Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CPS vs MFIN vs ENVA vs SMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Auto - Parts
CPS vs MFIN vs ENVA vs SMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $547M | $227M | $4.36B | $895M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $688.43B | $353M | $3.15B | $1.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33.31B | $47M | $327M | $46M |
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | 96.7% | 50.1% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 50.5% | 23.5% | 10.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 8.7x | 10.6x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.26B | $316M | $4.56B | $682M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $198M | $202M | $72M | $72M |
CPS vs MFIN vs ENVA vs SMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper-Standard Hol… (CPS) | 100 | 293.6 | +193.6% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 414.6 | +314.6% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 1236.0 | +1136.0% |
| Standard Motor Prod… (SMP) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPS vs MFIN vs ENVA vs SMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 62.3%, current ratio 27.10x
- Beta 1.14, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.2x)
ENVA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 20.6% 10Y total return vs MFIN's 61.7%
- +84.1% vs MFIN's +10.2%
- 5.2% ROA vs CPS's -7.2%, ROIC 10.4% vs 8.6%
SMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth -23.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- 22.4% revenue growth vs CPS's 0.4%
- Beta 0.84 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs CPS's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CPS's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SMP's 3.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.1% vs MFIN's +10.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs CPS's -7.2%, ROIC 10.4% vs 8.6% |
CPS vs MFIN vs ENVA vs SMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CPS vs MFIN vs ENVA vs SMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ENVA leads 1 • CPS leads 0 • SMP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $688.4B annually — 1948.5x MFIN's $353M. MFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPS's -4.8%. On growth, CPS holds the edge at +1027.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $688.4B | $353M | $3.2B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $210M | $111M | $815M | $229M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33.3B | $47M | $327M | $46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$93.1B | $126M | $1.9B | $39M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +96.7% | +50.1% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +50.5% | +23.5% | +10.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +12.2% | +9.8% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | +35.7% | +56.2% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1027.9% | — | — | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.4% | +16.3% | +28.6% | +33.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 75% valuation discount to SMP's 22.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFIN's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ENVA's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $547M | $227M | $4.4B | $895M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $342M | $8.9B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -133.91x | 5.43x | 15.10x | 21.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.25x | 8.66x | 10.64x | 9.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.87x | 1.92x | 11.33x | 6.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.64x | 1.38x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.46x | 3.45x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.65x | 1.80x | 2.46x | 47.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $7 for SMP. MFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.62x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENVA's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFIN scores 7/9 vs CPS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.4% | +24.9% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.2% | +1.6% | +5.2% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +17.2% | +10.4% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +10.0% | +13.5% | +12.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.62x | 3.41x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $115M | $4.5B | $610M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $198M | $202M | $72M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $316M | $4.6B | $682M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 1.07x | 79.01x | 5.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $47,424 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,821 for SMP. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +84.1% total return vs MFIN's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.7% vs SMP's 6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | -3.9% | +8.0% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.9% | +10.2% | +84.1% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.8% | +60.4% | +307.6% | +19.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.5% | +24.8% | +374.2% | -1.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.4% | +61.7% | +2064.6% | +32.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.9% | +17.1% | +59.7% | +6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ENVA and SMP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMP is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVA's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs CPS's 64.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.14x | 1.48x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.77 | $11.00 | $176.68 | $46.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.32 | $7.88 | $89.00 | $28.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.5% | +87.8% | +99.0% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 58.2 | 65.3 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 201K | 59K | 224K | 115K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MFIN and SMP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CPS as "Hold", MFIN as "Hold", ENVA as "Buy", SMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.6% upside for CPS (target: $55) vs 14.1% for ENVA (target: $200). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.68% vs SMP's 3.00%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | — | $199.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 9 | 10 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.7% | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.45 | — | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +4.9% | 0.0% |
MFIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ENVA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CPS vs MFIN vs ENVA vs SMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPS or MFIN or ENVA or SMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPS or MFIN or ENVA or SMP?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Standard Motor Products, Inc. at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPS or MFIN or ENVA or SMP?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +374. 2%, compared to -1. 8% for Standard Motor Products, Inc. (SMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 6% versus CPS's -63. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPS or MFIN or ENVA or SMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Enova International, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ENVA is approximately 75% more volatile than SMP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 62% versus 3% for Enova International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPS or MFIN or ENVA or SMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus 0. 4% for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. grew EPS 94. 9% year-over-year, compared to -23. 7% for Standard Motor Products, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMP leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPS or MFIN or ENVA or SMP?
Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus -0. 2% for Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 3. 9% for CPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPS or MFIN or ENVA or SMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 6x for Enova International, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPS: 78. 6% to $55. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPS or MFIN or ENVA or SMP?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield), SMP (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CPS, ENVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CPS or MFIN or ENVA or SMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMP: +32. 7%, ENVA: +20. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPS and MFIN and ENVA and SMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (CPS (Consumer Cyclical) and MFIN (Financial Services) and ENVA (Financial Services) and SMP (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMP is a small-cap high-growth stock. MFIN, SMP pay a dividend while CPS, ENVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.