Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRBG vs BLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
CRBG vs BLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $12.47B | $168.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.89B | $20.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $245M | $6.10B |
| Gross Margin | 80.9% | 49.4% |
| Operating Margin | -18.7% | 37.1% |
| Forward P/E | 5.6x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $10.91B | $14.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $447M | $12.76B |
CRBG vs BLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corebridge Financia… (CRBG) | 100 | 138.7 | +38.7% |
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 197.1 | +97.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRBG vs BLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRBG is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 0.6% vs BLK's 0.2%
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 20.4x)
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BLK's 1.9%
BLK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.29, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 15.1%
- 250.5% 10Y total return vs CRBG's 57.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% NII/revenue growth vs CRBG's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CRBG's 1.0% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs CRBG's 1.49, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BLK's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.1% vs CRBG's -9.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CRBG's 1.0% |
CRBG vs BLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRBG vs BLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRBG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.4B annually — 7.1x CRBG's $2.9B. BLK is the more profitable business, keeping 31.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRBG's -12.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $20.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $8.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $245M | $6.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.9% | +49.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.7% | +37.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | +31.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +70.0% | +23.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.8% | -22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CRBG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BLK's 20.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRBG's 1528.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.5B | $168.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.9B | $169.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.16x | 25.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.56x | 20.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1528.81x | 20.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.32x | 8.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 3.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.17x | 35.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLK leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLK delivers a 9.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $2 for CRBG. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRBG's 0.78x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | +9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.6% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.5B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $447M | $12.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.9B | $14.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | 9.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CRBG and BLK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRBG five years ago would be worth $15,726 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,805 for BLK. Over the past 12 months, BLK leads with a +19.1% total return vs CRBG's -9.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRBG at 24.0% vs BLK's 21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.3% | +0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.6% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.7% | +78.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.3% | +38.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.3% | +250.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.0% | +21.3% |
Risk & Volatility
BLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BLK is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRBG's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLK currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs CRBG's 74.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.57 | $1219.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.19 | $917.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.7% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 782K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CRBG and BLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRBG as "Buy" and BLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.6% upside for CRBG (target: $33) vs 20.9% for BLK (target: $1312). For income investors, CRBG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.47% vs BLK's 1.89%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.20 | $1311.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.95 | $20.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +17.0% | +1.1% |
CRBG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BLK leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
CRBG vs BLK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRBG or BLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Corebridge Financial, Inc. (CRBG). BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Corebridge Financial, Inc. (CRBG) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRBG or BLK?
On forward P/E, Corebridge Financial, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRBG or BLK?
Over the past 5 years, Corebridge Financial, Inc.
(CRBG) delivered a total return of +57. 3%, compared to +38. 0% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLK returned +250. 5% versus CRBG's +57. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRBG or BLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Corebridge Financial, Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning CRBG is approximately 15% more volatile than BLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 78% for Corebridge Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRBG or BLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus 7. 9% for Corebridge Financial, Inc. (CRBG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BlackRock, Inc. grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -118. 3% for Corebridge Financial, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRBG or BLK?
BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 2% net margin versus -12. 7% for Corebridge Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLK leads at 37. 1% versus -18. 7% for CRBG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRBG leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRBG or BLK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Corebridge Financial, Inc.
(CRBG) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for BlackRock, Inc. — 14. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRBG: 21. 6% to $33. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRBG or BLK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Corebridge Financial, Inc. (CRBG) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 9% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK).
09Is CRBG or BLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29), 1. 9% yield, +250. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLK: +250. 5%, CRBG: +57. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRBG and BLK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRBG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.