Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRESY vs AGRO vs LND vs FPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Agricultural Farm Products
REIT - Specialty
CRESY vs AGRO vs LND vs FPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $727M | $6.89B | $382M | $462M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.05T | $1.43B | $821M | $54M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $234.51B | $-8M | $-82M | $30M |
| Gross Margin | 42.0% | 23.4% | 36.4% | 78.7% |
| Operating Margin | 62.1% | 4.4% | 9.3% | 45.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9999.0x | 6.9x | 13.7x | 49.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.46T | $1.95B | $1.31B | $161M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250.85B | $383M | $160M | $9M |
CRESY vs AGRO vs LND vs FPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud Sociedad Anó… (CRESY) | 100 | 364.6 | +264.6% |
| Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) | 100 | 310.2 | +210.2% |
| BrasilAgro - Compan… (LND) | 100 | 100.5 | +0.5% |
| Farmland Partners I… (FPI) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRESY vs AGRO vs LND vs FPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRESY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 28.5%, EPS growth -99.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.0%
- 64.4% 10Y total return vs LND's 112.5%
- 28.5% revenue growth vs FPI's -10.4%
- 4.3% ROA vs LND's -2.1%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.1%
AGRO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 49.6x)
- +58.7% vs LND's +9.4%
LND is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 60.2%, current ratio 1.79x
- Beta 0.50 vs CRESY's 1.19, lower leverage
FPI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 11.7%
- Beta 0.56, yield 11.7%, current ratio 537.08x
- 56.0% margin vs LND's -10.0%
- 11.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AGRO's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.5% revenue growth vs FPI's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 49.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.0% margin vs LND's -10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs CRESY's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AGRO's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.7% vs LND's +9.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs LND's -2.1%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.1% |
CRESY vs AGRO vs LND vs FPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CRESY vs AGRO vs LND vs FPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRESY leads in 2 of 6 categories
FPI leads 1 • AGRO leads 0 • LND leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CRESY and FPI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.05T annually — 19553.7x FPI's $54M. FPI is the more profitable business, keeping 56.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LND's -10.0%. On growth, CRESY holds the edge at +50.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.05T | $1.4B | $821M | $54M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $670.2B | $335M | $150M | $28M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $234.5B | -$8M | -$82M | $30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $116.8B | $37M | $74M | $19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.0% | +23.4% | +36.4% | +78.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +62.1% | +4.4% | +9.3% | +45.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | -0.5% | -10.0% | +56.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +2.6% | +9.0% | +35.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.4% | +11.1% | -57.1% | -1.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | -162.5% | -97.3% | -64.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CRESY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, LND trades at a 100% valuation discount to CRESY's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRESY's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGRO's 72.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $727M | $6.9B | $382M | $462M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $8.5B | $614M | $614M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9999.00x | -815.24x | 13.74x | 17.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.85x | — | 49.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.60x | 72.46x | 28.48x | 22.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 5.01x | 1.79x | 8.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.47x | 3.82x | 0.87x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.55x | 334.52x | 31.83x | 26.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FPI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRESY delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-4 for LND. FPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGRO's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FPI scores 6/9 vs LND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | -0.5% | -3.9% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -0.2% | -2.1% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | -2.1% | +2.1% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | -2.3% | +2.8% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 1.09x | 0.60x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.21T | $1.6B | $1.2B | $152M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250.9B | $383M | $160M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.46T | $1.9B | $1.3B | $161M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.48x | 0.68x | 0.10x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRESY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRESY five years ago would be worth $23,277 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,127 for FPI. Over the past 12 months, AGRO leads with a +58.7% total return vs LND's +9.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRESY at 34.1% vs LND's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.4% | +73.8% | +7.0% | +11.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.5% | +58.7% | +9.4% | +10.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.9% | +68.9% | +3.2% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.8% | +50.1% | -4.9% | -8.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.4% | +39.9% | +112.5% | +29.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.1% | +19.1% | +1.1% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AGRO and LND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGRO is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRESY's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LND currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs CRESY's 79.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | -0.08x | 0.50x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.21 | $15.89 | $4.43 | $13.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.32 | $6.89 | $3.47 | $9.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.0% | +84.1% | +86.4% | +80.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 51.7 | 41.0 | 33.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 272K | 1.8M | 109K | 394K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AGRO and FPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRESY as "Buy", AGRO as "Hold", FPI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.6% upside for FPI (target: $17) vs -36.4% for AGRO (target: $9). For income investors, FPI offers the higher dividend yield at 11.75% vs AGRO's 0.51%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.68 | $8.50 | — | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 8 | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.5% | +0.5% | +8.2% | +11.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1320.71 | $0.07 | $1.56 | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +8.3% |
CRESY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FPI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CRESY vs AGRO vs LND vs FPI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRESY or AGRO or LND or FPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) is the stronger pick with 28.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI). BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRESY or AGRO or LND or FPI?
On trailing P/E, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the cheapest at 13.
7x versus Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Adecoagro S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRESY or AGRO or LND or FPI?
Over the past 5 years, Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) delivered a total return of +132.
8%, compared to -8. 7% for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LND returned +112. 5% versus FPI's +29. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRESY or AGRO or LND or FPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria's 1. 19β — meaning CRESY is approximately -1585% more volatile than AGRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 109% for Adecoagro S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRESY or AGRO or LND or FPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) is pulling ahead at 28.
5% versus -10. 4% for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas grew EPS -39. 2% year-over-year, compared to -109. 1% for Adecoagro S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRESY leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRESY or AGRO or LND or FPI?
Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 5% net margin versus -0. 6% for Adecoagro S. A. — meaning it keeps 60. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FPI leads at 44. 2% versus -5. 7% for AGRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FPI leads at 64. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRESY or AGRO or LND or FPI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 49. 6x for Farmland Partners Inc. — 42. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FPI: 60. 6% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRESY or AGRO or LND or FPI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) offers the highest yield at 11. 7%, versus 0. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO).
09Is CRESY or AGRO or LND or FPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 0. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGRO: +39. 9%, CRESY: +64. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRESY and AGRO and LND and FPI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRESY (Industrials) and AGRO (Consumer Defensive) and LND (Consumer Defensive) and FPI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRESY is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LND is a small-cap deep-value stock; FPI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.