7% | +157.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.8% | +47.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +527.2% | +508.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.2% | +37.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPRT and LQDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LQDT's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LQDT currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs CPRT's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.85 | $38.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.20 | $21.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.0% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 81.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.8M | 159K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CPRT as "Buy" and LQDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.4% upside for LQDT (target: $44) vs 19.6% for CPRT (target: $41).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.50 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
CPRT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LQDT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CPRT vs LQDT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPRT or LQDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is the stronger pick with 31. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for Copart, Inc. (CPRT). Copart, Inc. (CPRT) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Copart, Inc. (CPRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPRT or LQDT?
On trailing P/E, Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus Liquidity Services, Inc. at 41. 7x. On forward P/E, Copart, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPRT or LQDT?
Over the past 5 years, Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) delivered a total return of +47. 8%, compared to +8. 8% for Copart, Inc. (CPRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRT returned +527. 2% versus LQDT's +508. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPRT or LQDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Liquidity Services, Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning LQDT is approximately 46% more volatile than CPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 7% for Liquidity Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPRT or LQDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is pulling ahead at 31. 2% versus 9. 7% for Copart, Inc. (CPRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Liquidity Services, Inc. grew EPS 38. 1% year-over-year, compared to 13. 6% for Copart, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LQDT leads at 19. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPRT or LQDT?
Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus 5. 9% for Liquidity Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus 7. 4% for LQDT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPRT or LQDT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Liquidity Services, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LQDT: 21. 4% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPRT or LQDT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CPRT or LQDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), +527. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPRT: +527. 2%, LQDT: +508. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPRT and LQDT?
These companies operate in different sectors (CPRT (Industrials) and LQDT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CPRT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LQDT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.