CRESW
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud
Conglomerates
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.-90.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CRESW vs AGRO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$7.12B
5Y Perf.-11.6%
CRESW vs AGRO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CRESW | AGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $20M | $7.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $857.48B | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104.60B | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 7.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.46T | $1.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250.85B | $383M |
CRESW vs AGRO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CRESW
AGRO
| Stock | Jun 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud S.A. Warrant… (CRESW) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
| Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) | 100 | 88.4 | -11.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRESW vs AGRO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CRESW leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Adecoagro S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CRESW
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud
The Income Pick
CRESW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.85, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 28.5%, EPS growth 29.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.85, Low D/E 66.1%, current ratio 1.24x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
The Long-Run Compounder
AGRO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 44.0% 10Y total return vs CRESW's -96.6%
- +62.8% vs CRESW's -96.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CRESW | 28.5% revenue growth vs AGRO's -9.5% |
| Value | CRESW | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 7.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | CRESW | 12.2% margin vs AGRO's -0.5% |
| Stability / Safety | CRESW | Lower D/E ratio (66.1% vs 108.8%) |
| Dividends | CRESW | 100.0% yield, vs AGRO's 0.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AGRO | +62.8% vs CRESW's -96.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CRESW | 2.1% ROA vs AGRO's -0.2%, ROIC 3.9% vs -2.1% |
CRESW vs AGRO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
CRESW vs AGRO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCRESWLAGGINGAGRO
AGROAdecoagro S.A.
2leads
CRESWCresud S.A. Warrant 2…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AGROMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CRESW5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CRESW4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CRESW7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AGRO6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
AGRO2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESW is the larger business by revenue, generating $857.5B annually — 600.6x AGRO's $1.4B. CRESW is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGRO's -0.5%. On growth, AGRO holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $857.5B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89.0B | $335M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104.6B | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $103.9B | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +23.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.9% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.8% | -162.5% |
CRESW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CRESW leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CRESW's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGRO's 74.4x.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $7.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $892M | $8.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.29x | -842.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.43x | 74.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 5.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 3.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.50x | 345.78x |
CRESW leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRESW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRESW delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-1 for AGRO. CRESW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGRO's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRESW scores 6/9 vs AGRO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | -0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | -2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.21T | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250.9B | $383M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.46T | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.40x | 0.68x |
CRESW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGRO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGRO five years ago would be worth $16,252 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $342 for CRESW. Over the past 12 months, AGRO leads with a +62.8% total return vs CRESW's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGRO at 20.3% vs CRESW's -53.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.5% | +79.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.2% | +62.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +74.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +62.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +44.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.2% | +20.3% |
AGRO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGRO is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRESW's 2.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AGRO currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs CRESW's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.85x | -0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.53 | $15.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $6.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +87.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 19.0 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 1.8M |
AGRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CRESW and AGRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CRESW offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs AGRO's 0.49%.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $132.05 | $0.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +58.0% | +0.1% |
Evenly matched — CRESW and AGRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CRESW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AGRO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallCresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08… (CRESW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CRESW vs AGRO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRESW or AGRO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is the stronger pick with 28. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO). Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CRESW or AGRO?
Over the past 5 years, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) delivered a total return of +62. 5%, compared to -96. 6% for Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGRO returned +44. 0% versus CRESW's -96. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CRESW or AGRO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud's 2. 85β — meaning CRESW is approximately -3653% more volatile than AGRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 109% for Adecoagro S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CRESW or AGRO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is pulling ahead at 28. 5% versus -9. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -109. 1% for Adecoagro S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRESW leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CRESW or AGRO?
Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 5% net margin versus -0. 6% for Adecoagro S. A. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRESW leads at 16. 5% versus -5. 7% for AGRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRESW leads at 37. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CRESW or AGRO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO).
07Is CRESW or AGRO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08)). Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) carries a higher beta of 2. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGRO: +44. 0%, CRESW: -96. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CRESW and AGRO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRESW (Industrials) and AGRO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRESW is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CRESW pays a dividend while AGRO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CRESW: -12.9% · AGRO: 11.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Closest Rival
Compare CRESW vs CRESY
CRESY is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CRESW.
Closest Rival
Compare AGRO vs CRESY
CRESY is one of the most direct listed alternatives to AGRO.
Expand Peer Set
Expand With CRESY + LND
CRESY and LND are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.