Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CREV vs HXL vs MTRN vs AVAV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Industrial Materials
Aerospace & Defense
CREV vs HXL vs MTRN vs AVAV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Materials | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $775K | $7.22B | $3.97B | $8.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58M | $1.93B | $1.92B | $1.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $118M | $76M | $-224M |
| Gross Margin | -40.2% | 24.2% | 15.8% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | -63.3% | 9.5% | 6.1% | -8.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.5x | 31.2x | 58.4x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $993M | $601M | $64M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $71M | $14M | $41M |
CREV vs HXL vs MTRN vs AVAV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Revolution P… (CREV) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Hexcel Corporation (HXL) | 100 | 133.7 | +33.7% |
| Materion Corporation (MTRN) | 100 | 144.2 | +44.2% |
| AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) | 100 | 183.3 | +83.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREV vs HXL vs MTRN vs AVAV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 86.8%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 86.8% revenue growth vs HXL's -0.5%
HXL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 0.7%
- Beta 1.05, yield 0.7%, current ratio 2.26x
- 6.1% margin vs CREV's -79.6%
- Beta 1.05 vs CREV's 1.92
MTRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs AVAV's 498.3%
- PEG 0.85 vs HXL's 1.42
- Lower P/E (31.2x vs 58.4x)
- +163.9% vs CREV's -85.9%
AVAV is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.52x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.8% revenue growth vs HXL's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.2x vs 58.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.1% margin vs CREV's -79.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs CREV's 1.92 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MTRN's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.9% vs CREV's -85.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs CREV's -25.2%, ROIC 6.0% vs -27.1% |
CREV vs HXL vs MTRN vs AVAV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CREV vs HXL vs MTRN vs AVAV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HXL leads in 3 of 6 categories
MTRN leads 2 • CREV leads 0 • AVAV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HXL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HXL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 33.5x CREV's $58M. HXL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREV's -79.6%. On growth, AVAV holds the edge at +143.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58M | $1.9B | $1.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | $306M | $187M | $82M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $118M | $76M | -$224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | $251M | $7M | -$183M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +24.2% | +15.8% | +21.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -63.3% | +9.5% | +6.1% | -8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.6% | +6.1% | +4.0% | -13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -107.6% | +13.0% | +0.4% | -11.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +107.9% | +8.3% | +30.8% | +143.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -156.9% | +40.0% | +8.2% | -51.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MTRN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 53.4x trailing earnings, MTRN trades at a 51% valuation discount to AVAV's 108.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MTRN offers better value at 1.45x vs HXL's 2.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $775,174 | $7.2B | $4.0B | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78M | $8.1B | $4.6B | $8.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 69.91x | 53.37x | 108.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.47x | 31.15x | 58.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.39x | 1.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.72x | 24.67x | 102.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 3.81x | 2.22x | 10.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.13x | 4.24x | 5.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.51x | 79.54x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HXL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HXL delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-6 for AVAV. AVAV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HXL's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HXL scores 6/9 vs AVAV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +8.4% | +8.2% | -6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.2% | +4.3% | +4.2% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +6.0% | +6.0% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +7.2% | +7.7% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.79x | 0.64x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $107M | $922M | $587M | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $71M | $14M | $41M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $993M | $601M | $64M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.46x | 4.45x | 4.07x | -5.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTRN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTRN five years ago would be worth $25,559 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for CREV. Over the past 12 months, MTRN leads with a +163.9% total return vs CREV's -85.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTRN at 22.7% vs CREV's -76.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -76.8% | +25.0% | +48.8% | -34.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.9% | +90.9% | +163.9% | +5.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +33.8% | +84.9% | +63.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +80.6% | +155.6% | +53.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +127.9% | +724.3% | +498.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.1% | +10.2% | +22.7% | +17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
HXL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HXL is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CREV's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HXL currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs CREV's 4.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.08x | 1.67x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.20 | $98.26 | $201.88 | $417.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $50.40 | $70.94 | $155.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.4% | +97.5% | +94.6% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.2 | 65.1 | 71.0 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 188K | 1.2M | 232K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HXL and MTRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HXL as "Hold", MTRN as "Buy", AVAV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.3% upside for AVAV (target: $344) vs -15.7% for MTRN (target: $161). For income investors, HXL offers the higher dividend yield at 0.70% vs MTRN's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $90.25 | $161.00 | $343.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 10 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 13 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.67 | $0.55 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.3% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
HXL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MTRN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CREV vs HXL vs MTRN vs AVAV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREV or HXL or MTRN or AVAV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) is the stronger pick with 86.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Hexcel Corporation (HXL). Materion Corporation (MTRN) offers the better valuation at 53. 4x trailing P/E (31. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Materion Corporation (MTRN) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CREV or HXL or MTRN or AVAV?
On trailing P/E, Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the cheapest at 53.
4x versus AeroVironment, Inc. at 108. 5x. On forward P/E, Materion Corporation is actually cheaper at 31. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Materion Corporation wins at 0. 85x versus Hexcel Corporation's 1. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CREV or HXL or MTRN or AVAV?
Over the past 5 years, Materion Corporation (MTRN) delivered a total return of +155.
6%, compared to -98. 6% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTRN returned +759. 2% versus CREV's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CREV or HXL or MTRN or AVAV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hexcel Corporation (HXL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
08β versus Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 69β — meaning CREV is approximately 56% more volatile than HXL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 79% for Hexcel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CREV or HXL or MTRN or AVAV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) is pulling ahead at 86.
8% versus -0. 5% for Hexcel Corporation (HXL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Materion Corporation grew EPS 1179% year-over-year, compared to -28. 9% for AeroVironment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CREV leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CREV or HXL or MTRN or AVAV?
Hexcel Corporation (HXL) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
8% net margin versus -309. 4% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HXL leads at 9. 1% versus -235. 9% for CREV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVAV leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CREV or HXL or MTRN or AVAV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 85x versus Hexcel Corporation's 1. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Materion Corporation (MTRN) trades at 31. 2x forward P/E versus 58. 4x for AeroVironment, Inc. — 27. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVAV: 104. 3% to $343. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — CREV or HXL or MTRN or AVAV?
In this comparison, HXL (0.
7% yield), MTRN (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CREV, AVAV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CREV or HXL or MTRN or AVAV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hexcel Corporation (HXL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
08), 0. 7% yield, +126. 9% 10Y return). Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HXL: +126. 9%, CREV: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CREV and HXL and MTRN and AVAV?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREV (Consumer Cyclical) and HXL (Industrials) and MTRN (Basic Materials) and AVAV (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREV is a small-cap high-growth stock; HXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVAV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HXL pays a dividend while CREV, MTRN, AVAV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.