Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries |
| Market Cap | $981M | $122M | $660M | $195M | $26.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $193M | $294M | $1.17B | $361M | $9.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-327M | $-2.95B | $41M | $1.11B |
| Gross Margin | 32.5% | 22.8% | 28.0% | 62.7% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | -24.1% | -266.0% | 13.3% | 34.5% |
| Forward P/E | 34.3x | — | — | 164.2x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $348M | $451M | $104M | $12.11B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $792M | $114M | $304M | $184M | $68M |
CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) | 100 | 39.4 | -60.6% |
| Canopy Growth Corpo… (CGC) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY) | 100 | 57.5 | -42.5% |
| Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| Constellation Brand… (STZ) | 100 | 87.0 | -13.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 64.4%, EPS growth -100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 19.59x
- Beta 0.98, current ratio 19.59x
- 64.4% revenue growth vs CGC's -9.5%
Among these 5 stocks, CGC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TLRY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +12.1% vs ACB's -25.3%
ACB is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 5.2% ROA vs TLRY's -100.6%, ROIC 0.7% vs -66.2%
STZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 2.7%
- 12.6% 10Y total return vs CRON's 14.6%
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 164.2x)
- 11.8% margin vs TLRY's -252.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.4% revenue growth vs CGC's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 164.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs TLRY's -252.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs TLRY's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.1% vs ACB's -25.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs TLRY's -100.6%, ROIC 0.7% vs -66.2% |
CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STZ leads in 2 of 6 categories
TLRY leads 1 • CRON leads 0 • CGC leads 0 • ACB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.4B annually — 48.5x CRON's $193M. STZ is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLRY's -2.5%. On growth, CRON holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $193M | $294M | $1.2B | $361M | $9.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$810,000 | -$32M | -$3.0B | $71M | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$327M | -$2.9B | $41M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$163,766 | -$86M | -$94M | -$31M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +22.8% | +28.0% | +62.7% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -24.1% | -2.7% | +13.3% | +34.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | -111.0% | -2.5% | +11.2% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | -29.3% | -8.1% | -8.7% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +20.9% | +3.0% | +6.8% | -9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +83.8% | +70.7% | -94.5% | -15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TLRY and STZ each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACB's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STZ's 9.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $981M | $122M | $660M | $195M | $26.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $190M | $293M | $806M | $136M | $38.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.28x | -0.17x | 164.21x | -333.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.27x | — | — | — | 12.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 6.73x | 9.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.07x | 0.62x | 0.59x | 0.77x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 0.34x | 0.25x | 0.43x | 3.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 13.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CRON and ACB and STZ each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STZ delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-137 for TLRY. CRON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STZ's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACB scores 7/9 vs TLRY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.9% | -43.1% | -136.5% | +7.2% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | -29.5% | -100.6% | +5.2% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | -10.2% | -66.2% | +0.7% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | -12.4% | -78.1% | +0.7% | +18.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.72x | 0.22x | 0.17x | 1.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$790M | $235M | $147M | -$80M | $12.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $792M | $114M | $304M | $184M | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $348M | $451M | $104M | $12.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -7.79x | -89.43x | 6.27x | 5.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TLRY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STZ five years ago would be worth $6,992 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for CGC. Over the past 12 months, TLRY leads with a +1209.3% total return vs ACB's -25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TLRY at 26.7% vs CGC's -55.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.8% | -5.0% | -41.8% | -21.0% | +7.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.9% | -12.4% | +1209.3% | -25.3% | -18.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.1% | -91.4% | +103.6% | -47.2% | -29.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.6% | -99.6% | -65.0% | -96.1% | -30.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1457.6% | -94.3% | -74.7% | -92.0% | +12.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | -55.9% | +26.7% | -19.2% | -10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
STZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TLRY's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STZ currently trades 76.3% from its 52-week high vs TLRY's 36.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.90x | 2.03x | 1.81x | 0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.43 | $2.38 | $15.70 | $6.67 | $196.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.84 | $0.84 | $0.35 | $3.07 | $126.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +47.5% | +36.1% | +51.4% | +76.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 52.9 | 37.9 | 52.2 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 10.4M | 4.7M | 979K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRON as "Hold", CGC as "Hold", TLRY as "Hold", ACB as "Hold", STZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1180.5% upside for CGC (target: $14) vs -10.5% for CRON (target: $2). STZ is the only dividend payer here at 2.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.30 | $14.47 | $10.00 | $5.92 | $175.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 26 | 20 | 14 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $4.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.3% |
STZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). TLRY leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cronos Group Inc.
(CRON) is the stronger pick with 64. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) offers the better valuation at 164. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?
On forward P/E, Constellation Brands, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?
Over the past 5 years, Constellation Brands, Inc.
(STZ) delivered a total return of -30. 1%, compared to -99. 6% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRON returned +1458% versus CGC's -94. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Constellation Brands, Inc.
(STZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 26β versus Tilray Brands, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning TLRY is approximately 675% more volatile than STZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 170% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cronos Group Inc.
(CRON) is pulling ahead at 64. 4% versus -9. 5% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aurora Cannabis Inc. grew EPS 102. 2% year-over-year, compared to -651. 7% for Tilray Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRON leads at 30. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?
Aurora Cannabis Inc.
(ACB) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 5% net margin versus -266. 3% for Tilray Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus -277. 9% for TLRY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACB leads at 54. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Constellation Brands, Inc.
(STZ) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 34. 3x for Cronos Group Inc. — 21. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGC: 1180. 5% to $14. 47.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?
In this comparison, STZ (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CRON, CGC, TLRY, ACB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Constellation Brands, Inc.
(STZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 26), 2. 7% yield). Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STZ: +12. 6%, TLRY: -74. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRON and CGC and TLRY and ACB and STZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRON (Healthcare) and CGC (Healthcare) and TLRY (Healthcare) and ACB (Healthcare) and STZ (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRON is a small-cap high-growth stock; CGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TLRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACB is a small-cap high-growth stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. STZ pays a dividend while CRON, CGC, TLRY, ACB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.