Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CRDF logo
CRDF
TGTX logo
TGTX
MGNX logo
MGNX
IMVT logo
IMVT
IQV logo
IQV
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRDF vs TGTX vs MGNX vs IMVT vs IQV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRDF
Cardiff Oncology, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$109M
5Y Perf.-69.3%
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.36B
5Y Perf.+154.2%
MGNX
MacroGenics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$255M
5Y Perf.-85.8%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.75B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.73B
5Y Perf.+27.9%

CRDF vs TGTX vs MGNX vs IMVT vs IQV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRDF logoCRDF
TGTX logoTGTX
MGNX logoMGNX
IMVT logoIMVT
IQV logoIQV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$109M$7.36B$255M$6.75B$30.73B
Revenue (TTM)$525K$700M$157M$0.00$16.63B
Net Income (TTM)$-45M$462M$-70M$-506M$1.39B
Gross Margin-21.5%83.0%69.9%26.1%
Operating Margin-90.3%21.3%-40.5%13.9%
Forward P/E35.9x14.2x
Total Debt$832K$261M$107M$72K$16.17B
Cash & Equiv.$17M$79M$57M$902M$1.98B

CRDF vs TGTX vs MGNX vs IMVT vs IQVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRDF
TGTX
MGNX
IMVT
IQV
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Cardiff Oncology, I… (CRDF)10030.7-69.3%
TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX)100254.2+154.2%
MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX)10014.2-85.8%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100138.1+38.1%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)100127.9+27.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRDF vs TGTX vs MGNX vs IMVT vs IQV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TGTX leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MacroGenics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. IQV also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇TGTX emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CRDF
Cardiff Oncology, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

CRDF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 230.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 40.2%, current ratio 4.10x
  • Beta 0.74, current ratio 4.10x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MGNX
MacroGenics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

MGNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +134.5% vs CRDF's -58.9%
Best for: momentum
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

IQV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.22
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTGTX logoTGTX87.3% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
ValueIQV logoIQVBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsTGTX logoTGTX66.0% margin vs CRDF's -85.3%
Stability / SafetyTGTX logoTGTXBeta 0.74 vs CRDF's 2.30
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MGNX logoMGNX+134.5% vs CRDF's -58.9%
Efficiency (ROA)TGTX logoTGTX42.8% ROA vs CRDF's -71.5%, ROIC 16.4% vs -118.9%

CRDF vs TGTX vs MGNX vs IMVT vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CRDFCardiff Oncology, Inc.
FY 2020
Royalty
100.0%$365,993
TGTXTG Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
98.5%$607M
Royalty
0.9%$6M
Other Revenue
0.6%$4M
License Revenue
0.0%$152,000
MGNXMacroGenics, Inc.
FY 2025
Revenue From Collaborative Agreements
62.4%$87M
Contract Manufacturing
37.6%$53M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M

CRDF vs TGTX vs MGNX vs IMVT vs IQV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTGTXLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

IQV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRDF's -85.3%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$525,000$700M$157M$0$16.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$46M$150M-$57M-$532M$3.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$45M$462M-$70M-$506M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$37M-$14M-$72M-$407M$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-21.5%+83.0%+69.9%+26.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-90.3%+21.3%-40.5%+13.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-85.3%+66.0%-44.8%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-71.4%-2.0%-45.6%+16.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-62.4%+69.6%+57.5%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.7%+2.9%+10.8%-14.1%+15.0%
TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 17.3x trailing earnings, TGTX trades at a 25% valuation discount to IQV's 23.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IQV's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 61.0x.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Market CapShares × price$109M$7.4B$255M$6.8B$30.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$92M$7.5B$304M$5.8B$44.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.30x17.35x-3.40x-11.87x23.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.35.88x14.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple61.00x13.09x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue183.32x11.94x1.70x1.88x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.34x11.97x4.56x7.04x4.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.98x
IQV leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TGTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-148 for MGNX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGTX scores 4/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-95.5%+87.4%-147.8%-68.2%+22.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-71.5%+42.8%-28.4%-62.2%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-118.9%+16.4%-144.1%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-75.8%+17.7%-34.7%-68.3%+11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934224
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.40x1.92x0.00x2.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$17M$182M$50M-$902M$14.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$79M$57M$902M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$832,000$261M$107M$72,000$16.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.67x-4.78x3.10x
TGTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TGTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,880 for MGNX. Over the past 12 months, MGNX leads with a +134.5% total return vs CRDF's -58.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGTX at 22.4% vs MGNX's -11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-40.2%+64.1%+149.1%+26.9%-19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-58.9%+25.4%+134.5%+103.6%+14.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.9%+83.4%-30.6%+51.6%-14.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.8%+27.2%-81.2%+207.0%-25.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%+584.5%-84.8%+230.5%+176.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.6%+22.4%-11.5%+14.9%-5.1%
TGTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRDF's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs CRDF's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.23x0.65x1.43x1.66x1.16x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.56$49.30$4.64$36.27$247.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.36$25.28$1.19$14.32$153.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.9%+97.5%+86.4%+90.6%+73.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.173.849.151.955.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M1.9M1.0M1.9M1.5M
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CRDF as "Buy", TGTX as "Buy", MGNX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.6% upside for MGNX (target: $6) vs 13.4% for TGTX (target: $55).

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.00$54.50$6.00$43.67$222.22
# AnalystsCovering analysts1413222344
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises102
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.2%0.0%0.0%+4.0%
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TGTX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallTG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRDF vs TGTX vs MGNX vs IMVT vs IQV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRDF or TGTX or MGNX or IMVT or IQV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the stronger pick with 87. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 2% for Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF). TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (35. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CRDF or TGTX or MGNX or IMVT or IQV?

On trailing P/E, TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CRDF or TGTX or MGNX or IMVT or IQV?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -81. 2% for MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +605. 4% versus CRDF's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CRDF or TGTX or MGNX or IMVT or IQV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Cardiff Oncology, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning CRDF is approximately 243% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CRDF or TGTX or MGNX or IMVT or IQV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is pulling ahead at 87. 3% versus -13. 2% for Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -10. 3% for MacroGenics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CRDF or TGTX or MGNX or IMVT or IQV?

TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -77. 3% for Cardiff Oncology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGTX leads at 20. 0% versus -82. 6% for CRDF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRDF leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CRDF or TGTX or MGNX or IMVT or IQV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 35. 9x for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — 21. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGNX: 49. 6% to $6. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CRDF or TGTX or MGNX or IMVT or IQV?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CRDF or TGTX or MGNX or IMVT or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), +605. 4% 10Y return). Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGTX: +605. 4%, CRDF: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CRDF and TGTX and MGNX and IMVT and IQV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CRDF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGNX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.