Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CRSP vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
CRSP vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $5.06B | $1712.35T | $73.68B | $5.90B | $358.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 | $14.92B | $1.56B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-569M | $-168M | $4.42B | $153M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | -41.7% | — | 84.5% | 65.4% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -134.1% | — | 24.3% | 12.3% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.3x | 24.8x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $395M | $22M | $2.71B | $70M | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $355M | $194M | $3.12B | $1.12B | $5.23B |
CRSP vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 115.7 | +15.7% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 216.4 | +116.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 218.7 | +118.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRSP vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRSP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +110.4% vs ABBV's +11.3%
REGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- 29.6% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
- 11.1% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
Among these 5 stocks, ALKS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs CRSP's 272.0%
- Beta 0.34, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.67x
- 8.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs CRSP's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs ABBV's +11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
CRSP vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CRSP vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRSP leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • REGN leads 0 • ALKS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 | $14.9B | $1.6B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$535M | -$112M | $4.2B | $212M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$569M | -$168M | $4.4B | $153M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$401M | -$151M | $4.2B | $392M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -41.7% | — | +84.5% | +65.4% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -134.1% | — | +24.3% | +12.3% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -138.6% | — | +29.6% | +9.8% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -97.8% | — | +27.9% | +25.1% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.6% | — | +19.0% | +28.2% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.0% | +91.5% | -7.2% | -4.1% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALKS and ABBV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 80% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $1712.35T | $73.7B | $5.9B | $358.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $1712.35T | $73.3B | $4.9B | $422.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.10x | -0.76x | 17.09x | 24.76x | 85.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.35x | — | 14.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.70x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.78x | 17.25x | 14.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1440.41x | — | 5.14x | 4.00x | 5.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.45x | 0.66x | 2.46x | 3.28x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.06x | 12.28x | 20.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ALKS and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRSP's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.9% | -130.2% | +14.3% | +8.8% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.5% | -89.0% | +11.1% | +5.4% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.3% | — | +8.9% | +18.9% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.6% | -145.7% | +10.2% | +14.2% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.13x | 0.09x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | -$172M | -$412M | -$1.0B | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $355M | $194M | $3.1B | $1.1B | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $395M | $22M | $2.7B | $70M | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 108.44x | 32.30x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs ABBV's +11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.6% vs CRSP's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.5% | +4.9% | -8.5% | +25.3% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.1% | +110.4% | +27.1% | +16.5% | +11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.3% | +19.7% | -5.1% | +14.5% | +50.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.3% | -69.1% | +43.6% | +60.9% | +101.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +272.0% | -87.0% | +90.0% | -11.0% | +295.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.2% | +6.2% | -1.7% | +4.6% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRSP's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs CRSP's 66.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.93x | 1.26x | 0.81x | 1.06x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.48 | $26.18 | $821.11 | $36.60 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.50 | $7.53 | $476.49 | $25.17 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.8% | +76.3% | +86.4% | +96.7% | +82.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 48.1 | 44.9 | 60.2 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 252K | 631K | 2.3M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRSP as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 20.2% for CRSP (target: $63). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 3.24% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.00 | $46.33 | $865.68 | $44.00 | $256.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 15 | 48 | 28 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
CRSP vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRSP or DBVT or REGN or ALKS or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRSP or DBVT or REGN or ALKS or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRSP or DBVT or REGN or ALKS or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +295. 5% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRSP or DBVT or REGN or ALKS or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus CRISPR Therapeutics AG's 1. 93β — meaning CRSP is approximately 469% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 21% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRSP or DBVT or REGN or ALKS or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 8. 2% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRSP or DBVT or REGN or ALKS or ABBV?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRSP or DBVT or REGN or ALKS or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRSP or DBVT or REGN or ALKS or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CRSP, DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRSP or DBVT or REGN or ALKS or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, CRSP: +272. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRSP and DBVT and REGN and ALKS and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while CRSP, DBVT, REGN, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.