Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CR vs GNSS vs IEX vs SPOK vs ROP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Machinery
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Industrial - Machinery
CR vs GNSS vs IEX vs SPOK vs ROP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $10.47B | $93M | $16.13B | $226M | $35.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.44B | $51M | $3.53B | $103M | $8.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $327M | $-15M | $508M | $11M | $1.71B |
| Gross Margin | 41.6% | 43.2% | 44.4% | 91.4% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | -22.1% | 20.8% | 13.2% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 26.7x | — | 25.6x | 16.5x | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.22B | $21M | $1.82B | $7M | $9.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.73B | $8M | $580M | $25M | $297M |
CR vs GNSS vs IEX vs SPOK vs ROP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crane Company (CR) | 100 | 325.4 | +225.4% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
| IDEX Corporation (IEX) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| Roper Technologies,… (ROP) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CR vs GNSS vs IEX vs SPOK vs ROP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 261.2% 10Y total return vs IEX's 191.9%
- 10.1% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 19.9% vs -56.7%
GNSS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
- 69.8% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5%
IEX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +19.0% vs ROP's -39.7%
SPOK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.40, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs IEX's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ROP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.63 vs IEX's 4.79
- Lower P/E (15.7x vs 25.6x), PEG 1.63 vs 4.79
- 21.1% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
- Beta 0.39 vs CR's 1.37, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.8% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 25.6x), PEG 1.63 vs 4.79 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.1% margin vs GNSS's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs CR's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs IEX's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.0% vs ROP's -39.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.1% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 19.9% vs -56.7% |
CR vs GNSS vs IEX vs SPOK vs ROP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CR vs GNSS vs IEX vs SPOK vs ROP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CR leads in 2 of 6 categories
ROP leads 1 • SPOK leads 1 • GNSS leads 0 • IEX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 159.5x GNSS's $51M. ROP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $51M | $3.5B | $103M | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $489M | -$9M | $945M | $17M | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $327M | -$15M | $508M | $11M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $262M | -$3M | $611M | $26M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.6% | +43.2% | +44.4% | +91.4% | +69.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | -22.1% | +20.8% | +13.2% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | -29.2% | +14.4% | +10.3% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | -5.3% | +17.3% | +24.7% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.9% | +145.9% | +8.9% | -100.0% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -39.0% | +78.0% | +27.8% | -64.0% | +59.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SPOK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SPOK trades at a 57% valuation discount to IEX's 33.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CR offers better value at 1.90x vs IEX's 6.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.5B | $93M | $16.1B | $226M | $35.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.0B | $107M | $17.4B | $207M | $44.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.96x | -5.15x | 33.84x | 14.52x | 24.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.71x | — | 25.61x | 16.50x | 15.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.90x | — | 6.33x | — | 2.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.99x | — | 18.75x | 8.96x | 14.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.54x | 2.29x | 4.66x | 1.62x | 4.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.15x | 42.83x | 4.06x | 1.57x | 1.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.68x | — | 26.15x | 8.96x | 14.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CR delivers a 16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. SPOK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IEX scores 7/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.3% | -8.2% | +12.6% | +7.3% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.1% | -22.0% | +7.3% | +5.2% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.9% | -56.7% | +10.4% | +11.3% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.5% | -68.2% | +11.6% | +12.1% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 9.85x | 0.45x | 0.05x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$514M | $13M | $1.2B | -$18M | $9.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $8M | $580M | $25M | $297M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $21M | $1.8B | $7M | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.68x | -31.66x | 11.33x | — | 6.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CR five years ago would be worth $19,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,672 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, IEX leads with a +19.0% total return vs ROP's -39.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CR at 34.9% vs GNSS's -10.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.2% | -5.5% | +21.5% | -13.8% | -20.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.4% | 0.0% | +19.0% | -26.6% | -39.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.4% | -29.2% | +6.9% | +13.8% | -23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.2% | -63.3% | +1.2% | +61.7% | -19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +261.2% | +18.3% | +191.9% | +13.6% | +109.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.9% | -10.9% | +2.2% | +4.4% | -8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IEX and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROP is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CR's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IEX currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs SPOK's 56.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 0.85x | 0.93x | 0.40x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $214.31 | $2.70 | $223.84 | $19.31 | $584.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $159.58 | $1.40 | $157.25 | $9.96 | $313.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.6% | +76.3% | +96.9% | +56.4% | +58.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 60.8 | 61.5 | 42.5 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 481K | 96K | 714K | 170K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IEX and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CR as "Buy", IEX as "Hold", SPOK as "Hold", ROP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.7% upside for SPOK (target: $15) vs 12.3% for IEX (target: $244). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.88% vs CR's 0.50%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $222.67 | — | $243.57 | $15.00 | $457.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | — | 29 | 1 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — | +1.3% | +11.9% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 23 | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | — | $2.82 | $1.29 | $3.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +1.3% | +1.4% |
CR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ROP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CR vs GNSS vs IEX vs SPOK vs ROP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CR or GNSS or IEX or SPOK or ROP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crane Company (CR) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CR or GNSS or IEX or SPOK or ROP?
On trailing P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus IDEX Corporation at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, Roper Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Roper Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 63x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 79x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CR or GNSS or IEX or SPOK or ROP?
Over the past 5 years, Crane Company (CR) delivered a total return of +90.
2%, compared to -63. 3% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CR returned +261. 2% versus SPOK's +13. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CR or GNSS or IEX or SPOK or ROP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Crane Company's 1. 37β — meaning CR is approximately 248% more volatile than ROP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CR or GNSS or IEX or SPOK or ROP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genasys Inc. grew EPS 44. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 5% for IDEX Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROP leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CR or GNSS or IEX or SPOK or ROP?
Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROP leads at 28. 3% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CR or GNSS or IEX or SPOK or ROP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 63x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 79x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 26. 7x for Crane Company — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPOK: 37. 7% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CR or GNSS or IEX or SPOK or ROP?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), IEX (1. 3% yield), ROP (1. 0% yield), CR (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. GNSS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CR or GNSS or IEX or SPOK or ROP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 0% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROP: +109. 8%, CR: +261. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CR and GNSS and IEX and SPOK and ROP?
These companies operate in different sectors (CR (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology) and IEX (Industrials) and SPOK (Healthcare) and ROP (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; IEX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; ROP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. IEX, SPOK, ROP pay a dividend while CR, GNSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.