CRESW
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud
Conglomerates
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.-90.1%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CRESW vs LND vs CRESY vs AGRO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LND
BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$382M
5Y Perf.-30.5%
CRESY
Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria
Conglomerates
Market Cap$727M
5Y Perf.+97.9%
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$6.89B
5Y Perf.-11.6%
CRESW vs LND vs CRESY vs AGRO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CRESW | LND | CRESY | AGRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Agricultural Farm Products | Conglomerates | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $20M | $382M | $727M | $6.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $857.48B | $821M | $1.05T | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104.60B | $-82M | $234.51B | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 36.4% | 42.0% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 9.3% | 62.1% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 13.7x | 9999.0x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.46T | $1.31B | $1.46T | $1.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250.85B | $160M | $250.85B | $383M |
CRESW vs LND vs CRESY vs AGRO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CRESW
LND
CRESY
AGRO
| Stock | Jun 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud S.A. Warrant… (CRESW) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
| BrasilAgro - Compan… (LND) | 100 | 69.5 | -30.5% |
| Cresud Sociedad Anó… (CRESY) | 100 | 197.9 | +97.9% |
| Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) | 100 | 88.4 | -11.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRESW vs LND vs CRESY vs AGRO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CRESW leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. LND and AGRO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CRESW
Cresud S.A. Warrant 2021-08.03.26 on Cresud
The Income Pick
CRESW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.85, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 28.5%, EPS growth 29.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.0%
- 28.5% revenue growth vs AGRO's -9.5%
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 6.9x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LND
BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas
The Defensive Pick
LND is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 60.2%, current ratio 1.79x
- Beta 0.50, yield 8.2%, current ratio 1.79x
- Beta 0.50 vs CRESW's 2.85, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CRESY
Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria
The Long-Run Compounder
CRESY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 64.4% 10Y total return vs LND's 112.5%
- 22.3% margin vs LND's -10.0%
- 4.3% ROA vs LND's -2.1%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
The Momentum Pick
AGRO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +58.7% vs CRESW's -96.2%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CRESW | 28.5% revenue growth vs AGRO's -9.5% |
| Value | CRESW | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 6.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | CRESY | 22.3% margin vs LND's -10.0% |
| Stability / Safety | LND | Beta 0.50 vs CRESW's 2.85, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CRESW | 100.0% yield, vs AGRO's 0.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AGRO | +58.7% vs CRESW's -96.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CRESY | 4.3% ROA vs LND's -2.1%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.1% |
CRESW vs LND vs CRESY vs AGRO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
CRESW vs LND vs CRESY vs AGRO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCRESYLAGGINGAGRO
Who Leads Where
CRESY leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRESW leads 1 • LND leads 0 • AGRO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓AGROAdecoagro S.A.
0leads
LNDBrasilAgro - Companhi…
0leads
CRESWCresud S.A. Warrant 2…
1leads
CRESYCresud Sociedad Anóni…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CRESWvs LNDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CRESY5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CRESW4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CRESY4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CRESY3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.05T annually — 1281.4x LND's $821M. CRESY is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LND's -10.0%. On growth, CRESY holds the edge at +50.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | LNDBrasilAgro - Comp… | CRESYCresud Sociedad A… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $857.5B | $821M | $1.05T | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89.0B | $150M | $670.2B | $335M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104.6B | -$82M | $234.5B | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $103.9B | $74M | $116.8B | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +36.4% | +42.0% | +23.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +9.3% | +62.1% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | -10.0% | +22.3% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +9.0% | +11.1% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.9% | -57.1% | +50.4% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.8% | -97.3% | +2.6% | -162.5% |
CRESY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CRESW leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, CRESW trades at a 100% valuation discount to CRESY's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRESW's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGRO's 72.5x.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | LNDBrasilAgro - Comp… | CRESYCresud Sociedad A… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $382M | $727M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $892M | $614M | $1.6B | $8.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.29x | 13.74x | 9999.00x | -815.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 6.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.43x | 28.48x | 9.60x | 72.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 1.79x | 1.10x | 5.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.87x | 0.47x | 3.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.50x | 31.83x | 9.55x | 334.52x |
