CREVW
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant
Auto - Parts
Market Cap—
5Y Perf.-93.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CREVW vs HXL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HXL
Hexcel Corporation
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$7.22B
5Y Perf.+10.0%
CREVW vs HXL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CREVW | HXL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | — | $7.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $1.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-221M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | -155.1% | 24.2% |
| Operating Margin | -235.9% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.8x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $993M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $71M |
CREVW vs HXL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CREVW
HXL
| Stock | Nov 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Revolution P… (CREVW) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.8% |
| Hexcel Corporation (HXL) | 100 | 110.0 | +10.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREVW vs HXL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HXL leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CREVW
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant
The Income Pick
CREVW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.80
- Rev growth 86.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 0.86x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HXL
Hexcel Corporation
The Quality Compounder
HXL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 6.1% margin vs CREVW's -309.4%
- 0.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +90.9% vs CREVW's -89.7%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CREVW | 86.8% revenue growth vs HXL's -0.5% |
| Quality / Margins | HXL | 6.1% margin vs CREVW's -309.4% |
| Stability / Safety | CREVW | Beta 0.80 vs HXL's 1.05 |
| Dividends | HXL | 0.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | HXL | +90.9% vs CREVW's -89.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HXL | 4.3% ROA vs CREVW's -198.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -27.1% |
CREVW vs HXL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
CREVW vs HXL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLHXLLAGGINGCREVW
CREVWCarbon Revolution Pub…
0leads
HXLHexcel Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CREVWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HXL4/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
—
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
HXL5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
HXL2/2
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HXL leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HXL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 27.0x CREVW's $71M. HXL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREVW's -3.1%.
| Metric | CREVWCarbon Revolution… | HXLHexcel Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $306M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $251M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -155.1% | +24.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.6% | +13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +40.0% |
HXL leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CREVWCarbon Revolution… | HXLHexcel Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $8.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 69.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.51x |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Profitability & Efficiency
HXL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HXL scores 6/9 vs CREVW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CREVWCarbon Revolution… | HXLHexcel Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -198.1% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $107M | $922M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $71M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $993M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.46x | 4.45x |
HXL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HXL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, HXL leads with a +90.9% total return vs CREVW's -89.7%.
| Metric | CREVWCarbon Revolution… | HXLHexcel Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.4% | +25.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.7% | +90.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +33.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +127.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +10.2% |
HXL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CREVW and HXL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CREVW is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HXL's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HXL currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs CREVW's 6.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CREVWCarbon Revolution… | HXLHexcel Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.05 | $98.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $50.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.8% | +97.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.2 | 65.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 61K | 1.2M |
Evenly matched — CREVW and HXL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
HXL is the only dividend payer here at 0.70% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CREVWCarbon Revolution… | HXLHexcel Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $90.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +6.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
HXL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallHexcel Corporation (HXL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CREVW vs HXL: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREVW or HXL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger pick with 86.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Hexcel Corporation (HXL). Hexcel Corporation (HXL) offers the better valuation at 69. 9x trailing P/E (41. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hexcel Corporation (HXL) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — CREVW or HXL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Hexcel Corporation's 1. 05β — meaning HXL is approximately 31% more volatile than CREVW relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — CREVW or HXL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is pulling ahead at 86.
8% versus -0. 5% for Hexcel Corporation (HXL). Over a 3-year CAGR, CREVW leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — CREVW or HXL?
Hexcel Corporation (HXL) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
8% net margin versus -309. 4% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HXL leads at 9. 1% versus -235. 9% for CREVW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HXL leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CREVW or HXL?
In this comparison, HXL (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CREVW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is CREVW or HXL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hexcel Corporation (HXL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
05), 0. 7% yield, +127. 9% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CREVW and HXL?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREVW (Consumer Cyclical) and HXL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREVW is a small-cap high-growth stock; HXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HXL pays a dividend while CREVW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CREVW: 86.8% · HXL: 8.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.