Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRESW vs LND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
CRESW vs LND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $20M | $383M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $857.48B | $821M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104.60B | $-82M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 36.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 9.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.46T | $1.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250.85B | $160M |
CRESW vs LND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud S.A. Warrant… (CRESW) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
| BrasilAgro - Compan… (LND) | 100 | 69.5 | -30.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRESW vs LND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRESW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.85, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 28.5%, EPS growth 29.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.0%
- 28.5% revenue growth vs LND's 3.8%
LND is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 109.0% 10Y total return vs CRESW's -96.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 60.2%, current ratio 1.79x
- Beta 0.50, yield 8.2%, current ratio 1.79x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.5% revenue growth vs LND's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs LND's -10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs CRESW's 2.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs LND's 8.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.0% vs CRESW's -96.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.1% ROA vs LND's -2.1%, ROIC 3.9% vs 2.1% |
CRESW vs LND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESW is the larger business by revenue, generating $857.5B annually — 1043.9x LND's $821M. CRESW is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LND's -10.0%. On growth, CRESW holds the edge at -12.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $857.5B | $821M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89.0B | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104.6B | -$82M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $103.9B | $74M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +36.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | -10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.9% | -57.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.8% | -97.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CRESW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, CRESW trades at a 98% valuation discount to LND's 13.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRESW's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LND's 28.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $383M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $892M | $616M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.29x | 13.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.43x | 28.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 1.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.50x | 31.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRESW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRESW delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-4 for LND. LND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRESW's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRESW scores 6/9 vs LND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | -3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.21T | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250.9B | $160M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.46T | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.40x | 0.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LND leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LND five years ago would be worth $9,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $342 for CRESW. Over the past 12 months, LND leads with a +10.0% total return vs CRESW's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LND at 1.1% vs CRESW's -53.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.5% | +7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.2% | +10.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +109.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.2% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
LND leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LND is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRESW's 2.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LND currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs CRESW's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.85x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.53 | $4.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $3.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 19.0 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 108K |
Analyst Outlook
CRESW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CRESW offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs LND's 8.21%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +8.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $132.05 | $1.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +58.0% | 0.0% |
CRESW leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LND leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
CRESW vs LND: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRESW or LND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is the stronger pick with 28. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND). Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRESW or LND?
On trailing P/E, Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas at 13. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRESW or LND?
Over the past 5 years, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) delivered a total return of -3.
9%, compared to -96. 6% for Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LND returned +109. 0% versus CRESW's -96. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRESW or LND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud's 2. 85β — meaning CRESW is approximately 475% more volatile than LND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 66% for Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRESW or LND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is pulling ahead at 28. 5% versus 3. 8% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -39. 2% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRESW leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRESW or LND?
BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus 10. 5% for Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRESW leads at 16. 5% versus 8. 4% for LND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRESW leads at 37. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CRESW or LND?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 8. 2% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND).
08Is CRESW or LND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 8. 2% yield, +109. 0% 10Y return). Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) carries a higher beta of 2. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LND: +109. 0%, CRESW: -96. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CRESW and LND?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRESW (Industrials) and LND (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRESW is a small-cap high-growth stock; LND is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare CRESW vs CRESY
CRESY is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CRESW.
Compare LND vs CRESY
CRESY is one of the most direct listed alternatives to LND.
Expand With CRESY + AGRO
CRESY and AGRO are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.