CRESW leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRESY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRESY delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-4 for LND. LND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGRO's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRESW scores 6/9 vs AGRO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | LNDBrasilAgro - Comp… | CRESYCresud Sociedad A… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | -3.9% | +10.1% | -0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -2.1% | +4.3% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +2.1% | +5.7% | -2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +2.8% | +6.4% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.60x | 0.66x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.21T | $1.2B | $1.21T | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250.9B | $160M | $250.9B | $383M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.46T | $1.3B | $1.46T | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.40x | 0.10x | 3.48x | 0.68x |
CRESY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRESY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRESY five years ago would be worth $23,277 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $342 for CRESW. Over the past 12 months, AGRO leads with a +58.7% total return vs CRESW's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRESY at 34.1% vs CRESW's -53.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | LNDBrasilAgro - Comp… | CRESYCresud Sociedad A… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.5% | +7.0% | -9.4% | +73.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.2% | +9.4% | +10.5% | +58.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +3.2% | +140.9% | +68.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | -4.9% | +132.8% | +50.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +112.5% | +64.4% | +39.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.2% | +1.1% | +34.1% | +19.1% |
CRESY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LND and AGRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGRO is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRESW's 2.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LND currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs CRESW's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | LNDBrasilAgro - Comp… | CRESYCresud Sociedad A… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.85x | 0.50x | 1.19x | -0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.53 | $4.43 | $14.21 | $15.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $3.47 | $8.32 | $6.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +86.4% | +79.0% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 19.0 | 41.0 | 50.8 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 64K | 109K | 272K | 1.8M |
Evenly matched — LND and AGRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CRESW and AGRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRESY as "Buy", AGRO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.9% upside for CRESY (target: $13) vs -36.4% for AGRO (target: $9). For income investors, CRESW offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs AGRO's 0.51%.
| Metric | CRESWCresud S.A. Warra… | LNDBrasilAgro - Comp… | CRESYCresud Sociedad A… | AGROAdecoagro S.A. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $12.68 | $8.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +8.2% | +8.5% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $132.05 | $1.56 | $1320.71 | $0.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +58.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.1% |
Evenly matched — CRESW and AGRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CRESY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRESW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallCresud Sociedad Anónima, Co… (CRESY)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CRESW vs LND vs CRESY vs AGRO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRESW or LND or CRESY or AGRO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is the stronger pick with 28. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO). Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRESW or LND or CRESY or AGRO?
On trailing P/E, Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria at 9999. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRESW or LND or CRESY or AGRO?
Over the past 5 years, Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) delivered a total return of +132.
8%, compared to -96. 6% for Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LND returned +112. 5% versus CRESW's -96. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRESW or LND or CRESY or AGRO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud's 2. 85β — meaning CRESW is approximately -3653% more volatile than AGRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 109% for Adecoagro S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRESW or LND or CRESY or AGRO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cresud S.
A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) is pulling ahead at 28. 5% versus -9. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -109. 1% for Adecoagro S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRESW leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRESW or LND or CRESY or AGRO?
BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus -0. 6% for Adecoagro S. A. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRESY leads at 24. 2% versus -5. 7% for AGRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRESY leads at 39. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRESW or LND or CRESY or AGRO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRESY: 12.
9% to $12. 68.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRESW or LND or CRESY or AGRO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO).
09Is CRESW or LND or CRESY or AGRO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 0. 5% yield). Cresud S. A. Warrant 2021-08. 03. 26 on Cresud (CRESW) carries a higher beta of 2. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGRO: +39. 9%, CRESW: -96. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRESW and LND and CRESY and AGRO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRESW (Industrials) and LND (Consumer Defensive) and CRESY (Industrials) and AGRO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRESW is a small-cap high-growth stock; LND is a small-cap deep-value stock; CRESY is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CRESW: -12.9% · LND: -57.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CRESW: 0.3x · LND: 13.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.