Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRON
Cronos Group Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$981M
5Y Perf.-60.6%
CGC
Canopy Growth Corporation

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$122M
5Y Perf.-99.3%
TLRY
Tilray Brands, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$660M
5Y Perf.-42.5%
ACB
Aurora Cannabis Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$195M
5Y Perf.-97.6%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$26.05B
5Y Perf.-13.0%

CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRON logoCRON
CGC logoCGC
TLRY logoTLRY
ACB logoACB
STZ logoSTZ
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericBeverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Market Cap$981M$122M$660M$195M$26.05B
Revenue (TTM)$193M$294M$1.17B$361M$9.38B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$-327M$-2.95B$41M$1.11B
Gross Margin32.5%22.8%28.0%62.7%52.0%
Operating Margin-1.5%-24.1%-266.0%13.3%34.5%
Forward P/E34.3x164.2x12.7x
Total Debt$2M$348M$451M$104M$12.11B
Cash & Equiv.$792M$114M$304M$184M$68M

CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRON
CGC
TLRY
ACB
STZ
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cronos Group Inc. (CRON)10039.4-60.6%
Canopy Growth Corpo… (CGC)1000.7-99.3%
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY)10057.5-42.5%
Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB)1002.4-97.6%
Constellation Brand… (STZ)10087.0-13.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: STZ leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cronos Group Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. TLRY and ACB also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CRON
Cronos Group Inc.
The Growth Play

CRON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 64.4%, EPS growth -100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 19.59x
  • Beta 0.98, current ratio 19.59x
  • 64.4% revenue growth vs CGC's -9.5%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CGC
Canopy Growth Corporation
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CGC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
TLRY
Tilray Brands, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

TLRY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +12.1% vs ACB's -25.3%
Best for: momentum
ACB
Aurora Cannabis Inc.
The Niche Pick

ACB is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 5.2% ROA vs TLRY's -100.6%, ROIC 0.7% vs -66.2%
Best for: efficiency
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
The Income Pick

STZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 2.7%
  • 12.6% 10Y total return vs CRON's 14.6%
  • Lower P/E (12.7x vs 164.2x)
  • 11.8% margin vs TLRY's -252.6%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCRON logoCRON64.4% revenue growth vs CGC's -9.5%
ValueSTZ logoSTZLower P/E (12.7x vs 164.2x)
Quality / MarginsSTZ logoSTZ11.8% margin vs TLRY's -252.6%
Stability / SafetySTZ logoSTZBeta 0.26 vs TLRY's 2.03
DividendsSTZ logoSTZ2.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TLRY logoTLRY+12.1% vs ACB's -25.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ACB logoACB5.2% ROA vs TLRY's -100.6%, ROIC 0.7% vs -66.2%

CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CRONCronos Group Inc.
FY 2025
Cannabis Flower
74.0%$108M
Cannabis Extracts
25.7%$38M
Product and Service, Other
0.3%$411,000
CGCCanopy Growth Corporation
FY 2024
Canadian Cannabis Net Revenue
57.9%$156M
Storz And Bickel
27.3%$73M
International And Other Revenue
14.8%$40M
Other Revenue
0.0%$0
TLRYTilray Brands, Inc.
FY 2025
Cannabis Segment
36.1%$331M
Distribution Revenue
29.6%$271M
Beverage Alcohol Business
27.7%$253M
Wellness Business
6.6%$60M
ACBAurora Cannabis Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

STZConstellation Brands, Inc.
FY 2025
Beer
83.7%$8.5B
ConstellationWinesAndSpirits
16.3%$1.7B

CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSTZLAGGINGACB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

STZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

STZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.4B annually — 48.5x CRON's $193M. STZ is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLRY's -2.5%. On growth, CRON holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRON logoCRONCronos Group Inc.CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…TLRY logoTLRYTilray Brands, In…ACB logoACBAurora Cannabis I…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$193M$294M$1.2B$361M$9.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$810,000-$32M-$3.0B$71M$3.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M-$327M-$2.9B$41M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$163,766-$86M-$94M-$31M$1.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.5%+22.8%+28.0%+62.7%+52.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.5%-24.1%-2.7%+13.3%+34.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.9%-111.0%-2.5%+11.2%+11.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.1%-29.3%-8.1%-8.7%+18.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.0%+20.9%+3.0%+6.8%-9.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+83.8%+70.7%-94.5%-15.0%
STZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TLRY and STZ each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ACB's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STZ's 9.4x.

