Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CR vs IEX vs FLS vs GNSS vs PNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Machinery
CR vs IEX vs FLS vs GNSS vs PNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $10.49B | $15.97B | $9.14B | $90M | $12.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.44B | $3.53B | $4.65B | $51M | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $327M | $508M | $354M | $-15M | $671M |
| Gross Margin | 41.6% | 44.4% | 35.5% | 43.2% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 20.8% | 12.6% | -22.1% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 26.9x | 25.5x | 17.5x | — | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.22B | $1.82B | $1.91B | $21M | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.73B | $580M | $760M | $8M | $102M |
CR vs IEX vs FLS vs GNSS vs PNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crane Company (CR) | 100 | 326.2 | +226.2% |
| IDEX Corporation (IEX) | 100 | 134.8 | +34.8% |
| Flowserve Corporati… (FLS) | 100 | 274.1 | +174.1% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 201.8 | +101.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CR vs IEX vs FLS vs GNSS vs PNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 261.9% 10Y total return vs IEX's 189.3%
- 10.1% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 19.9% vs -56.7%
IEX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 45.2%, current ratio 2.86x
- Beta 0.95, yield 1.3%, current ratio 2.86x
- 1.3% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs CR's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FLS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.82 vs IEX's 4.77
- +55.0% vs PNR's -12.8%
GNSS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
- 69.8% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
- Beta 0.87 vs FLS's 1.69
PNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 16.0% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.8% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs GNSS's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs FLS's 1.69 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs CR's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.0% vs PNR's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.1% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 19.9% vs -56.7% |
CR vs IEX vs FLS vs GNSS vs PNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CR vs IEX vs FLS vs GNSS vs PNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IEX leads in 2 of 6 categories
CR leads 2 • FLS leads 0 • GNSS leads 0 • PNR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 91.4x GNSS's $51M. PNR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $3.5B | $4.7B | $51M | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $489M | $945M | $683M | -$9M | $983M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $327M | $508M | $354M | -$15M | $671M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $262M | $611M | $437M | -$3M | $716M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.6% | +44.4% | +35.5% | +43.2% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +20.8% | +12.6% | -22.1% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +14.4% | +7.6% | -29.2% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +17.3% | +9.4% | -5.3% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.9% | +8.9% | -6.7% | +145.9% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -39.0% | +27.8% | +14.3% | +78.0% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLS and PNR each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 40% valuation discount to IEX's 33.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FLS offers better value at 1.26x vs IEX's 6.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.5B | $16.0B | $9.1B | $90M | $12.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.0B | $17.2B | $10.3B | $104M | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.03x | 33.51x | 27.10x | -5.00x | 19.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.85x | 25.52x | 17.47x | — | 14.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.91x | 6.27x | 1.26x | — | 1.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.04x | 18.58x | 14.51x | — | 14.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.55x | 4.62x | 1.93x | 2.22x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.16x | 4.02x | 4.16x | 41.58x | 3.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.75x | 25.89x | 21.02x | — | 17.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. PNR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.3% | +12.6% | +15.5% | -8.2% | +17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.1% | +7.3% | +6.2% | -22.0% | +9.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.9% | +10.4% | +14.2% | -56.7% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.5% | +11.6% | +14.9% | -68.2% | +15.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.45x | 0.85x | 9.85x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$514M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $13M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $580M | $760M | $8M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $21M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.68x | 11.33x | 7.45x | -31.66x | 11.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CR five years ago would be worth $18,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,328 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, FLS leads with a +55.0% total return vs PNR's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CR at 35.0% vs GNSS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.9% | +20.4% | +1.4% | -8.3% | -24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.1% | +20.9% | +55.0% | +2.6% | -12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.0% | +5.9% | +106.2% | -31.3% | +39.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.4% | +0.7% | +77.4% | -66.7% | +23.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +261.9% | +189.3% | +75.6% | +14.9% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.0% | +1.9% | +27.3% | -11.8% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IEX and GNSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLS's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IEX currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.95x | 1.69x | 0.87x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $214.31 | $223.84 | $92.41 | $2.70 | $113.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $159.58 | $157.25 | $45.11 | $1.40 | $77.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.8% | +96.0% | +77.4% | +74.1% | +69.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 67.6 | 41.8 | 59.9 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 467K | 713K | 2.1M | 95K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CR as "Buy", IEX as "Hold", FLS as "Hold", PNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 12.7% for IEX (target: $242). For income investors, IEX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.31% vs CR's 0.50%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $222.67 | $242.14 | $89.57 | — | $113.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 29 | 31 | — | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +1.3% | +1.2% | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | $2.82 | $0.84 | — | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | +2.8% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
IEX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). CR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
CR vs IEX vs FLS vs GNSS vs PNR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CR or IEX or FLS or GNSS or PNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crane Company (CR) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CR or IEX or FLS or GNSS or PNR?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
9x versus IDEX Corporation at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Flowserve Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CR or IEX or FLS or GNSS or PNR?
Over the past 5 years, Crane Company (CR) delivered a total return of +89.
4%, compared to -66. 7% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CR returned +261. 9% versus GNSS's +14. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CR or IEX or FLS or GNSS or PNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Flowserve Corporation's 1. 69β — meaning FLS is approximately 94% more volatile than GNSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pentair plc (PNR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CR or IEX or FLS or GNSS or PNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genasys Inc. grew EPS 44. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 5% for IDEX Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLS leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CR or IEX or FLS or GNSS or PNR?
Crane Company (CR) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IEX leads at 20. 8% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IEX leads at 44. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CR or IEX or FLS or GNSS or PNR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 9x for Crane Company — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 43. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — CR or IEX or FLS or GNSS or PNR?
In this comparison, IEX (1.
3% yield), PNR (1. 3% yield), FLS (1. 2% yield), CR (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. GNSS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CR or IEX or FLS or GNSS or PNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IDEX Corporation (IEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
95), 1. 3% yield, +189. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IEX: +189. 3%, CR: +261. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CR and IEX and FLS and GNSS and PNR?
These companies operate in different sectors (CR (Industrials) and IEX (Industrials) and FLS (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology) and PNR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IEX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; PNR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. IEX, FLS, PNR pay a dividend while CR, GNSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.