Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CRIS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CRIS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $76M | $6.87B | $2.50B | $5.53B | $6.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $700M | $236M | $0.00 | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $462M | $-369M | $-464M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | 99.5% | 83.0% | 90.7% | — | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | -348.4% | 21.3% | -168.6% | — | -7.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 32.3x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $261M | $99M | $98K | $82M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $79M | $222M | $714M | $357M |
CRIS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curis, Inc. (CRIS) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX) | 100 | 173.4 | +73.4% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 104.2 | +4.2% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 265.3 | +165.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRIS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRIS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.77
- Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 436.5% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
- 87.3% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +209.6% vs CRIS's -72.0%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 87.3% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs RCUS's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs CRIS's -72.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.8% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
CRIS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CRIS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 1 • CRIS leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $700M and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $700M | $236M | $0 | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | $150M | -$391M | -$487M | -$352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $462M | -$369M | -$464M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | -$14M | -$489M | -$423M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.5% | +83.0% | +90.7% | — | +33.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +21.3% | -168.6% | — | -7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -80.3% | +66.0% | -156.4% | — | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -2.0% | -2.1% | — | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.0% | +69.6% | -39.3% | — | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +198.4% | +2.9% | +10.5% | +19.7% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CRIS and RCUS and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $76M | $6.9B | $2.5B | $5.5B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $73M | $7.1B | $2.4B | $4.8B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.99x | 15.53x | -7.54x | -9.97x | -22.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 32.25x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 57.07x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.04x | 11.15x | 10.11x | — | 176.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.91x | 10.72x | 4.22x | 5.83x | 4.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-139 for CRIS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGTX's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGTX scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -138.8% | +87.4% | -69.0% | -47.1% | -25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.1% | +42.8% | -35.3% | -44.1% | -22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +16.4% | -64.1% | — | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +17.7% | -42.1% | -66.1% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.40x | 0.16x | 0.00x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $182M | -$123M | -$714M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $79M | $222M | $714M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $261M | $99M | $98,000 | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -107.35x | 5.67x | -13.38x | — | -2119.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28 for CRIS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs CRIS's -72.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.0% vs CRIS's -67.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.1% | +46.9% | +6.5% | +5.1% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.0% | +23.5% | +209.6% | +96.1% | +190.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +30.0% | +24.9% | +40.9% | +205.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +7.0% | -18.6% | +62.4% | +92.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +436.5% | +45.9% | +173.6% | +154.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.0% | +9.1% | +7.7% | +12.1% | +45.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs CRIS's 18.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 0.77x | 1.95x | 1.37x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.13 | $44.00 | $28.72 | $30.09 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.49 | $25.28 | $7.06 | $13.36 | $28.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.4% | +97.8% | +86.3% | +90.5% | +82.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 74.2 | 60.5 | 60.2 | 54.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 444K | 2.1M | 1.2M | 1.4M | 602K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TGTX as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs -9.4% for TGTX (target: $39).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.00 | $30.00 | $45.50 | $117.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 18 | 23 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KYMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CRIS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRIS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the stronger pick with 87. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (32. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CRIS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -99. 7% for Curis, Inc. (CRIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +436. 5% versus CRIS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CRIS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 152% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 40% for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CRIS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is pulling ahead at 87. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CRIS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGTX leads at 20. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CRIS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 67.
2% to $45. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — CRIS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CRIS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), +436. 5% 10Y return). Curis, Inc. (CRIS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGTX: +436. 5%, CRIS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CRIS and TGTX and RCUS and IMVT and KYMR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.