MetricCRON logoCRONCronos Group Inc.CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…TLRY logoTLRYTilray Brands, In…ACB logoACBAurora Cannabis I…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
Market CapShares × price$981M$122M$660M$195M$26.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$190M$293M$806M$136M$38.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.28x-0.17x164.21x-333.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.34.27x12.70x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.73x9.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.07x0.62x0.59x0.77x2.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.90x0.34x0.25x0.43x3.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.44x
Evenly matched — TLRY and STZ each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CRON and ACB and STZ each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

STZ delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-137 for TLRY. CRON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STZ's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACB scores 7/9 vs TLRY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCRON logoCRONCronos Group Inc.CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…TLRY logoTLRYTilray Brands, In…ACB logoACBAurora Cannabis I…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.9%-43.1%-136.5%+7.2%+13.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.8%-29.5%-100.6%+5.2%+5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.8%-10.2%-66.2%+0.7%+13.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.3%-12.4%-78.1%+0.7%+18.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965475
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.72x0.22x0.17x1.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$790M$235M$147M-$80M$12.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$792M$114M$304M$184M$68M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$348M$451M$104M$12.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-7.79x-89.43x6.27x5.47x
Evenly matched — CRON and ACB and STZ each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TLRY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in STZ five years ago would be worth $6,992 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for CGC. Over the past 12 months, TLRY leads with a +1209.3% total return vs ACB's -25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TLRY at 26.7% vs CGC's -55.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRON logoCRONCronos Group Inc.CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…TLRY logoTLRYTilray Brands, In…ACB logoACBAurora Cannabis I…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.8%-5.0%-41.8%-21.0%+7.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+38.9%-12.4%+1209.3%-25.3%-18.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+29.1%-91.4%+103.6%-47.2%-29.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.6%-99.6%-65.0%-96.1%-30.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1457.6%-94.3%-74.7%-92.0%+12.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.9%-55.9%+26.7%-19.2%-10.8%
TLRY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

STZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

STZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TLRY's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STZ currently trades 76.3% from its 52-week high vs TLRY's 36.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCRON logoCRONCronos Group Inc.CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…TLRY logoTLRYTilray Brands, In…ACB logoACBAurora Cannabis I…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.98x1.90x2.03x1.81x0.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.43$2.38$15.70$6.67$196.91
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.84$0.84$0.35$3.07$126.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+74.9%+47.5%+36.1%+51.4%+76.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.352.937.952.245.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M10.4M4.7M979K1.8M
STZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CRON as "Hold", CGC as "Hold", TLRY as "Hold", ACB as "Hold", STZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1180.5% upside for CGC (target: $14) vs -10.5% for CRON (target: $2). STZ is the only dividend payer here at 2.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCRON logoCRONCronos Group Inc.CGC logoCGCCanopy Growth Cor…TLRY logoTLRYTilray Brands, In…ACB logoACBAurora Cannabis I…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.30$14.47$10.00$5.92$175.70
# AnalystsCovering analysts1526201446
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises4
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

STZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). TLRY leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallConstellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRON vs CGC vs TLRY vs ACB vs STZ: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cronos Group Inc.

(CRON) is the stronger pick with 64. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) offers the better valuation at 164. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?

On forward P/E, Constellation Brands, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?

Over the past 5 years, Constellation Brands, Inc.

(STZ) delivered a total return of -30. 1%, compared to -99. 6% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRON returned +1458% versus CGC's -94. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Constellation Brands, Inc.

(STZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 26β versus Tilray Brands, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning TLRY is approximately 675% more volatile than STZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 170% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cronos Group Inc.

(CRON) is pulling ahead at 64. 4% versus -9. 5% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aurora Cannabis Inc. grew EPS 102. 2% year-over-year, compared to -651. 7% for Tilray Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRON leads at 30. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?

Aurora Cannabis Inc.

(ACB) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 5% net margin versus -266. 3% for Tilray Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus -277. 9% for TLRY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACB leads at 54. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Constellation Brands, Inc.

(STZ) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 34. 3x for Cronos Group Inc. — 21. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGC: 1180. 5% to $14. 47.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ?

In this comparison, STZ (2.

7% yield) pays a dividend. CRON, CGC, TLRY, ACB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CRON or CGC or TLRY or ACB or STZ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Constellation Brands, Inc.

(STZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 26), 2. 7% yield). Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STZ: +12. 6%, TLRY: -74. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CRON and CGC and TLRY and ACB and STZ?

These companies operate in different sectors (CRON (Healthcare) and CGC (Healthcare) and TLRY (Healthcare) and ACB (Healthcare) and STZ (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CRON is a small-cap high-growth stock; CGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TLRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACB is a small-cap high-growth stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. STZ pays a dividend while CRON, CGC, TLRY, ACB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CRON

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 100%
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CGC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TLRY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACB

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CRON and CGC and TLRY and ACB and STZ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CRON: 201.3% · CGC: 20.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.