Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CREVW vs MPAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
CREVW vs MPAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | — | $220M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $771M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-221M | $2M |
| Gross Margin | -155.1% | 19.2% |
| Operating Margin | -235.9% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $201M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $9M |
CREVW vs MPAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Revolution P… (CREVW) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.8% |
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 136.7 | +36.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREVW vs MPAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREVW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.80
- Rev growth 86.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 0.86x
MPAA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 0.3% margin vs CREVW's -309.4%
- +24.3% vs CREVW's -89.7%
- 0.2% ROA vs CREVW's -198.1%, ROIC 6.2% vs -27.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.8% revenue growth vs MPAA's 5.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs CREVW's -309.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs MPAA's 0.99 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.3% vs CREVW's -89.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs CREVW's -198.1%, ROIC 6.2% vs -27.1% |
CREVW vs MPAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CREVW vs MPAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPAA is the larger business by revenue, generating $771M annually — 10.8x CREVW's $71M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.3% (MPAA) to -3.1% (CREVW).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $771M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -155.1% | +19.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.6% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $220M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $412M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -11.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPAA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPAA scores 7/9 vs CREVW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -198.1% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $107M | $192M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $201M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.46x | 0.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPAA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, MPAA leads with a +24.3% total return vs CREVW's -89.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.4% | -7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.7% | +24.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +143.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -51.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -62.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +34.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CREVW and MPAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CREVW is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPAA's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPAA currently trades 63.3% from its 52-week high vs CREVW's 6.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.05 | $18.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $9.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.8% | +63.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.2 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 61K | 87K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +2.2% |
MPAA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
CREVW vs MPAA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREVW or MPAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger pick with 86.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 5% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Analysts rate Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — CREVW or MPAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning MPAA is approximately 23% more volatile than CREVW relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — CREVW or MPAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is pulling ahead at 86.
8% versus 5. 5% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Over a 3-year CAGR, CREVW leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — CREVW or MPAA?
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
(MPAA) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 6% net margin versus -309. 4% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant — meaning it keeps -2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPAA leads at 5. 3% versus -235. 9% for CREVW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPAA leads at 20. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CREVW or MPAA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is CREVW or MPAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80)). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CREVW and MPAA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CREVW is a small-cap high-growth stock; MPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare MPAA vs DORM
DORM is one of the most direct listed alternatives to MPAA.
Compare CREVW vs CREV
CREV is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CREVW.
Expand With DORM + THRM
DORM and THRM are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.