Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CPSH vs GNSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
CPSH vs GNSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $57M | $90M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30K | $-15M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | -22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 137.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $336K | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $8M |
CPSH vs GNSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPS Technologies Co… (CPSH) | 100 | 264.1 | +164.1% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPSH vs GNSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPSH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 54.3%, EPS growth 112.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.0%
- 108.3% 10Y total return vs GNSS's 14.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 5.30x
GNSS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 0.72x
- 69.8% revenue growth vs CPSH's 54.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.8% revenue growth vs CPSH's 54.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs GNSS's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs CPSH's 1.06 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +118.0% vs GNSS's +2.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 2.1% vs -56.7% |
CPSH vs GNSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CPSH vs GNSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNSS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNSS is the larger business by revenue, generating $51M annually — 1.6x CPSH's $32M. CPSH is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $85,428 | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30,213 | -$15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$767M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | -22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -29.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | -5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | +145.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +78.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CPSH leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $90M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | $104M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 137.36x | -5.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 119.84x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.76x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.23x | 41.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPSH leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPSH delivers a 0.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. CPSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPSH scores 6/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | -8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | -22.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | -56.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | -68.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 9.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $336,000 | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -31.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CPSH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPSH five years ago would be worth $5,725 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,328 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, CPSH leads with a +118.0% total return vs GNSS's +2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CPSH at 10.5% vs GNSS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.2% | -8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +118.0% | +2.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.9% | -31.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.7% | -66.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.3% | +14.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.5% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GNSS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPSH's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNSS currently trades 74.1% from its 52-week high vs CPSH's 54.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.85 | $2.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.63 | $1.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.7% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.8 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 259K | 95K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CPSH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GNSS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility).
CPSH vs GNSS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPSH or GNSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 54. 3% for CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH). CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH) offers the better valuation at 137. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CPSH or GNSS?
Over the past 5 years, CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH) delivered a total return of -42.
7%, compared to -66. 7% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPSH returned +108. 3% versus GNSS's +14. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CPSH or GNSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus CPS Technologies Corporation's 1. 06β — meaning CPSH is approximately 22% more volatile than GNSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CPSH or GNSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus 54. 3% for CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CPS Technologies Corporation grew EPS 112. 4% year-over-year, compared to 44. 4% for Genasys Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPSH leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CPSH or GNSS?
CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
3% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPSH leads at 1. 4% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNSS leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CPSH or GNSS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CPSH or GNSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNSS: +14. 9%, CPSH: +108. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CPSH and GNSS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.